Plebiscites, fiscal policy and the poor: Learning from US experience with direct democracy

Development Policy Review

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 553-566

  Goldsmith, Arthur A ^a,b  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEMOCRACY; FISCAL POLICY; PARTY POLITICS; POVERTY;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 28244467869     PISSN: 09506764     EISSN: 14677679     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7679.2005.00302.x     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Alt, J. E.; Lassen, D. D. and Skilling, D. (2002) 'Fiscal Transparency, Gubernatorial Popularity, and the Scale of Government: Evidence from the States', State Politics and Policy Quarterly 2 (3): 230-50.
2. Baiocchi, G. (2000) 'Participation, Activism, and Politics: The Porto Alegre Experiment and Deliberative Democratic Theory', Politics and Society 29 (1): 43-72.
3. Barczak, M. (2001) 'Representation by Consultation? The Rise of Direct Democracy in Latin America', Latin American Politics and Society 43 (3): 37-59.
4. Bräutigam, D. (2004) 'The People's Budget? Politics, Participation and Pro-poor Policy', Development Policy Review 22 (6): 653-68.
5. Brinkerhoff, D. W. and Goldsmith, A. A. (2003) 'How Citizens Participate in Macroeconomic Policy: International Experience and Implications for Poverty Reduction', World Development 31 (4): 685-701.
6. Broder, D. S. (2000) Democracy Derailed: Initiative Campaigns and the Power of Money. New York: Harcourt.
7. Camobreco, J. F. (1998) 'Preferences, Fiscal Policies, and the Initiative Process', Journal of Politics 60 (3): 819-29.
8. Cronin, T. E. (1989) Direct Democracy: The Politics of Initiative, Referendum, and Recall. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9. Dalton, R. J.; Scarrow, S. and Cain, B. (2004) 'Advanced Democracies and the New Politics', Journal of Democracy 15 (1): 124-38.
10. de Sousa Santos, B. (1998) 'Participatory Budgeting in Pôrto Alegre: Toward a Redistributive Democracy', Politics and Society 26 (4): 461-510.
11. Department for International Development (DFID) (2000) Eliminating World Poverty: Making Globalisation Work for the Poor. Cmd 5006. London: UK Department for International Development.
12. Ellis, R. (2002) Democratic Delusions: The Initiative Process in America. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
13. Engle, M. A. (2000) 'Direct Democracy's Big Price Tag: Stratospheric Spending on State Ballot Measures', Capital Eye 7 (Fall).
14. Farmer, R. (2001) 'Power to the People: The Progressive Movement for the Recall, 1890s-1920', New England Journal of History 57 (2): 59-83.
15. Feld, L. P. and Kirchgässner, G. (2001) 'Does Direct Democracy Reduce Public Debt? Evidence from Swiss Municipalities', Public Choice 109 (3-4): 347-70.
16. Finestone, D. (2002) 'Voters Say Yes to $41 Billion of Bonds', Bond Buyer, 7 November.
17. Frey, B. S. (2003) Direct Democracy for Transition Countries. Working Paper No. 165. Zurich: University of Zurich, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics, July.
18. Gerber, E. R. (1999) The Populist Paradox: Interest Group Influence and the Promise of Direct Legislation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19. Goebel, T. (2002) A Government by the People: Direct Democracy in America, 1890-1940. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
20. Hajnal, Z. L.; Gerber, E. R. and Louch, H. (2002) 'Minorities and Direct Legislation: Evidence from California Ballot Proposition Elections', Journal of Politics 64 (1): 154-77.
21. Hofstadter, R. (1955) The Age of Reform. New York: Knopf.
22. Initiative and Referendum Institute (IRI) (2000) General Election Post Election Report. Washington, DC: IRI and Citizen Lawmaker Press.
23. Kasler, D. (2003) 'Wall Street Slashes State Bond Rating: The Mark Plummets Three Notches, Just Two Away From Junk-Bond Status', Sacramento Bee, 25 July.
24. Kuttner, R. (1980) The Revolt of the Haves: Taxpayer Revolts and the Politics of Austerity. New York: Simon and Schuster.
25. Lascher, E. L. Jr.; Hagen, M. G., and Rochlin, S. A. (1996) 'Gun behind the Door? Ballot Initiatives, State Policies and Public Opinion', Journal of Politics 58 (3): 760-75.
26. LeDuc, L. (2003) The Politics of Direct Democracy: Referendums in Global Perspective. Orchard Park, NY: Broadview Press.
27. Magleby, D. B. (1984) Direct Legislation: Voting on Ballot Propositions in the United States. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
28. Matsusaka, J. G. (1995) 'Fiscal Effects of the Voter Initiative: Evidence from the Last 30 Years', Journal of Political Economy 103 (3): 587-623.
29. Moore, M. and Putzel, J. (1999) Thinking Strategically about Politics and Poverty. Working Paper No. 101. Brighton: Institute of Development Studies at the University of Sussex.
30. New, M. J. (2001) 'Limiting Government through Direct Democracy: The Case of State Tax and Expenditure Limitations', Policy Analysis 420 (13 December): 1-17.
31. Piott, S. L. (2003) Giving Voters a Voice: The Origins of the Initiative and Referendum in America. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Press.
32. Qvortrup, M. (2001) 'Regulation of Direct Democracy outside the USA: Impressions, Tendencies and Patterns from Overseas', in M. D. Waters (ed.), The Battle over Citizen Lawmaking. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
33. Scarrow, S. E. (2001) 'Direct Democracy and Institutional Change: A Comparative Investigation', Comparative Political Studies 34 (6): 651-65.
34. Schrag, P. (1998) Paradise Lost: California's Experience, America's Future. New York: New Press.
35. Smith, D. A. and Lubinski, J. (2002) 'Direct Democracy during the Progressive Era: A Crack in the Populist Veneer?' Journal of Policy History 14 (4): 349-83.
36. Tolbert, C. J. (2001) 'Public Policy and Direct Democracy in the Twentieth Century', in M. D. Waters (ed.), The Battle over Citizen Lawmaking. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
37. Tolbert, C. J.; McNeal, R. S. and Smith, D. A. (2003) 'Enhancing Civic Engagement: The Effect of Direct Democracy on Political Participation and Knowledge', State Politics and Policy Quarterly 3 (1): 23-41.
38. US Census Bureau (2000) Facts for Features: Election Day, 2000: November 7. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau.
39. United Nations (2003) The Role of Public Administration in the Implementation of the United Nations Millennium Declaration. Report of the Secretary-General A/58/152. New York: United Nations, 11 July.
40. Waters, M. D. (2003) 'The Initiative Industry: Its Impact on the Future of the Initiative Process', in J. Gebhardt and H. Oberreuter (eds), Die Zukunft der Direkten Demokratie. Marburg: Philipps University.
41. Zax, J. (1989) 'Initiatives and Government Expenditures', Public Choice 63: 267-77.
42. Zimmerman, J. F. (2001) The Referendum: The People Decide Public Policy. Westport, CT: Praeger.