Effect of the interfacial adhesion on the tensile and impact properties of carbon fiber reinforced polypropylene matrices

Materials Research

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 81-89

  Nogueira, Clara Leal ^a,b   De Paiva, Jane Maria Faulstich ^a   Rezende, Mirabel Cerqueira ^a  

^a INSTITUTO TECNOLÓGICO DE AERONÁUTICA   (Brazil)

^b INSTITUTO DE AERONÁUTICA E ESPAÇO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Carbon fiber; Composites; Mechanical properties; Polypropylene

Indexed keywords

AVIATION; CARBON FIBER REINFORCED PLASTICS; COPOLYMERS; LAMINATES; MECHANICAL PROPERTIES; MOLDING; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; THERMOPLASTICS;

CARBON FIBER; HOT COMPRESSION MOLDING; STACKING CARBON; THERMOPLASTIC COMPOSITES;

POLYPROPYLENES;

EID: 27844596298     PISSN: 15161439     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1516-14392005000100015     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Roder H, Vogl. Progress Polymer Science. 1999: 24:1205-1215.
2. Moore D R, Cervenka, A. Future requirements in the characterization of continuous flber-reinforced polymeric composites. Pure. Applied. Chemistry. 2002; 74(41:601-628.
3. Van De Ven E C, Wijskamp S, Lamers E A D, Akkerman R. Polymer Processing Society, 18, Portugal. 2002.
4. Cabral-Fonseca S, Paiva M C, Nunes J P, Bernardo C A. A novel technique for the intetfacial characterisation of glass flbre-polypropylene systems. Polymer Testing. 2003; 22:907-913.
5. Gao S L, Kim J K. Cooling rate influences in carbon fibre/PEEK composites. Composites Part A. 2000; 31:517-530.
6. Smith W. In: Delaware Composites Design Encyclopedia, v.3. USA, Technomic Publishing Co. Inc., p. 15-86, 1990.
7. Schwartz MM. Composite Materials: Properties, Nondestructive testing, and Repair. USA. Prentice Hall PTR, p. 43-52, 1997.
8. Domb M M, Hansen J S. Development of free-edge effect during processing of fibre-reinforced semicrystalline thermoplastic composites. In: Proceedings of 34th SDM Conference, USA, 1994, p. 463-471.
9. Hazen J R, Composites Technology. 2000; 6(3):6-20.
10. Gao S -L, Kim J -K. Cooling rate influences in carbon fibre/PEEK composites. Part III: impact damage performance. Composites, Part A. 2001; 32:775-785.
11. Matthews F L, Rawlings R D. Composite Materials: engineering and science, 2.ed. Boca Raton. Woodhead Publishing Ltd and CRC Press, p. 3-15, 1999.
12. Buchman A, Isayev A I. SAMPE Journal. 1991; 27(4):19-27.
13. Piggott M R. Carbon. 1989; 27(5):657-662.
14. Thanomsilp C, Hogg P J. Penetration impact resistance of hybrid composites based on commingled yarn fabrics. Composites Science and Technology. 2003; 63(3-4):467-482.
15. Dear J P, Brown S A. Impact damage processes in reinforced polymeric materials. Composites Part A. 2003; 34:411-420.
16. Belingardi G, Vadori R. Low velocity impact tests of laminate glassfiber-epoxy matrix composite material plates International. International Journal of Impact and Engineering. 2002; 27(2):213-229.
17. Shyr T -W, Pan Y-H. Impact resistance and damage characteristics of composite laminates. Composite Structures. 2003; 62(2):193-203.
18. Jang B Z. Advanced Polymer Composites: Principles and Applications. ASM International, Materials Park, USA, p. 297, 1994
19. Smith B W. Fractography for continuous fiber composites. In: Engineered Materials Handbook, v.1. USA, Metals Park, OH:ASM, p. 786-793, 1987.
20. Master J E. Basic Failure Modes of Continuous Fiber Composites. In: Engineered Materials Handbook, v. 1. USA, Metals Park, OH:ASM, p. 781-785, 1987.