The family of origin parachute model: Landing safely in adult romantic relationships

Family Relations

Volumn 54, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 254-264

  Busby, Dean M ^a   Gardner, Brandt C ^b   Taniguchi, Narumi ^b  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Attitudes; Family of origin; Marriage; Parents; Relationships

Indexed keywords

EID: 27844548577     PISSN: 01976664     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0197-6664.2005.00020.x     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Ahrons, C. R., & Tanner, J. L. (2003). Adult children and their fathers: Relationship changes 20 years after parental divorce. Family Relations, 52, 340-351.
2. Amato, P. R., & DeBoer, D. D. (2001). The transmission of marital instability across generations: Relationship skills or commitment to marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 1038-1051.
3. Arbuckle, J. L., & Wothke, W. (1999). AMOS 4.0 user's guide. Chicago: SPSS.
4. Bachman, D., Elfrink, J., & Vazzana, G. (1996). Tracking the progress of email versus snail-mail. Marketing Research, 8(2), 31-35.
5. Bradbury, T. N., & Fincham, F. D. (1991). A conceptual model of marital interaction. In G. J. O. Fletcher & F. D. Fincham (Eds.), Cognition in close relationships (pp. 128-147). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Burr, W. R., Leigh, G. K. Day, R. & Constantine, J. (1979). Symbolic interaction and the family. In W. R. Burr, R. Hill, F. I. Nye, & I. L. Reiss (Eds.), Contemporary theories about the family (Vol. 2, pp. 42-111). New York: Free Press.
7. Busby, D. M. (2000). Physical and sexual abuse in the family: Filling knowledge gaps fir therapists. Iowa City, IA: Geist & Russell.
8. Busby, D. M., Holman, T. B., & Taniguchi, N. (2001). RELATE: Relationship evaluation of the individual, family, cultural, and couple contexts. Family Relations, 50, 308-316.
9. Carson, J. L., & Parke, R. D. (1996). Reciprocal negative affect in parent-child interactions and children's peer competency. Child Development, 67, 2217-2226.
10. Conger, R. D., Cui, M., Bryant, C. M., & Elder, G. H., Jr. (2000). Competence in early adult romantic relationships: A developmental perspective on family influences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 224-237.
11. Delsol, C., Margolin, G., & John, R. S. (2003). A typology of maritally violent men and correlates of violence in a community sample. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 635-651.
12. Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Murphy, B. C. (1996). Parents' reactions to children's negative emotions: Relations to children's social competence and comforting behavior. Child Development, 67, 2227-2247.
13. Franz, C. E., McClelland, D., & Weinberger, J. (1991). Childhood antecedents of conventional social accomplishment in midlife adults: A 26 year prospective study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 586-595.
14. Glenn, N. D., & Kramer, K. B. (1987). The marriages and divorces of the children of divorce. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, 811-825.
15. Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam.
16. Gottman, D. (1999). The marriage clinic: A scientifically based marital therapy. New York: Norton.
17. Gottman, J., & Declair, J. (1997). Raising an emotionally intelligent child: The heart of parenting. New York: Simon and Schuster.
18. Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1994). Attachment as an organizational framework for research on close relationships. Psychological Inquiry, 5(1), 1-22.
19. Heaton, T. B. (2002). Factors contributing to increasing marital stability in the United States. Journal of Family Issues, 23, 392-409.
20. Hetherington, E. M. (2003). Intimate pathways: Changing patterns in close personal relationships across time. Family Relations, 52, 318-331.
21. Holman, T. B., & Associates. (2001). Premarital prediction of marital quality or breakup: Research, theory, and practice. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
22. Holman, T. B., Larson, J. H., & Harmer, S. L. (1994). The development and predictive validity of a new premarital assessment instrument: The PREP-aration for Marriage Questionnaire. Family Relations, 43(1), 46-52.
23. Huberty, C. J. (1984). Issues in the use and interpretation of discriminant analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 95(1), 156-171.
24. Ivey, D., Busby, D. M., & Harris, S. (2004). A comparison of three premarital education programs. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Honolulu, HI.
25. Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118(1), 3-34.
26. Kelly, E. L., & Conley, J. J. (1987). Personality and compatibility: A prospective analysis of marital stability and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 27-40.
27. Kiesler, S., & Sproull, L. S. (1986). Response effects in the electronic survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 50, 402-413.
28. Klein, D. M., & White, J. M. (1996). Family theories: An introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29. Larson, J. H., & Holman, T. B. (1994). Premarital predictors of marital quality and stability. Family Relations, 43, 228-237.
30. Leon, K. (2003). Risk and protective factors in young children's adjustment to parental divorce: A review of the research. Family Relations, 52, 258-270.
31. Lewis, R. A., & Spanier, G. B. (1979). Theorizing about quality and stability of marriage. In W. R. Burr, R. Hill, F. I. Nye, & I. L. Reiss (Eds). Contemporary theories about the family (Vol. 1, pp. 268-294). New York: Free Press.
32. Marsh, J. C. (2003). Arguments for family strengths research. Social Work, 48(2), 37-46.
33. Moore, K. A., Chalk, R., Scarpa, J., & Vandivere, S. (2002). Family strengths: Often overlooked, but real. Washington, DC: Child Trends.
34. U.S. Census Bureau. (2004). USA statistics in brief - race and Hispanic origin. Retrieved August 2, 2004, from http://www.census.gov/statab/ www/racehisp.html
35. Waters, E., Vaughn, B. E., Posada, G., & Kondo-Ikemura, K. (1995). Caregiving, cultural, and cognitive perspectives on secure-base behavior and working models: New growing points of attachment theory and research. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 60(2), 2-3.