Alternative male mating strategies are intuitive to women

Current Research in Social Psychology

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2005, Pages

  Kruger, Daniel J ^a   Fisher, Maryanne L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b SAINT MARY S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27844571909     PISSN: 10887423     EISSN: 10887423     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Ardener, E. W., Ardener, S. G., & Warmington, W.A. (1960). Plantation and village in the Cameroons. London: Oxford University Press.
2. Belsky, J., Steinberg, L., & Draper, P. (1991). Childhood experience, interpersonal development, and reproductive strategy: An evolutionary theory of socialization. Child Development, 62, 647-670.
3. Buss, D. M. (1994). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating. New York: Basic Books.
4. Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex difference in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12, 1-49.
5. Clark, R.D., & Hatfield, E. (1989). Gender differences in receptivity to sexual offers. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 2, 39-55.
6. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.
7. Draper, P., & Belsky, J. (1990). Personality development in evolutionary perspective. Journal of Personality, 58, 141-61.
8. Draper, P., & Harpending, H. (1982). Father absence and reproductive strategy: An evolutionary perspective. Journal of Anthropological Research, 38, 252-73.
9. Draper, P., & Harpending, H. (1988). A sociobiological perspective on the development of human reproductive strategies. In K. B. MacDonald (ed.), Sociobiological Perspectives on Human Development (pp. 340-72). New York: Springer.
10. Feingold, A. (1992). Gender differences in mate selection preferences: A test of the parental investment model. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 125-139.
11. Fisher, H. (1992). Anatomy of love. New York: Norton & Company.
12. Fisher, R. A. (1930). The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. Gangestad, S.W., &. Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Brain and Behavioral Sciences, 23, 573-644.
14. Geary, D. (1998). Male, female: The evolution of human sex differences. Washington DC: American Psychological Association,.
15. Hill, K. & Hurtado, A. M. (1996). Ache life history: The ecology and demography of a foraging people. Hawthorne NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
16. Jobling, I. (2002). Byron as cad. Philosophy and Literature, 26, 296-311.
17. Jones, E. (1981). The life and work of Sigmund Freud. New York: Perseus Books Group.
18. Kenrick, D.T., Groth, G.E., & Trost, M. R. (1993). Integrating evolutionary and social exchange perspectives on relationships: Effects of gender, self-appraisal, and involvement level on mate selection criteria. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 64, 951-969.
19. Kenrick, D. T. & Simpson, J. A. (1997). Why social psychology and evolutionary psychology need one another. In J. Simpson and D. Kenrick, (eds.), Evolutionary Social Psychology (pp. 1-20). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Kruger, D. J., Fisher, M., & Jobling, I. (2003). Proper and dark heroes as dads and cads: Alternative mating strategies in British Romantic literature, Human Nature, 14, 305-317.
21. Oliver, M. B. & Hyde, J. S. (1993). Gender differences in sexuality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 29-51.
22. Richard, F. D., Bond, C. F., & Stokes-Zoota, J. L. (2003). One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology, 7, 331-363.
23. Salmon, C., & Symons, D. (2001) Warrior lovers: Erotic fiction, evolution and female sexuality. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
24. Scott, W. (1969). The heart of Mid-Lothian. [1818]. New York: Holt.
25. Scott, W. (1986). Waverley. [1814]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.
27. Toothaker, L. E. (1993). Multiple comparison procedures. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
28. Townsend, J. M. (1987). Mate selection criteria: A pilot study. Ethology and Sociobiology, 10, 173-206.
29. Townsend, J. M., & Roberts, L.W. (1993). Gender differences in mate selection among law students: Divergence and convergence of criteria. Journal of Psychology, 29, 507-528.
30. Trivers, R. (1985). Social evolution. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin Cummings Publishing Co
31. Wiederman, M. W., & Allgeier, E. R. (1992). Gender differences in mate selection criteria: Sociobiological or socioeconomic explanation? Ethology and Sociobiology 13, 115-124.
32. Zimbardo, P., & Boyd, J. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1271-1288.