Prediction of lung adenocarcinoma without vessel invasion: A CT scan volumetric analysis

Chest

Volumn 128, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 3276-3283

  Tateishi, Ukihide ^a   Uno, Hajime ^b   Yonemori, Kan ^a   Satake, Mistuo ^a   Takeuchi, Masahiro ^c   Arai, Yasuaki ^a  

^a NATIONAL CANCER CENTER HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^b HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^c KITASATO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

CT scan; Lung; Lung cancer

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER INVASION; CANCER PATIENT; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; GENDER; HUMAN; LUNG ADENOCARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; RELIABILITY; TUMOR VOLUME; VALIDATION PROCESS; VOLUMETRY;

EID: 28144445195     PISSN: 00123692     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1378/chest.128.5.3276     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Travis WD, Colby TV, Corrin B, et al. Histological typing of lung and pleural tumors. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 1999
2. Noguchi M, Morikawa A, Kawasaki M, et al. Small adenocarcinoma of the lung: histologic characteristics and prognosis. Cancer 1995; 75:2844-2852
3. Jang HJ, Lee KS, Kwon OJ, et al. Bronchioloalveolar carcinoma: focal area of ground-glass attenuation at thin-section CT as an early sign. Radiology 1996; 199:485-488
4. Kuriyama K, Seto M, Kasugai T, et al. Ground-glass opacity on thin-section CT: value in differentiating subtypes of adenocarcinoma of the lung. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 173:465-469
5. Ohde Y, Nagai K, Yoshida J, et al. The proportion of consolidation to ground-glass opacity on high resolution CT is a good predictor for distinguishing the population of non-invasive peripheral adenocarcinoma. Lung Cancer 2003; 42:303-310
6. Aoki T, Tomoda Y, Watanabe H, et al. Peripheral lung adenocarcinoma: correlation of thin-section CT findings with histologic prognostic factors and survival. Radiology 2001; 220:803-809
7. Suzuki K, Yokose T, Yoshida J, et al. Prognostic significance of the size of central fibrosis in peripheral adenocarcinoma of the lung. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 69:893-897
8. Kodama K, Higashiyama M, Yokouchi H, et al. Prognostic value of ground-glass opacity found in small lung adenocarcinoma on high-resolution CT scanning. Lung Cancer 2002; 33:17-25
9. Matsunaga H, Yokoi K, Anraku M, et al. Proportion of ground-glass opacity on high-resolution computed tomography in clinical T1N0M0 adenocarcinoma of the lung: a predictor of lymph node metastasis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 124:278-284
10. Kim EA, Johkoh T, Lee KS, et al. Quantification of ground-glass opacity on high-resolution CT of small peripheral adenocarcinoma of the lung: pathologic and prognostic implications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177:1417-1422
11. Takashima S, Maruyama Y, Hasegawa M, et al. Prognostic significance of high-resolution CT findings in small peripheral adenocarcinoma of the lung: a retrospective study on 64 patients. Lung Cancer 2002; 36:289-295
12. Lababede O, Meziane MA, Rice TW. TNM staging of lung cancer: a quick reference chart. Chest 1999; 115:233-235
13. Adler B, Padley S, Miller RR, et al. High-resolution CT of bronchioloalveolar carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992; 159:275-277
14. Winter-Muram HT, Jennings SG, Tarver RD, et al. Volumetric growth rate of stage I lung cancer prior to treatment: serial CT scanning. Radiology 2002; 223:798-805
15. Winter-Muram HT, Jennings SG, Meyer CA, et al. Effect of varying CT section width on volumetric measurement of lung tumors and application of compensatory equations. Radiology 2003; 229:184-194
16. Jennings SG, Winter-Muram HT, Tarver RD, et al. Lung tumor growth: assessment with CT-comparison of diameter and cross-sectional area with volume measurements. Radiology 2004; 231:866-871
17. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982; 143:29-36
18. Swensen SJ, Silverstein MD, Ilstrup DM, et al. The probability of malignancy in solitary pulmonary nodules: application to small radiologically intermediate nodules. Arch Intern Med 1997; 157:849-855
19. Lemeshow S, Hosmer DW. A review of goodness-of-fit statistics for use in the development of logistic regression models. Am J Epidemiol 1982; 115:92-106
20. Wasson JH, Sox HC, Neff RK, et al. Clinical prediction rules: applications and methodological standards. N Engl J Med 1985; 313:793-799
21. Scott JA. Pulmonary perfusion patterns and pulmonary arterial pressure. Radiology 2002; 224:513-518
22. Arana E, Delicado P, Marti-Bormati L. Validation procedures in radiologic diagnostic models: neural network and logistic regression. Invest Radiol 1999; 34:636-642
23. Stone M. Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions, J R Stat Soc B 1974; 36:111-147
24. Henschke CI, McCauley DI, Yankelevitz DF, et al. Early lung cancer action project: overall design and findings from baseline screening. Lancet 1999; 354:99-105
25. Henschke CI, Yankelevitz DF, Mircheva R, et al. CT screening for lung cancer: frequency and significance of part-solid and nonsolid nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 1178:1053-1057
26. Yankelevitz DF, Reeves AP, Kostis WJ, et al. Small pulmonary nodules: volmnetrically determined growth rates based on CT evaluation. Radiology 2000; 217:251-256
27. Revel MP, Lefort C, Bissery A, et al. Pulmonary nodules: preliminary experience with three-dimensional evaluation. Radiology 2004; 231:459-466
28. Revel MP, Bissery A, Bienvenu M, et al. Are two-dimensional CT measurements of small noncalcified pulmonary nodules reliable? Radiology 2004; 231:453-458
29. Staron RB, Ford E. Computed tomographic volumetric calcification reproducibility. Invest Radiol 1986; 21:272-274