Historical vulnerability and special scrutiny: Precautions against discrimination in medical research

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 56-57

  Silvers, Anita ^a  

^a SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AFRICAN AMERICAN; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; ETHICS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MENTAL CAPACITY; MENTAL DEFICIENCY; NOTE; PATIENT SELECTION; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; RESEARCH ETHICS; RESEARCH SUBJECT; SOCIOECONOMICS; UNITED STATES; VULNERABLE POPULATION;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

AFRICAN AMERICANS; ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; ETHICS, RESEARCH; HUMANS; MENTAL COMPETENCY; MENTAL RETARDATION; NONTHERAPEUTIC HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION; PATIENT SELECTION; RESEARCH SUBJECTS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; UNITED STATES; VULNERABLE POPULATIONS;

EID: 28244462803     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265160490497353     Document Type: Note

References (6)

1. Kipnis, K. 2001. Vulnerability in research subjects: A bioethical taxonomy. In Ethical and policy issues in research involving human participants. Bethesda, MD: National Bioethics Advisory Commission.
2. Kottow, M. H. 2003. The vulnerable and the susceptible. Bioethics 17(5-6): 460-471.
3. Levine, C., R. Faden, C. Grady, D. Hammerschmidt, L. Eckenwiler, and J. Jugarman, 2004. The limitations of "vulnerability" as a protection for human research participants. The American Journal of Bioethics 4(3): 44-49.
4. Silvers, A., and M. A. Stein. 2001. Disability, equal protection, and the Supreme Court: Standing at the crossroads of progressive and retrogressive logic in constitutional classification. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform 35(1&2): 81-136.
5. Silvers, A., and M. A. Stein. 2003. From Plessy (1896) and Goesart (1948) to Cleburne (1986) and Garrett (2001): A chill wind from the past blows equal protection away. In Backlash against the ADA: Reinterpreting disability rights, ed. L. Krieger. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
6. U.S. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. 1979. The Belmont Report: Ethical guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.