Adoption and diffusion of encoded archival description

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 56, Issue 13, 2005, Pages 1427-1437

  Yakel, Elizabeth ^a   Kim, Jihyun ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENCODED ARCHIVAL DESCRIPTION (EAD); MACHINE-READABLE CATALOGING (MARC); THE US ARCHIVAL COMMUNITY;

DIFFUSION; STANDARDIZATION;

ENCODING (SYMBOLS);

EID: 27844576177     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.20236     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bouché, N.L. (1997). Implementing EAD in the Yale University library encoded archival description. American Archivist, 60(4), 408-419.
2. California Digital Library, (n.d.). Online archive of California. Retrieved June 30, 2005, from http://www.oac.cdlib.org
3. Cohen, W.M., & Levinthal, D.A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152.
4. Cloud, P. (1986). RLIN, AMC, and retrospective conversion: A case study. The Midwestern Archivist, XI(2), 125-134.
5. Fichman, R.G., & Kemerer, C. (1997). The assimilation of process software innovations: An organizational learning perspective. Management Science, 43(10), 1345-1363.
6. Hensen, S.L. (1997). NISTF II and EAD: The evolution of archival description. American Archivist, 60(3), 284-296.
7. Kennedy, A.M. (1983). The adoption and diffusion of new industrial products. European Journal of Marketing, 17, 31-88.
8. Kiesling, K. (1997). EAD as an archival descriptive standard. American Archivist, 60(3), 344-354.
9. Kim, J. (2004). EAD encoding and display: A content analysis. Journal of Archival Organization, 2(3), 41-55.
10. Lacy, M.A., & St. Clair, M.A. (1997). EAD testing and implementation at the Library of Congress encoded archival description. American Archivist, 60(4), 420-435.
11. Marshall, J.A. (2002). The impact of EAD adoption on archival programs: A pilot survey of early implementers. Journal of Archival Organization, 1(1), 35-55.
12. Martin, L.M. (1994). Viewing the field: A literature review and survey of the use of U.S. MARC AMC in U.S. academic libraries. American Archivist, 57(3), 482-497.
13. Meissner, D.E. (1997). First things first: Reengineering finding aids for implementation of EAD. encoded archival description at the Minnesota Historical Society. American Archivist, 60(4), 372-387.
14. Miller, F.M. (1990) Arranging and describing archives and manuscripts. Chicago: Society of American Archivists.
15. Minks, G.L.B., & Curtis, L. (2002). The University of Tulsa digitization initiative: A blueprint for EAD implementation in the small academic library. Amigos Fellowship Final Report. Retrieved June 30, 2005, from http://www.amigos.org/fellowship/2002_blueprint.pdf
16. Pitti, D.V. (1997). Encoded archival description: The development of an encoding standard for archival finding aids. American Archivist, 60(3), 268-283.
17. Prom, C.J. (2001). Extending the capabilities of the EAD cookbook. OCLC Systems & Services, 17(2), 89-95.
18. Prom, C.J. (2002). The EAD cookbook: A survey and usability study. American Archivist, 65(2), 257-275.
19. Research Libraries Group, (n.d.). Archival resources. Retrieved June 30, 2005, from http://www.rlg.org/en/page.php?Page_ID=120&dataGo.x= 11&dataGo.y=16
20. Rogers, E.M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
21. Roth, J.M. (2001). Serving up EAD: An exploratory study on the deployment and utilization of encoded archival description finding aids. American Archivist, 64(2), 214-237.
22. Shaw, E.J. (2001). Rethinking the EAD: Balancing flexibility and interoperability. New Review of Information Technology, 7, 117-131.
23. Society of American Archivists. (1996). 1996 Salary survey. Chicago: Author.
24. Society of American Archivists and Office of the Library of Congress. (1998). Encoded archival description tag library: Version 1.0. Chicago: Society of American Archivists.
25. Stout, L., & Baird, D. (1984). Automation in North American college and university archives: A survey. American Archivist, 47(4), 394-404.
26. Tatem, J.M. (1998). EAD: Obstacles to implementation, opportunities for understanding encoded archival description. Archival Issues, 23(2), 155-169.