Memory in self-organized criticality

Europhysics Letters

Volumn 72, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 678-684

  Lippiello, E ^a   De Arcangelis, L ^b   Godano, C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

^b SECOND UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 28244434045     PISSN: 02955075     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1209/epl/i2005-10292-x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. BAK P., TANG C. and WIESENFELD K., Phys. Rev. Lett., 59 (1987) 381.
2. BAK P. and TANG C., J. Geophys. Res., 94 (1989) 15635.
3. SORNETTE A. and SORNETTE D., Europhys. Lett., 9 (1989) 197.
4. LISE S. and PACZUSKI M., Phys. Rev. E, 64 (2001) 046111.
5. LISE S. and PACZUSKI M., Phys. Rev. Lett., 88 (2002) 228301.
6. BAK P. and SNEPPEN K., Phys. Rev. Lett., 71 (1993) 4083.
7. LU E. T. and HAMILTON R. J., Astrophys. J., 380 (1991) L89;
8. HAMON D., NICODEMI M. and JENSEN H. J., Astron. Astrophys., 387 (2002) 326;
9. HUGHES D. et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 90 (2003) 131101.
10. POLITZER P. A., Phys. Rev. Lett., 84 (2000) 1192.
11. FAILLETTAZ J., LOUCHET F. and GRASSO J. R., Phys. Rev. Lett., 93 (2004) 208001.
12. PETERS O., HERTLEIN C. and CHRISTENSEN K., Phys. Rev. Lett., 88 (2002) 018701.
13. BOFFETTA G., CARBONE V., GIULIANI P., VELTRI P. and VULPIANI A., Phys. Rev. Lett., 83 (1999) 4662.
14. CORRAL A., Phys. Rev. Lett., 92 (2004) 108501.
15. ANTONI V. et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 87 (2001) 045001;
16. SPADA E. et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 86 (2001) 3032.
17. ITO K. and MATSUZAKI M., J. Geophys. Res., 95 (1990) 6853.
18. BROWN S. R., SHOLTZ C. H. and RUNDLE J. B., Geophys. Res. Lett., 18 (1991) 215;
19. NAKANISHI H., Phys. Rev. A, 43 (1991) 6613.
20. OLAMI Z., FEDER H. J. S. and CHRISTENSEN K., Phys. Rev. Lett., 68 (1992) 1244.
21. OMORI F., J. Coll Sci. Imp. Univ. Tokio, 7 (1894) 111;
22. UTSU T., Geophys. Mag., 30 (1961) 521.
23. HILL D. P. et al., Science, 260 (1993) 1617.
24. STEIN R. S., Nature, 402 (1999) 605;
25. PARSON T. et al., Science, 288 (2000) 661.
26. -2 bar.
27. DIETERICH J., J. Geophys. Res., 99 (1994) 2601.
28. RUINA A., J. Geophys. Res., 88 (1983) 10359.
29. MEGA M. S. et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 90 (2003) 188501;
30. SCAFETTA N. and WEST B. J., Phys. Rev. Lett., 92 (2004) 138501.
31. c, the event always nucleates from the epicenter. These sites can either be involved in the event propagation or become epicenters for successive events. This choice is expression of fracture being a phenomenon controlled by the extreme value statistics.
32. Typical duration of fracture propagation for magnitude 4 earthquakes is of the order of 0.1s whereas typical delay between two successive events is of the order of minutes.
33. LIPPIELLO E., DE ARCANGELIS L. and GODANO C., in preparation.
34. Southern California Seismographic Network, http://www.scecdc.scec.org/ ftp/catalogs/SCSN/, including 366000 events with magnitude M ≥ 1 from 1975 to 2004.
35. GUTENBERG B. and RICHTER C. F., Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 34 (1944) 185.