The semantic and syntactic decomposition of get: An interaction between verb meaning and particle placement

Journal of Semantics

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 401-438

  McIntyre, Andrew ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 28044473374     PISSN: 01675133     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jos/ffh019     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Baker, M. (1988) Incorporation. University Press. Chicago.
2. Baker, M. (1997) 'Thematic roles and syntactic structure'. In L. Haegeman (ed.), Elements of Grammar. Kluwer. Dordrecht.
3. Belvin, R. (1993) 'The two causative haves are the two possessive haves'. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 20:19-34.
4. Belvin, R. (1996), Inside Events. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Southern California.
5. Belvin, R. & den Dikken, M. (1997) 'There, happens, to, be, have'. Lingua 101:151-183.
6. Benveniste, E. (1966) Problèmes dc Linguistique Générale. Gallimard. Paris.
7. Bierwisch, M. (2004) BECOME and its Presuppositions. Ms. Humboldt-Universität. Berlin.
8. Cruse, D. A. (1973) 'Some thoughts on agentivity'. Journal of Linguistics 9:11-23.
9. Déchaine, R.-M., Hoekstra, T., & Rooryck, J. (1994) 'Augmented and non-augmented have'. In L. Nash and G. Tsoulas (eds.) Proceedings of Langues et Grammaire 1:85-101.
10. Dehé, N. (2002), Particle Verbs in English. Benjamins. Amsterdam.
11. Dehé, N., Jackendoff, R. McIntyre, A., & Urban, S. (eds.), (2002) Verb particle explorations. Mouton de Gruyter. Berlin.
12. den Dikken, M., (1995), Particles. Oxford University Press. Oxford.
13. den Dikken, M. (1997) 'The syntax of possession and the verb "have"'. Lingua 101:129-150.
14. Di Meola, C. (1994) Kommen und Gehen. Niemeyer. Tübingen.
15. Dowty, D. (1979) Word meaning and Montague Grammar. Reidel. Dordrecht.
16. Fodor, J. A. & Lepore, E. (1998) 'The emptiness of the lexicon'. Linguistic Inquiry 29:269-288.
17. Freeze, R. (1992) 'Existentials and other locatives'. Language 68:553-596
18. Givon, T. & Yang, L. (1994), 'The rise of the English get-passive'. In B. Fox and P. J. Hopper, Voice. Benjamins. Amsterdam. 119-149.
19. Goldberg, A. (1995) Constructions. University of Chicago Press. Chicago.
20. Haegeman, L. (1985) 'The get-passive and Burzio's generalisation'. Lingua 66:53-77.
21. Haegeman, L. & Guéron, J. (1999) English Grammar. Blackwell. Oxford
22. Haider, H. (1997) 'Precedence among predicates'. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 1:3-41.
23. Hale, K. & Keyser, S. (1993) 'On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations'. In K. Hale & S. Keyser (eds), The View from Building 20. MIT Press. Cambridge, MA. 53-110.
24. Harley, H. (1995) Subjects, events and licensing. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. MIT.
25. Harley, H. (1998) 'You're having me on! Aspects of have'. In J. Guéron & A. Zribi-Hertz (eds), La Grammaire de la Possession. Publedix. Nanetter. 195-226.
26. Harley, H. (2004) 'Wanting, having and getting'. Linguistic Inquiry 35:255-267.
27. Harley, H. & Noyer, R. (1998) 'Mixed nominalisations, short verb movement and object shift in English'. NELS 28:143-157.
28. Jackendoff, R. (1990) Semantic Structures. MIT Press. Cambridge, MA.
29. Johnson, K. (1991) 'Object Positions'. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9:577-636.
30. Kayne, R. (1993) 'Toward a modular theory of auxiliary selection'. Studia Linguistica 47:3-31.
31. Kimball, J. (1973) 'Get'. In J. Kimball (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 2. Academic Press. New York. 205-15.
32. Koizumi, M. (1993) 'Object agreement phrases and the split VP hypothesis'. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 18:99-148.
33. Koopman, H. (1995) 'On verbs that fail to undergo V-second'. Linguistic Inquiry 26:139-163.
34. Kratzer, A. (1996) 'Severing the external argument from the verb'. In J. Rooryck & L. Zaring (eds), Phrase Structure and the Lexicon. Kluwer. Dordrecht. 109-137.
35. Larson, R., den Dikken, M., & Ludlow, P. (1997) 'Intensional transitive verbs and abstract clausal complementation'. http://semlab2.sbs.sunysb.edu/Users/rlarson/larson-papers.html
36. Marantz, A. (1997) 'No escape from syntax'. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4:201-225.
37. McIntyre, A. (2004) 'Event paths, conflation, argument structure and VP shells'. Linguistics 42:523-571.
38. Olsen, S. (2000) 'Against Incorporation'. Linguistische Arbeitsberichte 74:149-172.
39. Pesetsky, D. (1992) Zero Syntax. (Version 2.0) Ms. MIT.
40. Pesetsky, D. (1995) Zero Syntax. MIT Press. Cambridge, MA.
41. Piñón, C. (1997) 'Achievements in an event semantics'. A. Lawson and E. Cho (eds), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 7. CLC Publications, Cornell University. Ithaca, NY.
42. Pylkkänen, L. (2002) Introducing Arguments. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. MIT.
43. Radford, A. (1997) Syntactic Theory and the Structure of English. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
44. Richards, N. (2001) 'An idiomatic argument for lexical decomposition'. Linguistic Inquiry 32:183-192.
45. Ritter, E. & Rosen, S. T. (1997) 'The function of have'. Lingua 101:295-321.
46. Stechow, A. von (1996) 'The different readings of wieder "again"'. Journal of Semantics 13:87-138.
47. Svenonius, P. (1996) 'The verb-particle alternation in the Scandinavian languages'. Ms. Tromsø. www.hum.uit.no/a/svenonius
48. Tobin, Y. (1994) Aspect in the English verb. Longman. London.
49. Williams, E. (1981) 'On the notions "Lexically Related" and "Head of a Word"'. Linguistic Inquiry 12:245-74.
50. Wunderlich, D. (1997) 'CAUSE and the structure of verbs'. Linguistic Inquiry 28:27-68.
51. Zeller, J. (2001) Particle Verbs and Local Domains. John Benjamins. Amsterdam.