Assessment for learning? Thinking outside the (black) box

Cambridge Journal of Education

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 213-224

  Hargreaves, Eleanore ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27944489521     PISSN: 0305764X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03057640500146880     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Askew, S. & Lodge, C. (2000) Gifts, ping-pong and loops - linking feedback and learning, in: S. Askew (Ed.) Feedback for learning (London, RoutledgeFalmer).
2. Assessment Reform Group (1999) Assessment for learning: beyond the black box (Cambridge, School of Education).
3. Assessment Reform Group (2002) Assessment for learning: 10 principles (London, Assessment Reform Group).
4. Black, P. & Wiliam, D. (1998) Inside the black box (London, King's College).
5. Clarke, S. (2001) Unlocking formative assessment (London, Hodder & Stoughton).
6. Dann, R. (2002) Promoting assessment as learning: improving the learning process (London, RoutledgeFalmer).
7. Galloway, D., Armstrong, D. & Tomlinson, S. (1994) The assessment of special educational needs: whose problem? (London, Longman).
8. Gipps, C., McCallum, B. & Hargreaves, E. (2000) What makes a good primary school teacher? Expert classroom strategies (London, RoutledgeFalmer).
9. Hargreaves, D. (2001) A future for the school curriculum: QCA annual conference speech. Available online at: www.qca.org.uk/ca/14-19/dh_speech.asp (accessed August 2003).
10. Johnston, P. (1997) Knowing literacy: constructive literacy assessment (York, ME, Stenhouse).
11. Miliband, D. (2003, June 1) Every schoolchild is special, The Observer. Available online at: http://observer.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,6903,968001, 00.html (accessed August 2003).
12. Nitko, A. (1995) Curriculum-based continuous assessment: a framework for concepts, procedures and policy, Assessment in Education, 2(3), 321-237.
13. Plowden Report (1967) Children and their primary schools (London, HMSO).
14. Sadler, D. R. (1989) Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems, Instructional Science, 18, 119-144.
15. Serafini, F. (2001) Three paradigms of assessment: measurement, procedure, and inquiry, The Reading Teacher, 54(4), 384-393.
16. Sfard, A. (1998) On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing just one, Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4-13.
17. Shepard, L. (2000) The role of assessment in a learning culture, Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4-14.
18. Skinner, B. (1969) Contingencies of reinforcement. A theoretical analysis (New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts).
19. Torrance, H. & Pryor, J. (1998) Investigating formative assessment (Buckingham, Open University Press).
20. Watkins, C. (2003) Learning: a sense-makers' guide (London, ATL).
21. Watkins, C., with Carnell, E., Lodge, C., Wagner, P. & Whalley, C. (2001) Learning about learning enhances performance, ISIN Research Matters, 13, 1-8.
22. Watkins, C., Carnell, E., Lodge, C., Wagner, P. & Whalley, C. (2002) Effective learning, ISIN Research Matters, 17, 1-8.
23. Weeden, P., Winter, J. & Broadfoot, P. (2002) Assessment: what's in it for schools? (London, RoutledgeFalmer).
24. Wells, G. (1984) The meaning makers (Portsmouth, NH, Heinemann).