Aphasia and right hemisphere syndromes in stroke

Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports

Volumn 5, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 458-464

  Jordan, Lori C ^b   Hillis, Argye E ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMPHETAMINE DERIVATIVE; ANTIDEPRESSANT AGENT; BROMOCRIPTINE; CHOLINERGIC RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT; DONEPEZIL; GUANFACINE; MOCLOBEMIDE; PIRACETAM; PLACEBO;

ACUTE DISEASE; APHASIA; BRAIN BLOOD FLOW; BRAIN DISEASE; BRAIN INJURY; CHRONIC DISEASE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CLINICAL TRIAL; COGNITIVE DEFECT; CONVALESCENCE; HUMAN; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; NEGLECT; NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION; PERCEPTION DISORDER; RANDOMIZATION; REHABILITATION MEDICINE; REVIEW; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; SPEECH THERAPY; STROKE; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 28244464826     PISSN: 15284042     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11910-005-0034-z     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. Dobkin BH: Rehabilitation after stroke. N Engl J Med 2005, 352:1677-1684.
2. Pedersen PM, Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, et al.: Aphasia in acute stroke: incidence, determinants, and recovery. Ann Neurol 1995, 38:659-666.
3. American Heart Association: Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics - 2005 Update. http://www.americanheart.org/downloadable/heart/ 1105390918119HDSStats2005Update.pdf. Accessed May 30, 2005.
4. Mohr JP, Lazar RM, Marshall RS, et al.: Middle cerebral artery disease. In Stroke: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and Management, edn 4. Edited by Mohr JP, Choi DW, Grotta JC, Wolf PA. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2004:154-159.
5. Hillis AE, Work M, Breese EL, et al.: Re-examining the brain regions crucial for orchestrating speech articulation. Brain 2004, 127:1479-1487.
6. Hillis AE, Chang S, Breese E: The crucial role of posterior frontal regions in modality specific components of the spelling process. Neurocase 2004, 10:157-187.
7. Hillis AE, Newhart M, Heidler J, Marsh EB, et al.: The neglected role of the right hemisphere in spatial representation of words for reading. Aphasiology 2005, 19:225-238.
8. Hillis AE, Newhart M, Heidler J, et al.: The roles of the "visual word form area" in reading. NeuroImage 2005, 24:548-559.
9. Nadeau S, Crosson B: Subcortical aphasia. Brain Lang 1997, 58:355-402.
10. Hillis AE, Barker PB, Wityk RJ, et al.: Variability in subcortical aphasia is due to variable sites of cortical hypoperfusion. Brain Lang 2004, 89:524-530.
11. Croquelois A, Wintermark M, Reichhart M, et al.: Aphasia in hyperacute stroke: language follows brain penumbra dynamics. Ann Neurol 2003, 54:321-329.
12. Mort DJ, Malhotra P, Mannan SK, et al.: Using SPM normalization for lesion analysis in spatial neglect. Brain 2004, 127:E11.
13. Karnath HO, Berger MF, Zopf R, et al.: Using SPM normalization for lesion analysis in spatial neglect. Brain 2004, 127:E10.
14. Hillis AE, Newhart M, Heidler J, et al.: Anatomy of spatial attention: insights from perfusion imaging and hemispatial neglect in acute stroke. J Neurol Sci 2005, 25:3161-3167.
15. Breese EL, Hillis AE: Auditory comprehension: is multiple choice really good enough? Brain Lang 2004, 89:3-8.
16. Fink JN, Selim MH, Kumar S, et al.: Is the association of national institutes of health stroke scale scores and acute magnetic resonance imaging stroke volume equal for patients with right and left hemisphere stroke? Stroke 2002, 33:954-958.
17. Hillis AE, Wityk RJ, Barker PB, et al.: Change in perfusion in acute nondominant hemisphere stroke may be better estimated by tests of hemispatial neglects than by the national institutes of health stroke scale. Stroke 2003, 34:2392-2398.
18. Reineck LA, Agarwal S, Hillis AE: Diffusion-clinical mismatch is associated with potential for early recovery of aphasia. Neurology 2005, 64:828-833.
19. Cicerone KD, Dahlberg C, Kalmar K, et al.: Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: recommendations for clinical practice. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000, 81:1596-1615.
20. Doesborgh SJ, van de Sandt-Koenderman PJ, Dippel DW, et al.: Effects of semantic treatment on verbal communication and linguistic processing in aphasia after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke 2004, 35:141-146.
21. Bhogal SK, Teasell R, Speechley M: Intensity of aphasia therapy, impact on recovery. Stroke 2003, 34:987-993.
22. Shisler RJ, Baylis GC, Frank EM: Pharmacologic approaches to treatment and prevention of aphasia. Aphasiology 2000, 14:1163-1186.
23. Small SL. A biological model of aphasia rehabilitation:pharmacological perspectives. Aphasiology 2004, 18:473-492.
24. Hillis AE: For a theory of rehabilitation: progress in the decade of the brain. In Effectiveness of Rehabilitation of Cognitive Deficits. Edited by Halligan P, Wade D. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2005.
25. Berthier ML: Poststroke aphasia: epidemiology, pathophysiology and treatment. Drugs Aging 2005, 22:163-182.
26. Bragoni M, Altieri M, Di Piero V: Bromocriptine and speech therapy in non-fluent chronic aphasia after stroke. Neurol Sci 2000, 21:19-22.
27. Walker-Batson D, Curtis S, Natarajan R, et al.: A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the use of amphetamine in the treatment of aphasia. Stroke 2001, 32:2093-2098.
28. Martinsson L, Hardemark HG, Wahlgren NG: Amphetamines for improving stroke recovery: a systematic Cochrane review. Stroke 2003, 34:2766.
29. Laska AC, von Arbin M, Kahan T, et al.: Long-term antidepressant treatment with moclobemide for aphasia in acute stroke patients: a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study. Cerebrovasc Dis 2005, 19:125-132.
30. Berthier ML, Hinojosa J, Martin MC: Open-label study of donepezil in chronic post-stroke aphasia. Neurology 2003, 60:1218-1219.
31. Martin PI, Naeser MA, Theoret H, et al.: Transcranial magnetic stimulation as a complementary treatment for aphasia. Sem Speech Lang 2004, 25:181-191.
32. Mansur CG, Fregni F, Boggio PS, et al.: A sham stimulation-controlled trial of rTMS of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Neurology 2005, 64:1802-1804.
33. Rossetti Y, Rode G, Pisella L, et al.: Prism adaptation to a rightward optical deviation rehabilitates left hemispatial neglect. Nature 1998, 395:166-169.
34. Morris AP, Kritikos A, Berberovic N, et al.: Prism adaptation and spatial attention: a study of visual search innormals and patients with unilateral neglect. Cortex 2004, 40:703-721.
35. Dijkerman HC, Webeling M, ter Wal JM, et al.: A long-lasting improvement of somatosensory function after prism adaptation, a case study. Neuropsychologia 2004, 42:1697-1702.
36. Girardi M, McIntosh RD, Michel C, et al.: Sensorimotor effects on central space representation: prism adaptation influences haptic and visual representations in normal subjects. Neuropsychologia 2004, 42:1477-1487.
37. Angeli V, Benassi MG, Ladavas E: Recovery of oculo-motor bias in neglect patients after prism adaptation. Neuropsychologia 2004, 42:1223-1234.
38. Angeli V, Meneghello F, Mattioli F, et al.: Mechanisms underlying visuo-spatial amelioration of neglect after prism adaptation. Cortex 2004, 40:155-156.
39. Rossetti Y, Jacquin-Courtois S, Rode G, et al.: Does action make the link between number and space representation? Visuomanual adaptation improves number bisection in unilateral neglect. Psychol Sci 2004, 15:426-430.
40. Berberovic N, Pisella L, Morris AP, et al.: Prismatic adaptation reduces biased temporal order judgements in spatial neglect. Neuroreport 2004, 15:1199-1204.
41. Dijkerman HC, McIntosh RD, Milner AD, et al.: Ocular scanning and perceptual size distortion in hemispatial neglect: effects of prism adaptation and sequential stimulus presentation. Exp Brain Res 2003, 153:220-230.
42. Maravita A, McNeil J, Malhotra P, et al.: Prism adaptation can improve contralesional tactile perception in neglect. Neurology 2003, 60:1829-1831.
43. Ferber S, Danckert J, Joanisse M, et al.: Eye movements tell only half the story. Neurology 2003, 60:1826-1829.
44. Beversdorf D, Heilman KM: Prism adaptation treatment of neglect: conflicting results? Neurology 2003, 60:1734-1735.
45. Berberovic N, Mattingley JB: Effects of prismatic adaptation on judgements of spatial extent in peripersonal and extrapersonal space. Neuropsychologia 2003, 41:493-503.
46. Frassinetti F, Angeli V, Meneghello F, et al.: Long-lasting amelioration of visuospatial neglect by prism adaptation. Brain 2002, 125:608-623.
47. Redding GM, Wallace B: Prism adaptation and unilateral neglect: Review and analysis. Neuropsychologia 2005, In press.
48. Castiello U, Lusher D, Burton BA, et al.: Improving left hemispatial neglect using virtual reality. Neurology 2004, 62:1958-1962.
49. Malhotra P, Parton A, Husain M: Noradrenergic modulation of space exploration in visual neglect. Ann Neurol 2005, In press.
50. Pedersen PM, Vinter K, Olsen TS: Aphasia after stroke: type, severity and prognosis. The Copenhagen aphasia study. Cerebrovasc Dis 2004, 17:35-43.
51. Heiss W, Karbe H, Weber-Luxenburger, et al.: Speech induced cerebral metabolic activation reflects recovery from aphasia. J Neurol Sci 1997, 145:213-217.
52. Peck KK, Moore AM, Crosson BA, et al.: Functional magnetic resonance imaging before and after aphasia therapy. Stroke 2004, 35:554-559.
53. Vandenbulke M, Peeters R, Van Hecke P, Vandenberghe R: Anterior temporal laterality in primary progressive aphasia shifts to the right. Ann Neurol 2005, In press.
54. Gillen R, Tennen H, McKee T: Unilateral spatial neglect: relation to rehabilitation outcomes in patients with right hemisphere stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005, 86:763-767.