Laparoscopic colectomy

Current Gastroenterology Reports

Volumn 7, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 396-403

  Chang, George J ^b   Nelson, Heidi ^a  

^a Mayo Clinic College of Medicine   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER SURGERY; COLON CANCER; COLON DISEASE; COLON RESECTION; CONVALESCENCE; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; COST OF ILLNESS; CROHN DISEASE; DIVERTICULOSIS; ESTHETICS; EXPERIENCE; HUMAN; ILEUS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; REVIEW; SKILL; SURGEON; SURGICAL TRAINING; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ULCERATIVE COLITIS;

EID: 28244440953     PISSN: 15228037     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11894-005-0010-4     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 2004, 350:2050-2059.
2. Chang YJ, Marcello PW, Rusin LC, et al.: Hand-assisted laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: helping hand or hindrance? Surg Endosc 2005, 19:656-661.
3. Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al.: Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial [see comment]. Lancet 2002, 359:2224-2229.
4. Leung KA, Kwok SP, Lam SCW, et al.: Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial. Lancet 2004, 363:1187-1192.
5. Milsom JW, Bohm B, Hammerhofer KA, et al.: A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report. J Am Coll Surg 1998, 187:46-54, discussion 54-55.
6. Stage JG, Schulze S, Moller P, et al.: Prospective randomized study of laparoscopic versus open colonic resection for adenocarcinoma [see comment]. Br J Surg 1997, 84:391-396.
7. Braga M, Vignali A, Gianotti L, et al.: Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: a randomized trial on short-term outcome. Ann Surg 2002, 236:759-766, discussion 767.
8. Hasegawa H, Kabeshima Y, Watanabe M, et al.: Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open colectomy for advanced colorectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2003, 17:636-640.
9. Marusch F, Gastinger I, Schneider C, et al.: Importance of conversion for results obtained with laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2001, 44:207-214, discussion 214-216.
10. Scheidbach H, Schneider C, Rose J, et al.: Laparoscopic approach to treatment of sigmoid diverticulitis: changes in the spectrum of indications and results of a prospective, multicenter study on 1,545 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 2004, 47:1883-1888.
11. Tekkis PP, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP: Conversion rates in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a predictive model with 1253 patients. Surg Endosc 2005, 19:47-54.
12. Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, Brady KM, Fazio VW: Standardized approach to laparoscopic right colectomy: outcomes in 70 consecutive cases. J Am Coll Surg 2004, 199:675-679.
13. Zhou ZG, Hu M, Li Y, et al.: Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 2004, 18:1211-1215.
14. Hewitt PM, Ip SM, Kwok SP, et al.: Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open surgery for colorectal cancer: comparative study of immune effects. Dis Colon Rectum 1998, 41:901-909.
15. Schwenk W, Bohm B, Muller JM: Postoperative pain and fatigue after laparoscopic or conventional colorectal resections: a prospective randomized trial. Surg Endosc 1998, 12:1131-1136.
16. Schwenk W, Bohm B, Haase O, et al.: Laparoscopic versus conventional colorectal resection: a prospective randomised study of postoperative ileus and early postoperative feeding. Langenbecks Arch Surg 1998, 383:49-55.
17. Milsom JW, Hammerhofer KA, Bohm B, et al.: Prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic vs. conventional surgery for refractory ileocolic Crohn's disease. Dis Colon Rectum 2001, 44:1-8, discussion 8-9.
18. Lezoche E, Feliciotti F, Guerrieri M, et al.: Laparoscopic versus open hemicolectomy. Minerva Chir 2003, 58:491-507.
19. Basse L, Jakobsen DH, Bardram L, et al.: Functional recovery after open versus laparoscopic colonic resection: a randomized, blinded study. Ann Surg 2005, 241:416-423.
20. Zutshi M, Delaney CP, Senagore AJ, Fazio VW: Shorter hospital stay associated with fastrack postoperative care pathways and laparoscopic intestinal resection are not associated with increased physical activity. Colorectal Dis 2004, 6:477-480.
21. Hildebrandt U, Kessler K, Plusczyk T, et al.: Comparison of surgical stress between laparoscopic and open colonic resections. Surg Endosc 2003, 17:242-246.
22. Whelan RL, Franklin M, Holubar SD, et al.: Postoperative cell mediated immune response is better preserved after laparoscopic vs open colorectal resection in humans. Surg Endosc 2003, 17:972-978.
23. Rose J, Schneider C, Yildirim C, et al.: Complications in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: results of a multicentre trial. Tech Coloproctol 2004, 8(Suppl 1):s25-s28.
24. Delgado S, Lacy AM, Garcia Valdecasas JC, et al.: Could age be an indication for laparoscopic colectomy in colorectal cancer? Surg Endosc 2000, 14:22-26.
25. Senagore AJ, Madbouly KM, Fazio VW, et al.: Advantages of laparoscopic colectomy in older patients. Arch Surg 2003, 138:252-256.
26. Bergamaschi R, Pessaux P, Arnaud JP: Comparison of conventional and laparoscopic ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease. Dis Colon Rectum 2003, 46:1129-33.
27. Weeks JC, Nelson H, Gelber S, et al.: Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA 2002, 287:321-328.
28. Thaler K, Dinnewitzer A, Mascha E, et al.: Long-term outcome and health-related quality of life after laparoscopic and open colectomy for benign disease. Surg Endosc 2003, 17:1404-1408.
29. Maartense S, Dunker MS, Slors JF, et al.: Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 2004, 240(6):984-991, discussion 991-992.
30. Stead ML, Brown JM, Bosanquet N, et al.: Assessing the relative costs of standard open surgery and laparoscopic surgery in colorectal cancer in a randomised controlled trial in the United Kingdom. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2000, 33:99-103.
31. Group CS: COLOR: a randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open resection for colon cancer. Digest Surg 2000, 17:617-622.
32. Scheidbach H, Rose J, Huegel O, et al.: Results of laparoscopic treatment of rectal cancer: analysis of 520 patients. Tech Coloproctol 2004, 8(Suppl 1):s22-s24.
33. Morino M, Parini U, Giraudo G, et al.: Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a consecutive series of 100 patients. Ann Surg 2003, 237:335-342.
34. Delgado S, Momblan D, Salvador L, et al.: Laparoscopic-assisted approach in rectal cancer patients: lessons learned from >200 patients. Surg Endosc 2004, 18:1457-1462.
35. Leroy J, Jamali F, Forbes L, et al.: Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer surgery: long-term outcomes. Surg Endosc 2004, 18:281-289.
36. Benn PL, Wolff BG, Ilstrup DM: Level of anastomosis and recurrent colonic diverticulitis. Am J Surg 1986, 151(2):269-71.
37. Senagore AJ, Duepree HJ, Delaney CP, et al.: Cost structure of laparoscopic and open sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease: similarities and differences. Dis Colon Rectum 2002, 45:485-490.
38. Thaler K, Baig MK, Berho M, et al.: Determinants of recurrence after sigmoid resection for uncomplicated diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum 2003, 46:385-388.
39. Lawrence DM, Pasquale MD, Wasser TE: Laparoscopic versus open sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis. Am Surg 2003, 69:499-503, discussion 503-504.
40. Dwivedi A, Chahin F, Agrawal S, et al.: Laparoscopic colectomy vs. open colectomy for sigmoid diverticular disease. Dis Colon Rectum 2002, 45:1309-1314, discussion 1314-1315.
41. Schmitt SL, Cohen SM, Wexner SD, et al.: Does laparoscopic-assisted ileal pouch anal anastomosis reduce the length of hospitalization? Int J Colorectal Dis 1994, 9:134-137.
42. Duepree HJ, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP, et al.: Advantages of laparoscopic resection for ileocecal Crohn's disease. Dis Colon Rectum 2002, 45:605-610.
43. Young-Fadok TM, HallLong K, McConnell EJ, et al.: Advantages of laparoscopic resection for ileocolic Crohn's disease. Improved outcomes and reduced costs. Surg Endosc 2001, 15:450-454.
44. Liberman MA, Phillips EH, Carroll BJ, et al.: Laparoscopic colectomy vs traditional colectomy for diverticulitis: outcome and costs. Surg Endosc 1996, 10:15-18.
45. Marcello PW, Milsom JW, Wong SK, et al.: Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: case-matched comparative study with open restorative proctocolectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2000, 43:604-608.
46. Young-Fadok TM, Dozois E, Sandborn WJ, Tremaine WJ: A case matched study of laparoscopic proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (PC-IPAA) versus open PC-IPAA for ulcerative colitis. Gastroenterology 2001, 2303:A-452.
47. Dunker MS, Bemelman WA, Slors JF, et al.: Functional outcome, quality of life, body image, and cosmesis in patients after laparoscopic-assisted and conventional restorative proctocolectomy: a comparative study. Dis Colon Rectum 2001, 44:1800-1807.
48. Brown SR, Eu KW, Seow-Choen F: Consecutive series of laparoscopic-assisted vs. minilaparotomy restorative proctocolectomies. Dis Colon Rectum 2001, 44:397-400.
49. Alabaz O, Iroatulam AJ, Nessim A, et al.: Comparison of laparoscopically assisted and conventional ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease. Eur J Surg 2000, 166:213-217.