Applying the affordance conception of traits: A person perception study

Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Volumn 28, Issue 10, 2002, Pages 1327-1334

  Mignon, Astrid ^a   Mollaret, Patrick ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CLERMONT AUVERGNE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE REIMS CHAMPAGNE ARDENNE   (France)

^c Enseignante Universitaire SHS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 23044534790     PISSN: 01461672     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/014616702236825     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258-290.
2. Bassili, J. N. (Ed.). (1989). Traits as action categories versus traits as person attributes in social cognition. In On line cognition in person perception (pp. 61-89). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3. Beauvois, J. L. (1990). L'acceptabilité sociale et la connaissance évaluative [Social acceptability and evaluative knowledge]. Connexions, 56, 7-16.
4. Beauvois, J. L. (1995). La connaissance des utilités sociales [The knowledge of social utility]. Psychologie française 40, 375-388
5. Beauvois, J. L., & Dubois, N. (1992). Traits as evaluative categories. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/European Bulletin of Cognitive Psychology, 12, 253-270.
6. Beauvois, J. L., & Dubois, N. (2000). Affordances in social judgment: Experimental proof of why it is a mistake to ignore how others behave towards a target and look solely at how the target behaves. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 59, 16-33.
7. Beauvois, J. L., Dubois, N., & Peeters, G. (1999). L'évaluation personnologique [Person evaluation]. In J. L. Beauvois, N. Dubois, & W. Doise (Eds.), La construction sociale de la personne[The social construction of the person]. Grenoble, France: PUG.
8. Berry, D. S. (1990). Taking people at face value: Evidence for kernel of truth hypothesis. Social Cognition, 8, 343-361.
9. Borkenau, P., & Liebler, A. (1992). Trait inferences: Sources of validity at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 645-657.
10. Borkenau, P., & Liebler, A. (1993). Convergence of stranger ratings of personality and intelligence with self-ratings and measured intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 546-553.
11. Borkenau, P., & Liebler, A. (1995). Observable attributes as manifestations and cues of personality and intelligence. Journal of Personality, 63, 1-25.
12. Cambon, L. (in press). La désirabilité et l'utilitésocial des professions et des professionnels [Desirability and social utility of occupations and professionals]. In J. L. Beauvois, R. V. Joule, & J. M. Monteil (Eds.), Perspectives cognitives et conduites sociales [Cognitive views and social behaviors] (IX). Rennes, France: Rennes University Press
13. Dubois, N., & Tarquinio, C. (1998). Le traitement de l'information évaluative par des professionnels de l'évaluation sociale [Evaluative information processing by professional of social evaluation]. Revue internationale de psychologie sociale, 11, 99-122.
14. Funder, D. C. (1987). Errors and mistakes: Evaluating the accuracy of social judgment. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 75-90.
15. Funder, D. C. (1995). On accuracy of personality judgment: A realistic approach. Psychological Review, 102, 652-670.
16. Funder, D. C., & Dobroth, K. M. (1987). Differences between traits: Properties associated with interjudge agreement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 409-418.
17. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
18. Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26-34.
19. John, O. P. (1990). The "Big Five" factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 66-100). New York: Guilford.
20. Kenny, D.A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York: the Guilford Press
21. Kenny, D. A., Albright, L., Malloy, T. E., & Kashy, D. A. (1994). Consensus in interpersonal perception: acquaintance and the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116, 245-258.
22. Kenny, D. A., Horner, C., Kashy, D.A., & Chu, L. (1992). Consensus at zero acquaintance: Replication, behavioral cues, and stability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 88-97.
23. Kenny, D. A., & La Voie, L. (1984). The Social Relations Model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 8, 141-181.
24. Kiesler, D. J., & Schmidt, J. A. (1993). The impact message inventory: Form IIA octant scale version. Richmond: Virginia Commonwealth University.
25. Lamiell, J. T. (2000). A periodic table of personality elements? The "Big Five" and Trait "psychology" in critical perspective. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 20, 1-24.
26. Leary, T. (1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality: A functional theory and methodology for personality evaluation. New York: Ronald Press.
27. Le Poultier, F., & Guéguen, N. (1991). De l'utilité sociale des traits et des théories implicites de la personnalité [On the social utility of traits and implicit personality theories]. Psychologie Française, 36, 25-34.
28. Leyens, J.-Ph. (1998). Solomon Asch, what did you do to social psychology? Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 11, 13-17.
29. Marcus, D. K., & Leatherwood, J. C. (1998). The interpersonal circle at zero acquaintance: A social relations analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 32, 297-313.
30. McArthur, L. Z., & Baron, R. M. (1983). Toward an ecological theory of social perception. Psychological Review, 90, 215-238.
31. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81-90.
32. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1989). The structure of interpersonal traits: Wiggins's circumplex and five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Personality, 56, 586-595.
33. Mollaret, P. (1998). Redéfinir les traits [Redefining traits]. L'Année Psychologique, 98, 545-567.
34. Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 574-583.
35. Norman, W. T., & Goldberg, L. R. (1966). Raters, ratees, and randomness in personality structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 681-691.
36. Paulhus, D. L., & Bruce, M. N. (1992). The effect of acquaintanceship on the validity of personality impressions: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 816-824.
37. Paulhus, D. L., & Reynolds, S. (1995). Enhancing target variance in personality impressions: Highlighting the person in person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1233-1242.
38. Paunonen, S. V. (1989). Consensus in personality judgments: Moderating effects of target-rater acquaintanceship and behavior observability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 823-833.
39. Peabody, D. (1967). Trait inferences: Evaluative and descriptive aspects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Monograph, 7, (4, Serial No. 644).
40. Reeder, G. D., & Brewer, M. B. (1979). A schematic model of dispositional attribution in interpersonal perception. Psychological Review, 56, 61-79.
41. Watson, D. (1989). Strangers' ratings of the five robust personality factors: Evidence of surprising convergence with self-report. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 120-128.
42. Wiggins, J. S. (1979). A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 395-412.
43. Zebrowitz, L. A., & Collins, M. A. (1997). Accurate social perception at zero acquaintance: The affordances of a Gibsonian approach. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 204-223.