How do we make sense of the future?

Journal of Futures Studies

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 45-60

  Aaltonen, Mika ^a,c   Barth, Theodor ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

^b SINTEF TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIETY   (Norway)

^c NONE   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 28044455196     PISSN: 10276084     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. Aaltonen, M. 2003. "Allowing Complexity in the Puzzle of Strategic Sensemaking". In: Organisational Complexity. Keskinen, A. & Aaltonen, M. & Mitleton-Kelly, E. Foreword by Stuart Kauffman. FFRC Publications 6/2006, 14-38.
2. Abelson, R. 1976. "Script processing in Attitude Formation and Decision-making." In: Cognition and Social Behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Ansoff, I. 1975. "Managing Strategic Surprise by Response to Weak Signals." California Management Review 18(2): 21-33.
4. Arbnor, I. & B. Bjerke. 1997. Methodology for Creating Business Knowledge. London: Sage.
5. Arendt, Hannah. 2003. Vita Activa order von tätigen Leben. Taschenbuchsonderausg, Piper Serie, München: Piper.
6. Argyris, C. & D. A. Schön. 1978. Organizational Learning: a Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
7. Ashby, W.R. 1956. An Introduction to Cybernetics. Part Two: Variety, London: Methuen.
8. Axelrod, R & M. Cohen. 1999. Harnessing Complexity: Organizational Implications of a Scientific Frontier. New York: The Free Press.
9. Barth, F. 1992. Towards Greater Naturalism in Conceptualising Societies. Conceptualising Society. Adam Kuper. London: Routledge.
10. Barth, T. 2001. "The Role of Human and Social Capital - Complex Issues Raised by the OECD." SINTEF, Living Knowledge & Kunnskaping, N0102.
11. _. 2004. "Civility and Dialogue: a Rejoinder to Busekist." Security Dialogue 35(1): 99-103.
12. Bennett, C. 1988. "Dissipation, Information, Complexity, and Organization." in Emerging Syntheses in Science, ed. Pines, D., New York: Addison-Wesley.
13. Bogner, W. C. & P. S. Barr. 2000. "Making Sense in Hypercompetitive Environments: A Cognitive Explanation for Persistence of High Velocity Competition." Organization Science 11(2): 337-370.
14. Boisot, M. 2003. "Is There Complexity Beyond the Reach of Strategy?" In: Complex Systems and Evolutionary Perspectives on Organisations, The Application of Complexity Theory to Organisations. Amsterdam: Pergamon.
15. Czarniawska, B. 1997. Narrating the organization: Dramas of Institutional Identity. London: University of Chicago Press.
16. _. 1999. Writing Management Organization Theory as a Literary Genre. Oxford University Press.
17. Deleuze, G. 1990. [1969] The Logic of Sense. London & New York: Continuum.
18. Dervin, B., L. Foreman-Wernet & E. Layterbach. 2002. Sense-Making Methodology. Reader. New Jersey: Hampton Press Inc.
19. Fiske, S. & S. Taylor. 1991. Social Cognition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
20. Gell-Mann, M. 1995. "What Is Complexity?" Complexity 1(1).
21. Glenn, J. C. 2003. "Introduction". In: Futures Research Methodology - V2.0. AC/UNU Millennium Project.
22. Glenn, J. C. & T.J. Gordon. 2003. Futures Research Methodology - V2.0. AC/UNU Millennium Project.
23. Goffman. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organisation of Experience. Cambridge (Mas.): Harvard University Press.
24. Lewin, K. 1996. [1948, -51] Resolving Social Conflicts & Field theory in Social Science. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
25. Lewin, R. & B. Regine. 1999. The Soul at Work. Orion.
26. Marc, J.G. & J.P. Olsen. 1976. Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations. Bergen: Universitetsfor-laget.
27. Massumi, B. 2002. Parables for the Virtual Durham & London: Duke University Press.
28. Mintzberg, H., B. Ahlstrand & J. Lampel. 1998. Strategy Safari. Prentice Hall.
29. Mittleton-Kelly, E. 2003. Complex Systems and Evolutionary Perspectives on Organisations. The Application of Complexity Theory to Organisations. Amsterdam: Pergamon.
30. Porac, J.F., H. Thomas & C. Baden-Fuller. 1989. "Competitive Groups as Cognitive Communities: The Case of Scottish Knitwear Manufacturers." Journal of Management Studies 26:397-416.
31. Ragin, C. 1987. The Comparative Method: Moving beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press.
32. Sanders, E. B. 2001. "N. Virtuosos of Experience Domain". In: Proceedings of 2001 IDSA Education Conference.
33. Senge, P. 1990. The Fifth Discipline: The Art & Practice of the Learning Organization. New York Doubleday Currency.
34. Shaw, P. 1997. "Intervening in the Shadow Systems of Organizations: Consulting from a Complexity Perspective." Journal of Organizational Change Management 10(3): 235-250.
35. Searle, J. R. 1983. Intentionality, an Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge [Cambridgesnire] ; New York: Cambridge University Press.
36. Snowden, D. 2002. "Complex Acts of Knowing: Paradox and Descriptive Self Awareness." Journal of Knowledge Management 6(2): 100-111.
37. _. 2004. "Innovation as an Objective of Knowledge Management. Part I the Landscape of Management." In press.
38. Stacey, R. 2001. Complex Responsive Processes in Organizations. London: Routledge.
39. Stacey, R. D., D. Griffin & P. Shaw. 2000. Complexity Management. Fad or Radical Challenge to Systems Thinking? London & New York: Routledge.
40. Streatfield, P. J. 2001. The Paradox of Control in Organizations. London & New York: Routledge.
41. Wallerstein, I. 1991. Unthinking Social Science: The Limits of Nineteenth-Century Paradigms. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
42. _. 1996. Open the Social Sciences: Report of the Gulbenkian Commission on the Restructuring of the Social Sciences. Stanford Calif: Stanford University Press.
43. Weick, K. E. 1982. "Management of Organizational Change among Loosely Coupled Elements." In: Change in Organizations. San Fransisco:Jossey-Bass.
44. _. 1995. Sensemaking in Organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
45. _. 2001. Making Sense of the Organization. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
46. Woodside, A. G. 2001. "Editorial: Sense Making in Marketing Organizations and Consumer Psychology: Theory and Practice." Psychology & Marketing 18(5): 415-421.