Prestige, centrality, and learning: A social network analysis of an online class

Communication Education

Volumn 54, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 254-261

  Russo, Tracy C ^a   Koesten, Joy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Affective Learning; Cognitive Learning; Network Centrality; Network Prestige; Online Learning; Social Network Analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 27944451469     PISSN: 03634523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03634520500356394     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Althaus, S. L. (1997). Computer-mediated communication in the university classroom: An experiment with on-line discussions. Communication Education, 46, 158-174.
2. Anderson, J. F. (1979). Teacher immediacy as a predictor of teaching effectiveness. Communication Yearbook, 3, 543-559.
3. Baldwin, T. T., Bedell, M., & Johnson, J. J. (1997). Social networks in a team-based MBA program: Effects on student satisfaction and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 1369-1397.
4. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
5. Brass, D. J. (1981). Structural relationships, job characteristics, and worker satisfaction and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26, 331-348.
6. Chory, R. M., & McCroskey, J. C. (1999). The relationship between teacher management communication style and affective learning. Communication Quarterly, 47, 1-11.
7. Christophel, D. (1990). The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39, 323-340.
8. Haythornthwaite, C. (2000). Online personal networks: Size, composition and media use among distance learners. New Media & Society, 2, 195-226.
9. Kearney, P. (1994). Affective learning. In R. B. Rubin, P. Palmgreen, & H. E. Sypher (Eds.), Communication research measures: A sourcebook (pp. 81-85). New York: The Guilford Press.
10. Knoke, D., & Burt, R. S. (1983). Prominence. In R. S. Burt & M. Miner (Eds.), Applied network analysis: A methodological introduction (pp. 195-222). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
11. Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook II. Affective domain. New York: David McKay.
12. LaRose, R., & Whitten, P. (2000). Re-thinking instructional immediacy for Web courses: A social cognitive exploration. Communication Education, 49, 320-338.
13. Marshall, A. A., & Stohl, C. (1993). Participating as participation: A network approach. Communication Monographs, 60(2), 137-157.
14. Palonen, T., & Hakkarainen, K. (2000). Patterns of interaction in computer-supported learning: A social network analysis. In B. Fishman & S. O'Connor-Divelbiss (Eds.), Fourth international conference of the learning sciences (pp. 334-339). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Richmond, V. P., Gorham, J. S., & McCroskey, J. C. (1987). The relationship between selected immediacy behaviors and cognitive learning. In M. L. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication yearbook 10 (pp. 574-590). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
16. Roberts, K. H., & O'Reilly, C. A., III (1979). Some correlates of communication roles in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 22, 42-57.
17. Shaw, M. E. (1964). Communication networks. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, 1 (pp. 111-147). New York: Academic Press.
18. Sparrowe, R. T., Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Kraimer, M. L. (2001). Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 316-325.
19. Tapola, A., Hakkarainen, K., Syri, J., Lipponen, L., Palonen, T., & Niemivirta, M. (2001). Motivation and participation in inquiry learning with a networked learning environment. Paper presented at the Conference of the Learning Science. Retrieved May 1, 2005, from http://www.11.unimaas.nl/euro- cscl/presentations.htm
20. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.