An evolutionary testbed for software technology evaluation

Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 3-11

  Lindvall, Mikael ^b   Rus, Ioana ^b   Shull, Forrest ^b   Zelkowitz, Marvin ^b   Donzelli, Paolo ^a   Memon, Atif ^a   Basili, Victor ^a   Costa, Patricia ^b   Tvedt, Roseanne ^b   Hochstein, Lorin ^a   Asgari, Sima ^a   Ackermann, Chris ^b   Pech, Dan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b Fraunhofer USA Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 28044460547     PISSN: 16145046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11334-005-0007-z     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Basili VR, Green S, Laitenberger O, Lanubile F, Shull F, Sorumgaard S, Zelkowitz MV (1996) The empirical investigation of perspective-based reading. J Empir Softw Eng 1(2):133-164
2. Basili VR, McGarry FE, Pajerski R, Zelkowitz MV (2002) Lessons learned from 25 years of process improvement: The rise and fall of the NASA Software Engineering Laboratory. In: IEEE Computer Society and ACM international conference on software engineering (ICSE 2002), pp 69-79
3. Basili V, Donzelli P, Asgari S (2004) Modelling dependability - The unified model of dependability. University of Maryland, Technical Report CS-TR-46-01
4. Boehm B, Bhuta J, Garlan D, Gradman E, Huang L, Lam A, Madachy R, Medvidovic N, Meyer K, Meyers S, Perez G, Reinholtz K, Roshandel R, Rouquette N (2004) Using empirical testbeds to accelerate technology maturity and transition: The SCRover experience. In: 2004 international symposium on empirical software engineering (ISESE'04), pp 117-126
5. Dennis G (2003) TSAFE: Building a trusted computing base for air traffic control software. Masters Thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MA
6. Erzberger H, Paielli RA (2002) Concept for next generation air traffic control system. Air Traffic Control Q 10(4):355-378
7. Kitchenham BA, Dyba T, Jorgensen M (2004) Evidence-based software engineering. In: Proceedings of the 26th international conference on software engineering, pp 273-281
8. Murphy GC, Notkin D, Sullivan K (1995) Software reflexion models: bridging the gap between source and high-level models. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGSOFT symposium on the foundations of software engineering. ACM Press, New York, pp 18-28
9. Regnell B, Runeson P, Thelin T (2000) Are the perspectives really different? - further experimentation on scenario-based reading of requirements. J Empir Softw Eng 5(4):331-356
10. Schroeder PJ, Bolaki P, Gopu V (2004) Comparing the fault detection effectiveness of N-way and random test suites. In: Proceedings of the 2004 international symposium on empirical software engineering, Redondo Beach, CA, pp 49-59
11. Shull F, Basili V, Carver J, Maldonado JC, Travassos GH, Mendonça M, Fabbri S (2002) Replicating software engineering experiments: addressing the tacit knowledge problem. In: International symposium on empirical software engineering (ISESE-02) Nara, Japan
12. Travassos GH, Shull F, Fredericks M, Basili VR (1999) Detecting defects in object-oriented designs: Using reading techniques to increase software quality. In: Proceedings of the conference on object-oriented programming, systems, languages, and applications (OOPSLA)
13. Tesoriero Tvedt R, Costa P, Lindvall M (2002) Does the code match the design? A process for architecture evaluation. In: Proceedings of the international conference on software maintenance, pp 393-401