Sponsorship and fund-raising in New Zealand schools: Implications for health

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 331-336

  Richards, Rose ^a   Darling, H ^a   Reeder, A I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE; ARTICLE; CARBOHYDRATE DIET; CONTROLLED STUDY; COOPERATION; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH PROMOTION; HIGH SCHOOL; HUMAN; LAW; LIPID DIET; MARKETING; NEW ZEALAND; POLICY; PRIMARY SCHOOL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF REPORT;

EID: 27944461474     PISSN: 13260200     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-842X.2005.tb00203.x     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Wylie C, King J. How Do Effective Schools Manage Their Finances? [funding study released page on the Internet]. Wellington (NZ): New Zealand School Trustees Association; 2004 [cited 6 October 2004]. Available from: http://www.nzsta.org.nz/wFrameset_Content.asp?PageID= 100002644&LevelOne=100002644.
2. Marketing Social Change. Wellington (NZ): Health Sponsorship Council; 2001.
3. Kenway J, Bullen E. Promiscuous corporations: desiring schoolchildren. In: Consuming Children: Education - Entertainment - Advertising. Buckingham (UK): Open University Press; 2001. p. 91-120.
4. Cimmins J, Horn M. Sponsorship: from management ego trip to marketing success. J Advertising Res. 1996;36(4):11-19.
5. Molnar A, Reaves JA. What should we teach? Buy me! Buy Me!: Fourth annual report on commercialism in schools. Educ Leadership. 2001;59(2):1-9.
6. Molnar A. Cashing In On Kids: The Second Annual Report On Trends In Schoolhouse Commercialism [EPSL Education Policy Studies Laboratory:CERU page on the Internet]. Temple (AZ): Arizona State University; 1999 [cited 2004 October 6]. Available from: http://www.asu.edu/educ/epsl/CERU/Annual%20reports/cace-99-21.htm
7. Feuerstein A. Selling our schools? Principals' views on schoolhouse commercialism and school-business interactions. Educ Admin Q. 2001;37(3):322-71.
8. Molnar A. Looking for Funds in All the Wrong Places: Exclusive Agreements and Incentive Programs may be Doing More Harm Than Good [EPSL Education Policy Studies Laboratory:CERU page on the Internet]. Temple (AZ): Arizona State University; 2000 [cited 2004 October 6]. Available from: http://www.asu.edu/educ/epsl/CERU/Documents/cace-00-04.htm
9. French SA, Story M, Fulkerson JA. School food policies and practices: a state-wide survey of secondary school principals. J Am Diet Assoc. 2002;102(12):1785-9.
10. Wechsler H, Brener ND, Kyester S, Miller C. Food service and foods and beverages available at school: results from the school health policies and programs study 2000. J Sch Health. 2001;71(7):313-24.
11. Nestle M. Soft drink "pouring rights": marketing empty calories. Public Health Rep. 2000;115:308-19.
12. Fried EJ, Nestle M. The growing political movement against soft drinks in schools. J Am Med Assoc. 2002;288(17):2181.
13. Wiehe S, Lynch H, Park K. Sugar high: the marketing of soft drinks to America's schoolchildren. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2004;158(3):209-11.
14. Turnbull A, Barry D, Wickens K, Crane J. Changes in body mass index in 11-12 year old children in Hawkes Bay, New Zealand (1989-2000). J Paediatr Child Health. 2004;40:33-7.
15. Carter M-A, Swinburn B. Measuring the 'obesogenic' food environment in New Zealand primary schools. Health Prom Int. 2004;19(1):15-20.
16. Lytle LA, Seifert S, Greenstein J, McGovern P. How do children's eating patterns and food choices change over time? Results from a cohort study. Am J Health Prom. 2000;14(4):222-8.
17. One news/AAP. McDonald's Health Role Panned. [News Health Headlines page on the Internet]. Television New Zealand. Wellington (NZ): TVNZ; 2004 [cited 2004 October 6]. Available from: http://tvnz.co.nz/view/news_health_story_skin/435656%3fformat=html
18. Crooks DL. Trading nutrition for education: nutritional status and the sale of snack foods in an Eastern Kentucky School. Med Anthropology Q. 2003;17(2):182-99.
19. Glegg A. Supping with the devil? Fundraising, sponsorship, and the Canadian public school system. Inter J Educ Reform. 1997;6(2):139-46.
20. Molnar A. Corporate Involvement in Schools: Time for a More Critical Look. [EPSL Education Policy Studies LaboratorylCERU page on the Internet online]: Temple (A-Z): Arizona State University; 2000 [cited 2004 October 6]. Available from: http://www.asu.edu/educ/epsl/CERU/Documents/cace-01-01.html
21. Murry SR. Should commercial sponsorship be used to subsidize athletic programs? J Phys Educ Rec Dance. 2002;73:9.