The function of have

Lingua

Volumn 101, Issue 3-4, 1997, Pages 295-321

  Ritter, Elizabeth ^a   Rosen, Sara Thomas ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038913785     PISSN: 00243841     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0024-3841(96)00024-1     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Baker, M.C., 1988. Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
2. Belvin, R., 1993. The two causative haves are the two possessive haves. CLS 29.
3. Belvin, R. and M. den Dikken, 1995. There 'happens to' be have. SLE workshop on the syntax of possession and the verb have, Leiden.
4. Benveniste, E., 1966. Problèmes de linguistique générale. Paris: Gallimard.
5. Borer, H., 1994. The projection of arguments. In: E. Benedicto and J. Runner (eds.), Functional projections: University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 17, 19-47. Amherst, MA GLSA, University of Massachusetts.
6. Brunson, B., 1992. Thematic discontinuity. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Toronto.
7. Brunson, B. and E. Cowper, 1992. On the topic of have. Proceedings of CLA Annual Conference, Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics, University of Toronto, 43-52.
8. Burzio, L., 1986. Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
9. Cowper, E., 1989. Thematic underspecification: The case of have. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 10, University of Toronto, 85-94.
10. Cowper, E., 1991. Thematic underspecification and manner-of-motion verbs. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics 11.2, University of Toronto, 1-8.
11. Déchaine, R., T. Hoekstra and J. Rooryck, 1994. Augmented and non-augmented HAVE. To appear in L. Nash and G. Tsoulas (eds.), Proceedings of Langues et Grammaire 1.
12. Den Dikken, M., 1995. Copulas. Unpublished ms., Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam and HIL.
13. Doron, E., 1983. Verbless predicates in Hebrew. Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin.
14. Dowty, D., 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67, 510-546.
15. Erteschik-Shir, N., 1995. The dynamics of focus structure. Ms., Ben-Gurion University of the Negev.
16. Foley, W.A. and R.D. Van Valin, Jr., 1984. Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Freeze, R., 1992. Existentials and other locatives. Language 68, 553-596.
18. Guéron, J., 1985. Inalienable possession, PRO-inclusion and lexical chains. In: L. Guéron, H-G. Obenauer, J.-Y. Pollock (eds.), Grammatical representation, 43-86. Dordrecht: Foris.
19. Guéron, J., 1995. On have and be. To appear in Proceedings of NELS 25. Amherst: GLSA.
20. Harley, H., 1995. You're having me on! Aspects of have. Ms., Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
21. Hoekstra, T., 1992. Have as be plus or minus. In: G. Cinque, J. Koster, J.-Y. Pollock, L. Rizzi and R. Zanuttini (eds.), Paths towards universal grammar: Studies in honor of Richard S. Kayne, 199-215. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
22. Hornstein, N., S.T. Rosen and J. Uriagereka, 1996. Integral predication. Proceedings of WCCFL XIV. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
23. Jackendoff, R., 1972. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Jackendoff, R., 1983. Semantics and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
25. Kayne, R., 1993. Toward a modular theory of auxiliary selection. Studia Linguistica 47, 3-31.
26. Moro, A., 1995. A small clause analysis for possessive constructions: Evidence from Italian syntax. SLE Workshop on the syntax of possession and the verb have, Leiden.
27. Pollock, J.-Y., 1989. Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20, 365-424.
28. Ritter, E., and S.T. Rosen, 1993. Deriving causation. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11, 519-555.
29. Schafer, R., 1995. Location dependence and the derivation of subjects in 'have'-predication. SLE Workshop on the syntax of possession and the verb have, Leiden.
30. Shlonsky, U., 1987. Null and displaced subjects. Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
31. Sportiche, D., 1988. A theory of floating quantifiers and its corollaries for constituent structure. Linguistic Inquiry 19, 425-449.
32. Tellier, C., 1990. Underived nominals and the projection principle: Inherent possessors. Proceedings of NELS 20, 472-486. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
33. Tremblay, M., 1991. Possession and datives: Binary branching from the lexicon to syntax. Ph.D. Dissertation, McGill University.
34. Van Voorst, J., 1988. Event structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
35. Van Valin, Robert D. Jr. 1993. A synopsis of role and reference grammar. In: Robert D. Van Valin, Jr. (ed.), Advances in role and reference grammar, 1-164. Amsterdam: Benjamins.