Non-attenders in an organized cervical screening programme;Karakteristik af «ikkedeltagere» i organiseret screeningsundersøgelse mod livmoderhalskræft

Ugeskrift for Laeger

Volumn 158, Issue 21, 1996, Pages 2987-2991

  Larsen, Lars Peter Skovgaard ^a   Olesen, Frede ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; COHORT ANALYSIS; DENMARK; FEMALE; HUMAN; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT; UTERINE CERVIX TUMOR; VAGINA SMEAR;

ADULT; COHORT STUDIES; DENMARK; FEMALE; HUMANS; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT DROPOUTS; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; VAGINAL SMEARS;

EID: 0030594538     PISSN: 00415782     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Lynge E, Arffmann E, Erbs K, Hansen KC, Henriksen B, Holten IW et al. Status for forebyggende undersøgelser med livmodershalskræft i Danmark 1994. Ugeskr Læger 1994; 156: 471-3.
2. Olesen F. Use of Pap smear in general practice by case finding or screening programme. Scand J Prim Health Care 1986; 4: 59-62.
3. Olesen F. The pattern of attendance at general practice in the years before the diagnosis of cervical cancer. A case control study. Scand J Prim Health Care 1988; 6: 199-203.
4. Chamberlain J. Failures of the cervical cytology screening programme [editorial]. BMJ [Clin Res] 1984; 289: 853-4.
5. Lynge E, Engholm G, Madsen M. Organiseret screenings betydning for udviklingen af livmodershalskræft i Danmark i 1968-1987. Ugeskr Læger 1992; 154: 1330-4.
6. Coleman D, Day N, Douglas G, Farmery E, Lynge E, Philip J et al. European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening. Europe Against Cancer Programme. Eur J Cancer 1993; 29A (suppl 4): 1-38.
7. Sansom CD, Macinerney J, Oliver V, Wakefield J. Differential response to recall in a cervical screening programme. Br J Prev Soc Med 1975; 29: 40-7.
8. Parazzini F, Negri E, La-Vecchia C. Characteristics of women reporting cervical screening. Tumori 1990; 76: 585-9.
9. Lynge E, Madsen M, Engholm G. Effect of organized screening on incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in Denmark, Cancer Res 1989; 49: 2157-60.
10. Majeed FA, Cook DG, Anderson HR, Hilton S, Bunn S, Stones C et al. Using patient and general pratice characteristics to explain variations in cervical smear uptake rates. BMJ 1994; 308: 1272-6.
11. Perucci CA, Rapiti E, Davoli M, Lagorio S, Area M, Miller AB. Rome Women's Screening Study: knowledge, attitudes and practices of women regarding screening for breast and cervical cancer. Tumori 1990; 76: 365-9.
12. Murray M, McMillan C. Social and behavioural predictors of women's cancer screening practices in Nothern Ireland. J Public Health Med 1993; 15: 147-53.
13. Ronco G, Segnan N, Ponti A. who has pap tests? Variables associated with the use of pap tests in absence of screening programmes. Int J Epidemiol 1991; 20: 349-53.
14. Hesselius I, Lisper HO, Nordstrøm A, Anshelm-Olson B, Ydlund B. Comparison between participants and non-participants at a gynaecogical mass screening. Scand J Soc Med 1975; 3: 129-38.
15. Nicoll PM, Narayan KV, Paterson JG. Cervical cancer screening: women's knowledge, attitudes and preferences. Health Bull (Edinb) 1991; 49: 184-90.
16. Sansom CD, Wakefield J, Yule R. Trends in cytological screening in the Manchester area 1965-1971. Community Med 1971; 126: 253-7.
17. Holst E, Scocozza L Lægekontaktfrekvensen i socialmedicinsk belysning. Ugeskr Læger 1972; 134: 1187-95.
18. Lunde IM, Nielsen KB. Screening for livmoderhalskræft - set fra patientperspektiv. Bibl Læger 1993; 185: 48-65.
19. Calnan M. Patterns in preventive behaviour: a study of women in middle age. Soc Sci Med 1985; 20: 263-8.
20. Eardley A, Elkind AK, Spencer B, Hobbs P, Pendleton LL, Haran D. Attendance for cervical screening - whose problem? Soc Sci Med 1985; 20: 955-62.