Human-centered design of engineering applications: Success factors from a case study in the automotive industry

Human Factors and Ergonomics In Manufacturing

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 421-443

  Schulze, Hartmut ^a   Brau, Henning ^a   Haasis, Siegmar ^a   Weyrich, Michael ^a   Rhatje, Tobias ^a  

^a DAIMLER AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOMOTIVE ENGINEERING; AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; FACTORY AUTOMATION; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; PLANNING; PRODUCTION ENGINEERING;

COMPUTER AIDED PLANNING (CAP); DIGITAL FACTORY; HUMAN CENTERED DESIGN; PRODUCTION PLANNING;

HUMAN ENGINEERING;

EID: 28044473185     PISSN: 10908471     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hfm.20036     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Akoumianakis, D., & Stephanidis, C. (2003). Blending scenarios of use and informal argumentation to facilitate unversal access: Experience with the universal access assessment workshop method. Behaviour & Information Technology, 4, 227-244.
2. Anderson, J.R., Kushmerick, N., & Lebiere, C. (1993). The Tower of Hanoi and goal structures. In J.R. Anderson (Ed.), Rules of the mind (pp. 121-142). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Boedker, S. (1991). Through the interface. A human activity approach to user interface design. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Brau, H., Schulze, H., Weyrich, M., & Haasis, S. (2003). Participative design of IT-system implementation - Exemplified by digital production planning in the automobile industry. In H. Luczak & K.J. Zink (Eds.), Human factors in organizational design and management VII, Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Human Factors in Organizational Design and Management (pp. 359-364). Santa Monica, CA: IEA Press.
5. Carus, U., & Schulze, H. (1995). The method of experience-guided working and its significance for initial and continuing vocational learning. In G. Kraayvanger, F. van den Krogt, T. Reubsaet, & J. Warmerdam (Eds.), Work and learning: Opportunities and risks (pp. 93-106). Nijmegen: ITS.
6. Damodaran, L. (1996). User involvement in the systems design process - A practical guide for users. Behaviour & Information Technology, 15, 363-377.
7. Dreyfus, H.L., & Dreyfus, S.E. (1986). Mind over machine. New York: The Free Press.
8. Eason, K. (2001). Changing perspectives on the organizational consequences of information technology. Behaviour & Information Technology, 5, 323-328.
9. Fjeld, M., Lauche, K., Bichsel, M., Voorhorst, F., Krueger, H., & Rauterberg, M. (2002). Physical and virtual tools: Activity theory applied to the design of groupware. In B.A. Nardi, & D.F. Redmiles (Eds.), A special issue of computer supported cooperative work (CSCW). Activity theory and the practice of design (pp. 153-180). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
10. Holtzblatt, K., & Beyer, H. (1996). Contextual design: Principles and practice. In D. Wixon & J. Ramey (Eds.), Field methods casebook for software design. New York: Wiley.
11. Kleining, G., & Witt, H. (2000). The qualitative heuristic approach: A methodology for discovery in psychology and the social sciences. Forum Qualitative Social Research. Retrieved March 21, 2003, from http://www. qualitative-research.net/fqs-texte/1-00/1-00kleiningwitt_e.htm
12. Martin, J. (1991). Rapid application design. New York: Macmillan.
13. Moore, G. (1991). Crossing the chasm. New York: Harper Business Book.
14. Nardi, B. (1992). The use of scenarios in design. SIGCH Bulletin, 24(4), 13-14.
15. Parker, C., & Sinclair, M. (2001). User-centered design does make a difference. The case of deci-sion support systems in crop production. Behaviour & Information Technology, 6, 449-460.
16. Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks/London/New Delhi: Sage.
17. Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
18. Rosson, M.B., & Carroll, J.M. (2002). Usability engineering. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
19. Schuler, D., & Namioka, A. (1993) Participatory design, principles and practices. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Schulze, H., Schnall, J., Weyrich, M., & Haasis, S. (2003). Digital production planning - A field of work for industrial psychologists. In S. Bagnara, A. Rizzo, S. Pozzi, S. Rizzo, & L. Save (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of Human Aspects of Advanced Manufacturing: Agility & Hybrid Automation (pp. 147-156). Rome.
21. Shneiderman, B., & Hochheiser, H. (2001). Universal usability as a stimulus to advanced interface design. Behaviour & Information Technology, 5, 367-376.
22. Standish Group. (1994). The chaos report. Retrieved January 18, 2004, from http://www.pm2go.com/sample_research/index.php
23. Standish Group. (1999). A recipe for success. Retrieved January 18, 2004, from http://www.pm2go.com/sample_research/index.php
24. Standish Group. (2001). Extreme chaos. Retrieved January 18, 2004, from http://www.pm2go.com/sample_research/index.php
25. Stapleton, J. (1997). DSDM, dynamic systems development method. Guildford, UK: Biddls Ltd.
26. Sundin, A., & Medbo, L. (2003). Computer visualization and participatory ergonomics as methods in workplace design. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 13, 1-17.
27. Tudhope, D., Beynon-Davies, P., & Mackay, H. (2000). Prototyping Praxis: Constructing computer systems and building belief. Human-Computer Interaction, 15, 353-383.
28. Unger, S. (2003). Driving the digital factory: DaimlerChrysler's design automation push. Paper presented at the Fourth Annual Computerwofid Premier 100 IT Leaders Conference, February, Scottsdale, AZ.
29. van den Anker, F. (2003). Scenariosωork. Wageningen: Ponsen & Looijen.
30. van der Linden, D., Sonnentag, S., Frese, M., & van Dyck, C. (2001). Exploration strategies, performance, and error consequences when learning a complex computer task. Behaviour & Information Technology, 20(3), 189-198.
31. Weber, W.G. (1997). Collective action regulation. Common task orientation and common objectification in advanced manufacturing systems. In Proceedings from Experience to Innovation, Proceeding of IEA '97 (Vol. 1, pp. 283-285). Helsinki: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health.
32. Weidenhaupt, K., Pohl, K., Jarke, M., & Haumer, P. (1998). Scenarios in development: Current practice. IEEE Software, 15(2), 34-45.
33. Weyrich, M., Cai, J., & Berger, U. (2004). Standardization of machining process planning in power-train production using CAD-based IT-tool. Paper presented at PRO-VE'03, 4th IFIP Working Conference on Virtual Enterprises, October, Lugano, Italy.
34. Xie, Y., & Salvendy, G. (2003). Awareness support for asynchronous engineering collaboration. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 13, 97-113.