Learning theories: Applications for instruction in constraint-based solid modeling and other engineering graphics topics

Engineering Design Graphics Journal

Volumn 69, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 6-15

  Hartman, Nathan W ^a   Branoff, Theodore J ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER GRAPHICS; EDUCATION; LEARNING SYSTEMS; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; STUDENTS;

ENGINEERING GRAPHICS; LEARNING ENVIRONMENT; LEARNING THEORIES;

CONSTRAINT THEORY;

EID: 28144454755     PISSN: 00462012     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. rd ed.) New York, NY: Freeman.
2. th ed.). New York: Longman.
3. Baxter, D. H. (2002). Evaluating student performance in a freshman graphics course to provide early intervention for students with visualization and/or design intent difficulties. Paper presented at the 2002 Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, June 16-19, 2002.
4. rd Edition. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
5. Branoff, T. J., Hartman, N. W. & Wiebe, E. N. (2002). Three-dimensional solid modeling in an introductory engineering graphics course: Re-examining the curriculum. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 66 (1), 5-10.
6. Branoff, T. J., Wiebe, E. N., & Hartman, N. W. (2003). Integrating Constraint-Based CAD into an Introductory Engineering Graphics Course: Activities and Grading Strategies. Paper presented at the 2003 Annual Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education, Nashville, Tennessee, June 20-23, 2003.
7. Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. London: Pergammon.
8. Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R. & Farr, M. J. (1988). The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9. Craik, F. I. M. & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 671-684.
10. Driscoll, M. (2000). Psychology of learning for instruction (2 ed.). New York: Allyn & Bacon.
11. th Midyear Conference of the Engineering Design Graphics Division of the American Society for Engineering Education, Tempe, Arizona, 1990.
12. th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice-Hall.
13. Hartman, N. W. (2003). Towards the development and definition of expertiseint he use of constraint-based CAD tools: Examining practicing professionals. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. North Carolina State University: Raleigh, NC.
14. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference and consciousness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15. Miller, C. L., & Bertoline, G. R. (1991). Spatial visualization research and theories. The Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 55 (3), 5-14.
16. Neath, I. (1998). Human memory. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks-Cole.
17. Newel, A. & Simon, H.A. (1972). Human problem solving. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
18. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual code approach. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
19. Theory Into Practice. URL: http.//tip.psychology.org/bandura.html. Retrieved January 2, 2004.
20. Wickens, C. D. & Hollands, J. G. (2000). Engineering psychology and human performance. (3 ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
21. th Midyear Conference of the Engineering Design Graphics Division of the American Society for Engineering Education, Indianapolis, Indiana, October 27-30, 2002.
22. Wiebe, E. N. (1999). 3-D constraint-based modeling: Finding common themes. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 63(3), 15-31.