RELATE: Relationship evaluation of the individual, family, cultural, and couple contexts

Family Relations

Volumn 50, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 308-316

  Busby, Dean M ^a   Holman, Thomas B ^b   Taniguchi, Narumi ^a  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessment; Couples; Premarital relationships

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035600227     PISSN: 01976664     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2001.00308.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. American Psychological Association. (1985). Standards for educational and psychological Testing. Washington, DC: Author.
2. Bateson, M. C. (1999, November). Intergenerational learning in a changing society. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Family Relations, Irvine, CA.
3. Boszormenyi-Nagy, I., & Krasner, B. R. (1986). Between give and take: A clinical guide to contextual therapy. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
4. Bradbury, T. N., Campbell, S. M., & Fincham, F. D. (1995). Longitudinal and behavioral analysis of masculinity and femininity in marriage. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 328-341.
5. Bradbury, T. N., & Fincham, F. D. (1987). Affect and cognition in close relationships: Towards an integrative model. Cognition and Emotion. 1, 59-87.
6. Bradbury, T. N., & Fincham, F. D. (1988). Individual difference variables in close relationships: A contextual model of marriage as an integrative framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 713-721.
7. Bradbury, T. N., & Fincham, F. D. (1991). A conceptual model of marital interaction. In G. J. O. Fletcher & F. D. Fincham (Eds.), Cognition in close relationships (pp. 128-147). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Burr, W. R., Leigh, G. K., Day, R., & Constantine, J. (1979). Symbolic interaction and the family. In W. R. Burr, R. Hill, F. I. Nye, & I. L. Reiss (Eds.), Contemporary theories about the family (Vol. 2, pp. 42-111). New York: Free Press.
9. Busby, D. M., Crane, D. R., Larson, J. H., & Christensen, C. (1995). A revision of the dyadic adjustment scale for use with distressed and nondistressed couples: Construct hierarchy and multidimensional scales. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 21, 289-308.
10. Busby, D. M., & Reichert, T. (2000). Sexual abuse in the family of origin: The influence on current relationship satisfaction. In D. M. Busby (Ed.), Physical and sexual abuse in the family: Filling knowledge gaps for therapists (pp. 1-22). Galena, IL: Geist and Russell.
11. Busby, D. M., & Taniguchi, N. (2000, November). The expansion of the Gottman model into the individual and family contexts. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Family Relations, Minneapolis, MN.
12. Carroll, J. S., Holman, T. B., Seguras-Bartholomew, G., Bird, M., & Busby, D. M. (2001). Translation and validation of the Spanish version of the RELATE questionnaire using a modified serial approach for cross-cultural translation. Family Process, 40, 211-231.
13. Comrey, A. L. (1988). Factor-analytic methods of scale development in personality and clinical psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 754-761.
14. Gottman, J. M. (1994). What predicts divorce? The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Gottman, J. M. (1999). The marriage clinic: A scientifically-based marital therapy. New York: Norton.
16. Holman, T. B., & Associates. (2000). Premarital prediction of marital quality or break up: Research, theory, and practice. New York: Plenum.
17. Holman, T. B., Busby, D. M., Doxey, C., Klein, D. M., & Loyer-Carlson, V. (1997). The Relationship Evaluation (RELATE). Provo, UT: RELATE lnstitute.
18. Holman, T. B., & Jarvis, M. O. (2000, November). Replicating and validating Gottman's couple conflict types using survey data. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Family Relations, Minneapolis, MN.
19. Holman, T. B., Larson, J. H., & Harmer, S. L. (1994). The development and predictive validity of a new premarital assessment instrument: The PREParation for Marriage Questionnaire. Family Relations, 43, 46-52.
20. Karney, B., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, methods, and research. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 3-34.
21. Karney, B. R., Bradbury, T. N., Fincham, F. D., & Sullivan, K. T. (1994). The role of negative affectivity in the association between attributions and marital satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 413-424.
22. Larson, J. H. (1998/1999, December/January). Comprehensive premarital as* sessment questionnaires: Bringing science to premarital counseling. Family Therapy News, 15, 17.
23. Larson, J. H. (2000). Should we stay together? A scientifically proven method for evaluating your relationship and improving its chances for long-term success. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24. Larson, J. H., & Holman, T. B. (1994). Premarital predictors of marital quality and stability. Family Relations, 43, 228-237.
25. Larson, J. H., Holman, T. B., Klein, D. M., Busby, D. M., Stahmann, R. F., & Peterson, D. (1995). A review of comprehensive questionnaires used in premarital education and counseling. Family Relations, 44, 245-252.
26. Levine, L. B., & Busby, D. M. (1993). Cocreating shared realities with couples. Contemporary Family Therapy: An International Journal, 15, 405-421.
27. Loyer-Carlson, V., & Busby, D. M. (2001). The RELATE User's guide. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
28. Popenoe, D., & Whitehead, B. D. (2000). The state of our unions 2000: The social health of marriage in America. New Brunswick, NJ: The National Marriage Project. Retrieved October 3, 2000 from the World Wide Web: http:// marriage.rutgers.edu
29. Schnarch, D. (1997). Passionate marriage: Keeping love and intimacy alive in committed relationships. New York: Henry Holt.
30. Spanier, G. B. (1976). Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, 15-28.
31. Taniguchi, N., & Busby, D. M. (2000, October). An expansion of the Gottman model for premarital/marital couples. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy, Denver, CO.