An analysis of Web image queries for search

Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting

Volumn 40, Issue , 2003, Pages 340-348

  Pu, Hsiao Tieh ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 28044442403     PISSN: 15508390     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/meet.1450400142     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Chen, H. (2001). An analysis of image queries in the field of art history. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(3), 260-273.
2. Chien, L.-F., & Pu, H.-T. (1996). Important issues on Chinese information retrieval. Computational Linguistics and Chinese Language Processing, 1(1), 205-221.
3. Enser, P.G.B. (1995). Progress in documentation: Pictorial information retrieval. Journal of Documentation, 51(2), 126-70.
4. Enser, P.G.M., & McGregor, C. (1993). Analysis of visual information retrieval queries. British Library Research and Development Report, 6104.
5. Fidel, R. (1997). The image retrieval task: Implications for the design and evaluation of image databases. The New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 3, 181-199.
6. Goodrum, A., & Spink, A. (2001). Image searching on the Excite web search engine. Information Processing and Management, 37(2), 295-312.
7. Google (2003). Image Search Help. http://www.google.com/help/faq_images. html
8. Hastings, S. (1995). Query categories in a study of intellectual access to digitized art images. Proceedings of the ASIS 58th Annual Meeting, 32, 3-8.
9. Jansen, B. J., & Pooch, U. (2001). A review of web searching studies and a framework for future research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 52(3), 235-246.
10. Jansen, B. J., Spink, A., & Saracevic, T. (2000). Real life, real users, and real needs: A study and analysis of user queries on the web. Information Processing and Management, 36(2), 207-227.
11. Jorgensen, C. (1998). Attributes of images in describing tasks. Information Processing & Management, 34(2/3), 161-74.
12. Keister, L. (1994). User types and queries: Impact on image access systems. Proceedings of the ASJS 57th Annual Meeting, 31, 7-22.
13. Markey, K. (1988). Access to iconographical research collections. Library Trends, 37(2), 154-174.
14. Markkula, M., & Sormunen, E. (2000). End-user searching challenges indexing practics in the digital newspaper photo archive. Information Retrieval, 1, 259-285.
15. Ornager, S. (1997). Image retrieval: Theoretial and empirical user studies on accessing information in images. Proceedings of the ASIS 60th Annual Meeting, 34, 202-211.
16. Pu, Hsiao-Tieh, Chuang, Shui-Lung, & Yang, Chyan. (2002). Subject categorization of query terms for exploring Web users' search interests. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 53(8), 617-630.
17. Rasmussen, E. (1997). Indexing images. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 32, 169-196.
18. Rui, Y., Huang, T.S., & Chang, S.F. (1999). Image retrieval: Current techniques, promising directions and open issues. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 10, 1-23.
19. Silverstein, C., Henzinger, M., Marais, H,. & Moricz, M. (1999). Analysis of a very large Web search engine query log. SIGIR Forum, 33(1), 6-12.
20. Smith, J., & Chang, S. (1997). An image and video search engine for the world wide web, In Sethi, I., & Jain, R., Storage and Retrieval for Image and Video Databases V, Proceedings of SPlE, 3022, 84-95.
21. Tomaiuolo, N.G. (2002). When image is everything. Searcher, 10(1). http://www.infotoday.com/searcher/jan02/tomaiuolo.htm