Contextualizing the vulnerability standard

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 84-86

  Shivas, Tricha ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CLINICAL TRIAL; ETHICS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; METHODOLOGY; NOTE; RESEARCH SUBJECT; VULNERABLE POPULATION;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; CLINICAL TRIALS; HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION; HUMANS; RESEARCH DESIGN; RESEARCH SUBJECTS; VULNERABLE POPULATIONS;

EID: 28244443610     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265160490497137     Document Type: Note

References (8)

1. DeMarco, J. P. 2004. Vulnerability: A needed moral safeguard. The American Journal of Bioethics 4(3): 82-84.
2. Goodin, R. E. 1985. Protecting the vulnerable: A reanalysis of our social responsibilities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3. Jecker, N. 2004. Protecting the vulnerable. The American Journal of Bioethics 4(3): 60-62.
4. Kipnis, K. 2001. Vulnerability in research subjects: A bioethical taxonomy. In Ethical and policy issues in research involving human research participants, G-1-G-13. Bethesda, MD: National Bioethics Advisory Commission.
5. Lederer, S. E. 1995. Subjected to science: Human experimentation in America before the Second World War. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
6. Levine, C., R. Faden, C. Grady, D. Hammerschmidt, L. Eckenwiler, and J. Sugarman. 2004. The limitations of "vulnerability" as a protection for human research participants. The American Journal of Bioethics 4(3): 44-49.
7. Silvers, A. 2004. Historical vulnerability and special scrutiny: Precautions against discrimination in medical research. The American Journal of Bioethics 4(3): 56-57.
8. Young, I. M. 1990. Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.