Erratum: Genetic diversity within and among four south european native horse breeds based on microsatellite dna analysis: Implications for conservation (Journal of Heredity 96: 6 DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esi123);Genetic diversity within and among four south European native horse breeds based on microsatellite DNA analysis: Implications for conservation

Journal of Heredity

Volumn 96, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 670-678

  Solis, A ^a   Jugo, B M ^a   Meriaux J C ^b   Iriondo, M ^a   Mazon L I ^a   Aguirre, A I ^a   Vicario, A ^a   Estomba, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE BASQUE COUNTRY UPV EHU   (Spain)

^b LABOGENA   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ANIMAL GENETICS; ARTICLE; BOTTLENECK POPULATION; BREED DIFFERENCE; BREEDING; COMPARATIVE GENE MAPPING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DETERMINATION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC DISTANCE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOTYPE; HETEROZYGOSITY; HORSE; MEAT; MICROSATELLITE MARKER; MOLECULAR GENETICS; MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENETIC TREE; POPULATION SIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUTHERN EUROPE; STRAIN DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALIA; EQUUS CABALLUS;

EID: 27944434956     PISSN: 00221503     EISSN: 14657333     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esx031     Document Type: Erratum

References (55)

1. Achmann R, Huber T, Wallner B, Dovc P, Müller M, and Brem G, 2001. Base substitutions in the sequences flanking microsatellite markers HMS3 and ASB2 interfere with parentage testing in the Lipizzan horse. Anim Genet 32:52.
2. Ausubel FM, Brent R, Kingston RE, Moore DD, Scidman GG, Smith JA, and Struhl R, 1987. Current protocols in molecular biology. New York: Green Publishing Associates and Wiley-Interscience.
3. Binns MM, Holmes NG, Holliman A, and Scott AM, 1995. The identification of polymorphic microsatellite loci in the horse and their use in thoroughbred parentage testing. Br Vet J 151:9-15.
4. Bizkaiko Foru Aldundia, 1997. Pottoka. Euskal Herriko Poneya [in Basque]. Bilbao: Bizkaiko Foru Aldundia.
5. Bjørnstad G, Gunby E, and Røed KH, 2000. Genetic structure of Norwegian horse breeds. J Anim Breed Genet 117:307-317.
6. Bjørnstad G and Røed KH, 2001. Breed demarcation and potential for breed allocation of horses assessed by microsatellite markers. Anim Genet 32:59-65.
7. Bökönyi S, 1984. Horse. In: Evolution of domesticated animals (Mason IL, ed). New York: Longman; 162-173.
8. Bowling AT, Eggleston-Stott ML, Byrns G, Clark RS, Dileanis S, and Wictum E, 1997. Validation of microsatellite markers for routine horse parentage testing. Anim Genet 28:247-252.
9. Breen M, Downs P, Irvin Z, and Bell K, 1994. Intrageneric amplification of horse microsatellite markers with emphasis on the Przewalski's horse (E. przewalskii). Anim Genet 25:401-405.
10. Breen M, Lindgren G, Binns MM, Norman J, Irvin Z, Bell K, Sandberg K, and Ellegren H, 1997. Genetical and physical assignments of equine microsatellites-first integration of anchored markers in horse genome mapping. Mamm Genome 8:267-273.
11. Bruford MW, Bradley DG, and Luikart G, 2003. DNA markers reveal the complexity of livestock domestication. Nat Rev Genet 4:900-910.
12. Caballero A and Toro MA, 2002. Analysis of genetic diversity for the management of conserved subdivided populations. Conserv Genet 3:289-299.
13. Cañon J, Checa ML, Carleos C, Vega-Plá JL, Vallejo M, and Dunner S, 2000. The genetic structure of Spanish Celtic horse breeds inferred from microsatellite data. Anim Genet 31:39-48.
14. Carvajal-Carmona LG, Bermúdez N, Olivera-Angel M, Estrada L, Ossa J, Bedaya G, and Ruiz-Linares A, 2003. Abundant mtDNA diversity and ancestral admixture in Colombian criollo cattle (Bos taurus). Genetics 165:1457-1463.
15. Cornuet JM and Luikart G, 1996. Description and evaluation of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics 144:2001-2014.
16. Colling D and Kelly S, 1996. Survey of microsatellite (STR) types in nine North American equine breeds. Anim Genet 27:32.
17. Donezar J, 1952. Caballos navarros [in Spanish]. I Congreso Veterinario de Zootecnia. Pamplona.
18. Ellegren H, Johansson M, Sandberg K, and Andersson L, 1992. Cloning of highly polymorphic microsatellites in the horse. Anim Genet 23:133-142.
19. Felsenstein J, 1989. PHYLIP (phylogeny inference package), version 3.57c. Seattle: University of Washington.
20. Garcia-Dory MA, 1987. Evolución reciente de la ganadería en España [in Spanish]. Quercus 107:6-9.
21. Giovambattista G, Ripoli MV, Peral-Garcia P, and Bouzat JL, 2001. Indigenous domestic breeds as reservoirs of genetic diversity: the Argentinean Creole cattle. Anim Genet 32:240-247.
22. Goldstein DB and Schlötterer C, 1999. Microsatellites: evolution and applications. New York: Oxford University Press.
23. Goudet J, 1995. FSTAT (version 1.2): a computer program to calculate F-statistics. J Hered 86:485-486.
24. Guerin G, Bertaud M, and Amigues Y, 1994. Characterisation of seven new horse microsatellites: HMS1, HMS2, HMS3, HMS5, HMS6, HMS7 and HMS8. Anim Genet 25:62.
25. Horin P, Cothran EG, Trktková K, Marti E, Glasnak V, Henney P, Kyskocil M, and Casany S, 1998. Polymorphism of Old Kladruber horses, a surviving but endangered baroque breed. Eur J Immunogenet 25:357-363.
26. Jansen T, Forster P, Levine MA, Oelke H, Hurles M, Renfrew C, Weber J, and Olek K, 2002. Mitochondrial DNA and the origins of the domestic horse. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:10905-10910.
27. Jordana J and Parés PM, 1999. Relaciones genéticas entre razas ibéricas de caballos utilizando caracteres morfológicos (prototipos raciales) [in Spanish]. AGRI 26:75-94.
28. Kelly L, Postiglioni A, de Andrés DF, Vega-Plá JL, Gagliardi R, Biagetti R, and Franco J, 2002. Genetic characterisation of the Uruguayan Creole horse and analysis of relationship among horse breeds. Res Vet Sci 72:69-73.
29. Laval G, San Cristobal M, and Chevalet C, 2002. Measuring genetic distances between breeds: use of some distances in various short term evolution models. Genet Sel Evol 34:481-507.
30. Legarra A, Ugarte T, and Ruiz de Zarate C, 2000. Adecuación de la estructura de datos del caballo de carne en Alava para una estima de componentes de varianza [in Spanish]. ITEA 96:311-317.
31. Luikart G, Allendorf FW, Cornuet JM, and Sherwin WB, 1998. Distortion of allele frequency distributions provides a test for recent population bottlenecks. J Hered 89:238-247.
32. Luikart G and Cornuet JM, 1998. Empirical evaluation of a test for identifying recently bottlenecked populations from allele frequency data. Conserv Biol 12:228-237.
33. Marklund S, Ellegren H, Eriksson S, Sandberg K, and Andersson L, 1994. Parentage testing and linkage analysis in the horse using a set of highly polymorphic microsatellites. Anim Genet 25:19-23.
34. Marshall TC, Slate J, Kruuk L, and Pemberton JM, 1998. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol Ecol 7:639-655.
35. Nei M, 1972. Genetic distances between populations. Am Nat 106:283-292.
36. Notter DR, 1999. The importance of genetic diversity in livestock populations in the future. J Anim Sci 77:61-69.
37. Ollivier L, 1999. Situation and justification of the conservation of animal genetics resources in Europe. Naturzale 14:17-27.
38. Pérez KG, 1999. Mountain horses in Alava. Naturzale 14:145-150.
39. Pérez de Muniain A, 1999. The Navarre pony and Burguete. Characterization and retrieval plan. Naturzale 14:151-156.
40. Petit RM, El Mousadik A, and Pons O, 1998. Identifying populations for conservation on the basis of genetic markers. Conserv Biol 12:844-855.
41. Piry S, Luikart G, and Cornuet JM, 1999. Bottleneck: a computer program for detecting recent effective population size reductions from allele data frequencies. J Hered 90:502-503.
42. Raymond M and Rousset F, 1995. GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86:248-249.
43. Reynolds J, Weir BS, and Cockerham C, 1983. Estimation of the coancestry coefficient: basis for a short-term genetic distance. Genetics 105:767-779.
44. Rodero E, 2001. Interpretación de la información contenida en el listado para la vigilancia de las razas autóctonas españolas [in Spanish]. El Arca 5:15-56.
45. Rohlf FJ, 1988. NTSYS-pc: numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis System. Setauket, NY: Exeter Software.
46. Ruane J, 1999. Selecting breeds for conservation. In: Gene banks and the conservation of farm animals genetic resources (Ondenbroek JK, ed).
47. Lelystad, The Netherlands: DLO Institute for Animal Science and Health; 59-74.
48. Takezaki N and Nei M, 1996. Genetic distances and reconstruction of phylogenetic trees from microsatellite DNA. Genetics 144:389-399.
49. Tozaki T, Takezaki N, Hasegawa T, Ishida N, Kurosawa M, Tomita M, Saitou N, and Mukoyama H, 2003. Microsatellite variation in Japanese and Asian horses and their phylogenetic relationship using a European horse outgroup. J Hered 94:374-380.
50. van Haeringen H, Bowling AT, Scott ML, Lenstra JA, and Zwaagstra KA, 1994. A highly polymorphic horse microsatellite locus: VHL20. Anim Genet 23:207.
51. Vega-Plá JL and Rodriguez-Gallardo PP, 1998. Investigación biológica de la paternidad en caballos con secuencias microsatélites de ADN [in Spanish]. Med Mil 54:143-147.
52. Vilá C, Leonard JA, Göthreström A, Marklund S, Sandberg K, Lidén K, Wayne RK, and Ellegren H, 2001. Widespread origins of domestic horse lineages. Science 291:474-477.
53. Weir BS and Cockerham CC, 1984. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358-1370.
54. Weitzman M, 1992. On diversity. Q J Econ 107:363-405.
55. Weitzman M, 1993. What to preserve? An application of diversity theory to crane conservation. Q J Econ 108:157-183.