Modelling method comparison data

Statistical Methods in Medical Research

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 161-179

  Dunn, Graham ^a,b   Roberts, Chris ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b Sch of Epidemiol and Hlth Sci   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANALYTICAL ERROR; CALIBRATION; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW; SAMPLE; STATISTICAL MODEL;

FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; LABORATORY TECHNIQUES AND PROCEDURES; LINEAR MODELS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TECHNOLOGY, MEDICAL;

EID: 0032852308     PISSN: 09622802     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/096228099668524590     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Cheng C-L, Van Ness JW. Statistical regression with measurement error. London: Arnold, 1999.
2. Dunn G, Everitt B, Pickles A. Modelling covariances and latent variables with EQS. London: Chapman & Hall, 1993.
3. Grubbs, FE. On estimating precision of measuring instruments and product variability. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1948; 43: 243-64.
4. Shyr JY, Gleser LJ. Inference about comparative precision in linear structural relationships. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 1986; 14: 339-58.
5. Maloney CJ, Rastogi SC. Significance test for Grubbs's estimators. Biometrics 1970; 26: 671-76.
6. Dunn G. Design and analysis of reliability studies. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 1992; 1: 123-57.
7. Hahn GJ, Nelson W. A problem in the statistical comparison of measuring devices. Technometrics 1970; 12: 95-102.
8. Grubbs FE. Errors of measurement, precision, accuracy and statistical comparison of measuring instruments. Technometrics 1973; 15: 53-66.
9. Dunn G. Design and analysis of reliability studies: the statistical evaluation of measurement errors. London: Arnold, 1989.
10. Linnet K. Estimation of linear relationship between measurements of two methods with proportional errors. Statistics in Medicine 1990; 9: 1463-73.
11. Kummel CH. Reduction of observation equations which contain more than one observed quantity. The Analyst 1879; 6: 97-105.
12. Deming WE. Statistical adjustment of data. New York: John Wiley, 1943.
13. Nix ABJ, Dunstan FDJ. Maximum likelihood techniques applied to method comparison studies. Statistics in Medicine 1991; 10: 981-88.
14. Strike PW. Statistical methods in laboratory medicine. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1991.
15. Strike PW. Measurement in laboratory medicine. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1995.
16. Creasy MA. Confidence limits for the dradient in the linear functional relationship. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 1956; 18: 65-69.
17. Bentler P. EQS: structural equations manual. Los Angeles, CA: BMDP Statistical Software Inc, 1989.
18. Morton AP, Dobson AJ. Assessing agreement. Medical Journal of Australia, 1989; 150: 384-87.
19. Heywood HB. On finite sequences of real numbers. Proceedings of the Royal Society A 1931; 134: 486-510.
20. Lewis G, Pelosi AJ, Araya R, Dunn G. Measuring psychiatric disorder in the community: a standardised assessment for use by lay interviewers. Psychology and Medicine 1992; 22: 465-86.
21. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 1999; 8: 135-60.