Toupee or not toupee? The role of instructional set, centrality, and relevance in change blindness

Visual Cognition

Volumn 12, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 1528-1543

  Pearson, Pauline M ^a   Schaefer, Evelyn G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WINNIPEG   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE TRACKING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRANSITIONAL BLINDNESS; VISUAL ADAPTATION; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION; VISUOMOTOR COORDINATION;

EID: 28044456325     PISSN: 13506285     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13506280444000814     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Aginsky, V., & Taff, M. J. (2000). How are different properties of a scene encoded in visual memory? Visual Cognition, 7(1/2/3), 147-162.
2. Agostinelli, G., Sherman, S. J., Fazio, R. H., & Hearst, E. S. (1986). Detecting and identifying change: Additions versus deletions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 445-454.
3. Beck, M. R., & Levin, D. T. (2003). The role of representational volatility in recognizing pre- and postchange objects. Perception and Psychophysics, 65, 458-468.
4. Becklen, R., & Cervone, D. (1983). Selective looking and the noticing of unexpected events. Memory and Cognition, 11, 601-608.
5. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-147.
6. Biederman, I., & Cooper, E. C. (1991). Priming contour-deleted images: Evidence for intermediate representations in visual object recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 393-419.
7. Bridgeman, B., Hendry, D., & Stark, L. (1975). Failure to detect displacements of the visual world during saccadic eye movements. Vision Research, 15, 719-722.
8. Egeth, H. E., & Yantis, S. (1997). Visual attention: Control, representation and time course. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 269-297.
9. Gauthier, I., James, T. W., Curby, K. M. & Taff, M. J. (2003). The influence of conceptual knowledge on visual discrimination. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 507-523.
10. Goldstone, R. L., Lippa, Y. & Shiffrin, R. M. (2001). Altering object representations through category learning. Cognition, 78, 27-43.
11. Grimes, J. (1996). On the failure to detect changes in scenes across saccades. In K. Atkins (Ed.), Perception (pp. 89-109). New York: Oxford University Press.
12. Harman, K. L., Humphrey, G. K., & Goodale, M. A. (1999). Active manual control of object views facilitates visual recognition. Current Biology, 9, 1315-1318.
13. Hayhoe, M. M. (2000). Vision using routines: A functional account of vision. Visual Cognition, 7(1/ 2/3), 43-64.
14. Henderson, J. M., & Hollingworth, A. (1999). The role of fixation position in detecting scene changes across saccades. Psychological Science, 10, 438-443.
15. Hollingworth, A., & Henderson, J. M. (2000). Semantic informativeness mediates the detection of changes in natural scenes. Visual Cognition, 7(1/2/3), 213-235.
16. Hollingworth, A., & Henderson, J. M. (2002). Accurate visual memory for previously attended objects in natural scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 113-136.
17. James, K. H., Humphrey, G. K., Villis, T., Corrie, B., Baddour, R., & Goodale, M. A. (2002). Active and passive learning of three-dimensional object structure within an immersive virtual reality environment. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 34, 383-390.
18. James, K. H., Humphrey, G. K., Villis, T., Corrie, B., & Goodale, M. A. (2001). Active and passive object recognition in a virtual environment. Journal of Vision, 1, 292.
19. Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
20. Klein, R., Kingstone, A., & Pontefract, A. (1992). Orienting of visual attention. In K. Rayner (Ed.), Eye movements and visual cognition: Scene perception and reading (pp. 46-65). New York: Springer.
21. Levin, D. T., & Simons, D. J. (1997). Failure to detect changes to attended objects in motion pictures. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 501-506.
22. Mondy, S., & Coltheart, V. (2000). Detection and identification of change in naturalistic scenes. Visual Cognition, 7(1/2/3), 281-296.
23. Neisser, U. (1979). The control of information pickup in selective looking. In A. D. Pick (Ed.), Perception and its development: A tribute to Eleanor J. Gibson (pp. 201-219). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
24. Neisser, U., & Becklin, R. (1975). Selective looking: Attending to visually specified events. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 480-494.
25. O'Regan, J. K. (2003). Change blindness. In L. Nadel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of cognitive science (Vol. 1, pp. 486-490). London: Nature Publishing Group.
26. Pashler, H. (1988). Familiarity and visual change detection. Perception and Psychophysics, 44, 369-378.
27. Phillips, W. (1974). On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory. Perception and Psychophysics, 44, 369-378.
28. Pringle, H. L., Irwin, D. E., Kramer, A. F., & Atchley, P. (2001). The role of attentional breadth in perceptual change detection. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 89-95.
29. Rensink, R. A. (2000). Seeing, sensing and scrutinizing. Vision Research, 40, 1469-1487.
30. Rensink, R. A. (2002). Change detection. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 245-277.
31. Rensink, R. A., O'Regan, K., & Clark, J. M. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8, 368-373.
32. Scholl, B. J. (2000). Attenuated change blindness for exogenously attended items in a flicker paradigm. Visual Cognition, 7(1/2/3), 377-396.
33. Shore, D., & Klein, R. (2000). The effects of scene inversion on change blindness. Journal of General Psychology, 127, 27-43.
34. Simons, D. J. (1996). In sight, out of mind: When object representations fail. Psychological Science, 7, 301-305.
35. Simons, D. J., & Chabris, C. F. (1999). Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception, 28, 1059-1074.
36. Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1997). Change blindness. Trends in Cognitive Science, 1, 261-267.
37. Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1998). Failure to detect changes to people in a real-world interaction. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 644-649.
38. Theeuwes, J. (1994). Endogenous and exogenous control of visual selection. Perception, 23, 429-440.
39. Wallis, G., & Bülthoff, H. (2000). What's scene and not seen: Influences of movement and task upon what we see. Visual Cognition, 7(1/2/3), 175-190.
40. Werner, S., & Thies, B. (2000). Is "change blindness" attenuated by domain-specific expertise? An expertnovices comparison of change detection in football images. Visual Cognition, 7(1/2/3), 163-173.
41. Yarbus, A. (1967). Eye movement and vision. New York: Plenum Press.
42. Zelinsky, G. J. (1998). Detecting changes between scenes: A similarity-based theory using iconic representations (Tech. Rep. No. CNS-98-01). University of Illinois, Cognitive Neuroscience Group: Champaign, IL.