Nanolocalized nonlinear electron photoemission under coherent control

Nano Letters

Volumn 5, Issue 11, 2005, Pages 2325-2329

  Stockman, Mark I ^a   Hewageegana, Prabath ^a  

^a GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COHERENT CONTROL; HOT SPOTS; NANOMETER SCALE; PHOTOELECTRON EMISSION;

ANTENNAS; NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS; PHOTOEMISSION; PHOTONS; SILVER;

ELECTRONS;

EID: 28144433994     PISSN: 15306984     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/nl051895m     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Stockman, M. I. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 93, 137404-1-4.
2. Ogawa, S.; Nagano, H.; Petek, H.; Heberle, A. P. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1997, 78, 1339-1342.
3. Stockman, M. I.; Faleev, S. V.; Bergman, D. J. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, 88, 067402-1-4.
4. Stockman, M. I.; Bergman, D. J.; Kobayashi, T. Phys. Rev. B 2004, 69, 054202-10.
5. Kubo, A.; Onda, K.; Petek, H.; Sun, Z.; Jung, Y. S.; Kim, H. K. Nano Lett. 2005, 5, 1123-1127.
6. Stockman, M. I.; Faleev, S. V.; Bergman, D. J. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 87, 167401-1-4.
7. Stietz, F.; Bosbach, J.; Wenzel, T.; Vartanyan, T.; Goldmann, A.; Trägger, F. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000, 84, 5644-5677.
8. Bosbach, J.; Hendrich, C.; Stietz, F.; Vartanyan, T.; Trager, F. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2002, 89, 257404-1-4.
9. Zentgraf, T.; Christ, A.; Kuhl, J.; Giessen, H. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 93, 243901-1-4.
10. Johnson, P. B.; Christy, R. W. Phys. Rev. B 1972, 6, 4370-4379.
11. Keldysh, L. V. J. Exptl. Theor. Phys. (USSR) 1965, 20, 1307-1314.
12. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 1964, 47, 1945-1957.
13. Apolonski, A.; Dombi, P.; Paulus, G. G.; Kakehata, M.; Holzwarth, R.; Udem, T.; Lemell, C.; Torizuka, K.; Burgdoerfer, J.; Mansch, T. W.; Krausz, F. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 92, 073902-1-4.
14. Corkum, P. B.; Burnett, N. H.; Brunel, F. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1989, 62, 1259-1262.
15. Landau, L. D.; Lifshitz, E. M. Quantum Mechanics: Non-Relativistic Theory; Pergamon Press: Oxford and New York, 1965.
16. The relatively smaller value of current for τ ≳ 30 fs is not of principal importance since it can always be compensated by a moderate (not more than by a factor of √2) increase of the excitation intensity