‘They don't associate it with feminism’: In-service educators' conceptions of gender-inclusive curriculum [1]

Journal of In-Service Education

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 31-48

  Johnson, Evelyn ^a  

^a DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27844494712     PISSN: 13674587     EISSN: 17475082     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13674580300200242     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Allard, A., Cooper, M., Duncan, J., Johnson, E., and Macmillan, M., 1995. Teaching is Still a Good Job For a Woman - the influence of gender on career and life choices. South Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 23:185–194.
2. Blackmore, J., 1999. Localisation/ Globalisation and the Midwife State:strategic dilemmas for state feminism education?. Journal of Educational Policy, 14:33–54.
3. Blackmore, J., Kenway, J., Willis, S., and Rennie, L., 1996. Feminist Dilemmas:an Australian case study of a whole-school policy approach to gender reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28:253–280.
4. Connell, R., 1990. Teacher's Work, Sydney:George Allen & Unwin.
5. Cooper, M., 1994. “ Ann, Bill and Justine-cases Worth Considering:reflections on a longitudinal research project on gender in teacher education ”. In Voices–Voicing Our Agendas; Gender and Teacher Education Conference Papers Edited by:Cooper, M., Bali
6. Cornell, D., 1995. “ Rethinking the Time of Feminism ”. In Feminist Contentions:a philosophical exchange, New York:Routledge.
7. David, M., Weiner, G., and Arnot, M., 2000. “ Gender Equality and Schooling, Education Policy-making and Feminist Research in England and Wales ”. In Gender, Policy and Educational Change, Edited by:Salisbury, J., and Riddell, S., London:Routledge.
8. Day, C., 2000. Effective Leadership and Reflective Practice. Reflective Practice, 1:113–127.
9. Harding, S., 1992. After the Neutrality Ideal–Science, Politics and Strong Objectivity. Social Research, 59:567–587.
10. Harding, S., 1993. “ Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology:what is strong objectivity? ”. In Feminist Epistemologies, Edited by:Alcoff, E., and Potter, E., New York:Routledge.
11. Harding, S., Is Western Science an Ethnoscience? Challenges and Opportunities for Feminist Science Studies. paper presented at Centre for Science and Maths, Monash University
12. Hartsock, N., 1985. Money, Sex, and Power-Toward A Feminist Historical Materialism, Boston:Northeastern University Press.
13. Hartsock, N., 1987. Rethinking Modernism–Minority Versus Majority Theories. Cultural Critique, 7:187–206.
14. Henry, M., and Taylor, S., 1995. Equity and the AVC Pilots in Queensland–A Study in Policy Refraction. Australian Educational Researcher, 22:85–106.
15. Johnson, E., A Feminist Critique of Gender Inclusive Curriculum Policy in Primary Schools from 1975 to 1995. paper presented to the Annual Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Adelaide University
16. Johnson E., 1998b A Feminist Critique of Gender Inclusive Curriculum Policy in Victorian Primary Schools from 1975 to 1995 unpublished PhD thesis
17. Johnson, E., Postdeconstruction:reconstruction of journals as a methodological solution for the postmodern researcher. paper presented to the Annual Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, (in review)
18. Johnson, E., We Really Started Coming Up With a Final Product:primary practitioners' perceptions of gender-inclusive curriculum. paper presented to the Annual Conference of the Association of Curriculum Studies in Australia, Australian National University
19. Johnson, E., 2002a. “ ‘Back to the Backlash’? Primary Practitioner Discourses of Resistance to Gender Inclusive Policies ”. In Discourse:studies in the cultural politics of education (in review)
20. Johnson, E., 2002b. Gender Inclusive Policy Developments in Australia. Journal of Educational Policy, 17:1–14.
21. Johnson, E., ‘It’s Just a Part of their Framework of Equal Opportunity':primary practitioners conceptualisation of the gender-inclusive curriculum. paper presented to the Annual Conference of the Australian Association Teacher Education
22. Johnson, E., Lessons for 2003 from 1993:primary teacher standpoint on policy backlash against the gender-inclusive curriculum. paper presented to the Annual Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education
23. Johnson, E., 2002e. “ The Significance of Professional Development Ideals and Realities for the Transformative Potential of Gender Inclusive Policy in a Changing policy Context ”. In South Pacific Journal of Teacher Education (in press)
24. Lingard, B., and Douglas, P., 1999. Men Engaging Feminisms:pro-feminism, backlashes and schooling, Buckingham:Open University Press.
25. Marshall, C., 2000. Policy Discourse Analysis:negotiating gender equity. Journal of Educational Policy, 15:125–156.
26. McLeod J., 1995 Regulating Gender:feminist truths and educational reform in Victoria Since 1975, unpublished PhD thesis, Graduate School of Education Latrobe University
27. McTaggart, R., Henry, H., and Johnson, E., 1997. Traces of Participatory Action Research:reciprocity among educators. Educational Action Research, 15:123–139.
28. 1984. Curriculum Development and Planning in Victoria, Ministerial Paper Number Six, Carlton:Office of Schools Administration.
29. Ministry of Education, Victoria. 1989. Equal Opportunity Action Plan for Girls in Education; 1988-1990, Carlton:Office of Schools Administration.
30. Ministry of Education, Victoria. 1990. A Fair Go For All-Guidelines For A Genderinclusive Curriculum, Carlton:Office of Schools Administration.
31. Ministry of Education & Training, Victoria. 1991. Working for Gender Justice in Schools, Carlton:Ministerial Advisory Committee on Women and Girls.
32. Rhedding-Jones, J., 1995. What Do You Do after You've Met Poststructuralism? Research Possibilities Regarding Feminism, Ethnography and Literacy. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 27:479–500.
33. Taylor, S., 2001. Teachers' Union Activism for Gender Equity:social movements and policy processes. Australian Educational Researcher, 28:47–80.
34. Weiner, G., 1987. “ Teachers and Gender:the unacknowledged makers of educational policy ”. In Gender Issues in the Theory and Practice of Educational Administration and Policy, Edited by:Blackmore, J., and Kenway, J., Geelong:Deakin University Press.
35. Weiner, G., The Gendered Curriculum–Producing the Text:developing a poststructural feminist analysis. paper presented to the Australian Association for Research in Education Annual Conference, Fremantle
36. Weiner, K., 1988. Women Teaching for Change:gender, class and power, New York:Bergin & Garvey.
37. Yates, L., 1986. Theorising Inequality Today. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 7:119–134.
38. Yates, L., 1987a. “ Australian Research on Gender and Education 1975-1985 ”. In Australian Education Review of Recent Research, Edited by:Keeves, J., Sydney:Allen and Unwin.
39. Yates, L., 1987b. Curriculum Theory and Non-sexist Education, LaTrobe University:Unpublished PhD Thesis.
40. Yates, L., Does ‘All Students’ Include Girls? Some Reflections on Recent Educational Policy, Practice and Theory. paper presented Australian Association for Research in Education/New Zealand Association for Research in Education annual conference, New Zealand
41. Yates, L., A Tale of Sound and Fury-Signifying What? Feminism and Curriculum Policy in Australia. paper presented to the American Educational Research Association Conference
42. Yates, L., December 1991b. Gender Inclusive Curriculum, December, 41–51. New Zealand:keynote speech, New Zealand Association for Research in Education Conference.
43. Yates, L., 1993a. “ Feminism and Australian State Policy:some questions for the 1990's ”. In Feminism and Social Justice in Education-International Perspectives, Edited by:Arnot, M., and Weiler, K., London:Falmer Press.
44. Yates, L., 1993b. Feminism and Education, Melbourne:Latrobe University Press.
45. Yates, L., 1993c. The Education of Girls - Policy, Research and the Question of Gender, Melbourne:Australian Council for Educational Research.
46. Yates, L., 1993d. What Happens When Feminism is an Agenda of the State? Feminist Theory and the Case of Education Policy in Australia. Discourse; studies in the cultural politics of education, 14:17–29.