Qualitative modelling of kinematic robots for fault diagnosis

International Journal of Production Research

Volumn 43, Issue 11, 2005, Pages 2277-2290

  Liu, H ^a   Coghill, G M ^a   Xu, H Y ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^b HUAZHONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Fault diagnosis; Qualitative modeling; Robotics

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; REMEDIATION; ROBOTS;

KINEMATIC ROBOTS; QUALITATIVE MODELING; UNIT CIRCLES (UC);

PRODUCTION ENGINEERING;

EID: 27944450763     PISSN: 00207543     EISSN: 1366588X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207540500032129     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Blanke, M., Kinnaert, M., Lunze, J. and Staroswiecki, M., Diagnosis and Fault-Tolerant Control, 2003 (Springer: Berlin).
2. De Kleer, J. and Williams, B.C., Diagnosing multiple faults. Artificial Intelligence, 1987 32, 100-117.
3. Faltings, B., A symbolic approach to qualitative kinematics. Artif. Intell. 1992, 56, 139-170.
4. Forbus, K.D., Nielsen, P. and Faltings, B., Qualtiative kinematics: a frame, in Proceedings of IJCAI-87, 1987 pp. 430-436.
5. Kawamura, T. and Shima, M., Robust stability analysis of characteristic polynomials whose coefficients are polynomials of interval parameters. J. Math. Sys. Estimat. Contr., 1996, 6, 1-12.
6. Kramer, G.A., A geometric constraint engine. Artif. Intell. 1992, 58, 327-360.
7. Liu, H. and Coghill, G.M., Connecting quantitative data and qualitative states for robotic systems, in Proceedings of the 28th ASME Biennial Mechanisms and Robotics Conference, Salt City, USA, September 2004a. ASME: DETC2004-57172.
8. Liu, H. and Coghill, G.M., Qualitative modelling of planar robots, in Proceedings of the 16th European Conference in Aritificial Intelligence, Valencia, Spain, August 2004.
9. Liu, J., Spatial reasoning about robot compliant movements and optimal paths in qualitatively modelled environments. Int. J. Robot. Res. 1996, 15, 181-210.
10. McDermott, D., A temporal logic for reasoning about processes and plan. Cognitive Sci., 1982, 6, 101-155.
11. Nielsen, P.E., A qualitative approach to rigid body mechanics. PhD thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1988.
12. Oliver, P., Orrnsby, A. and Nakata, K., Occupancy array-based kinematic reasoning, in Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Qualitative Reasoning, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands 1995, pp. 148-155.
13. Patton, R., Frank, P. and Clark, R., Fault Diagnosis in Dynamic Systems (Theory and Applications) 1989 (Prentice Hall: London).
14. Polycarpou, M.M. and Trunov, A., Learning approach to nonlinear fault diagnosis: detectability analysis. IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., 2000 45, 806-812.
15. Rieger, C. and Grinberg, M., The declarative representation and procedural simulation of casuality in physical mechanisms, in Proceedings of the 5th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Cambridge, MA, USA, August, 1977.
16. Schroder, J., Modelling, State Observation and Diagnosis of Quantised Systems, 2003 (Springer: Berlin).
17. Stahovich, T.T., Davis, R. and Shrob, H., Qualitative rigid-body mechanics. Artif. Intell., 2000, 119, 19-60.
18. Visinsky, M.L., Cavallaro, J.M. and Walker, I.D., A dynamic fault tolerance framework for remote robots. IEEE Trans. robot. Automat., 1995, 11, 477-490.