Placement of responsibility and moral reasoning in couple therapy

Journal of Family Therapy

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 352-369

  Kurri, Katja ^a   Wahlström, Jarl ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27844493333     PISSN: 01634445     EISSN: 14676427     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6427.2005.00327.x     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Andersen, T. (ed.) (1990) The Reflecting Team. Dialogues and Dialogues about Dialogues. Kent: Borgmann.
2. Avis, J. M. (1998) Commentary: does neutrality neutralize feminist awareness? A feminist response to Scheel and Ivey. Contemporary Family Therapy, 20: 323-331.
3. Bal, M. (1985) Narratology: Introduction to the Theory of Narrative. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
4. Benhabib, S. (1987) The generalised and the concrete other: the Kohlberg-Gilligan controversy and feminist theory. In S. Benhabib and D. Cornell (eds) Feminism as Critique: On the Politics of Gender (pp. 77-95). Cambridge: Polity Press.
5. Brown, J. E. (1997) The question cube: a model for developing question repertoire in training couple and family therapists. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 23: 27-40.
6. Buttny, R. (1990) Blame-account sequences in therapy: the negotiation of relational meanings. Semiotica, 78: 219-247.
7. Buttny, R. (2001) Therapeutic humor in retelling the clients' tellings. Text, 21: 303-326.
8. Card, C. (1990) Gender and moral luck. In O. Flanagan and A. Rorty (eds) Identity, Character and Morality (pp. 199-218). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Dienhart, A. (2001) Engaging men in family therapy: does the gender of the therapist make a difference? Journal of Family Therapy, 23: 21-45.
10. Donovan, M. (2003) Family therapy beyond postmodernism: some consideration on the ethical orientation of contemporary practice. Journal of Family Therapy, 25: 285-306.
11. Edwards, D. (1994) Script formulations: a study of event descriptions in conversation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13: 211-247.
12. Edwards, D. (1995) Two to tango: script formulations, dispositions and rhetorical symmetry in relationship troubles talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28: 319-350.
13. Edwards, D. (1997) Discourse and Cognition. London: Sage.
14. Edwards, D. (1999) Emotion discourse. Culture and Psychology, 5: 271-291.
15. Edwards, D. and Potter, J. (1992) Discursive Psychology. London: Sage.
16. Edwards, D. and Potter, J. (2001) Discursive psychology. In A. McHoul and M. Rapley (eds) How to Anlalyse Talk in Institutional Settings: A Casebook of Methods (pp. 12-24). London and New York: Continuum International.
17. Friedman, M. (1993) What Are Friends For? Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
18. Garfinkel, H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
19. Genette, G. (1980) Narrative Discourse. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
20. Gergen, K. (2001) Relational process for ethical outcomes. Journal of Systemic Therapies, 20: 7-10.
21. Gilligan, C. (1982) In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22. Goffman, E. (1976) Replies and responses. Language in Society, 5: 257-313.
23. Goffman, E. (1981) Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
24. Goldner, V. (1985) Feminism and family therapy. Family Process, 24: 13-47.
25. Goldner, V. (1998) The treatment of violence and victimization in intimate relationships. Family Process, 37: 263-286.
26. Grimshaw, J. (1986) Philosophy and Feminist Thinking. Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press.
27. Ivey, D. C. and Scheel, M. J. (1998) Response: the baby and the bathwater: a reply to the commentaries of Avis and Siegenthaler and Boss on neutrality and feminist perspective. Contemporary Family Therapy, 20: 341-350.
28. Keller, J. (1997) Autonomy, relationality, and feminist ethics. Hypatia, 12: 153-164.
29. Kurri, K. and Wahlström, J. (2001) Dialogical management of morality in domestic violence counseling. Feminism and Psychology, 11: 187-208.
30. Kurri, K. and Wahlström, J. (2003) Negotiating clienthood and moral order of a relationship in couple therapy. In C. Hall, K. Juhila, N. Parton and T. Pösö (eds) Constructing Clienthood in Social Work and Human Services. Interaction, Identities and Practices (pp. 62-79). London: Jessica Kingsley.
31. Leudar, I. and Antaki, C. (1996) Discourse participation, reported speech and research practices in social psychology. Theory and Psychology, 6: 5-29.
32. Newfield, S. A., Newfield, N. A., Sperry, J. A. and Smith, T. E. (2000) Ethical decision making among family therapists and individual therapists. Family Process, 39: 177-188.
33. Peräkylä, A. (1995) AIDS Counseling: Institutional Interaction and Clinical Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Potter, J. (1996) Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction. London: Sage.
35. Potter, J. (2003a) Discursive psychology: between method and paradigm. Discourse and Society, 14: 783-794.
36. Potter, J. (2003b) Discourse analysis and discursive psychology. In P. M. Camic, J. E. Rhodes and L. Yardley (eds) Qualitative Research in Psychology: Expanding Perspectives in Methodology and Design (pp. 73-94). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
37. Potter, J. and Edwards, D. (1999) Social representations and discursive psychology: from cognition to action. Culture and Psychology, 5: 447-458.
38. Potter, J. and Wetherell, M. (1987) Discourse and Social Psychology. London: Sage.
39. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A. and Jefferson, G. (1978) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. In Schenkein (ed.) Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction (pp. 7-55). New York: Academic Press.
40. Scheel, M. J. and Ivey, D. C. (1998) Neutrality and feminist perspective: can they co-exist in family therapy? Contemporary Family Therapy, 20: 315-322.
41. Seikkula, J., Arnkil, T. E. and Erikson, E. (2003) Postmodern society and social networks: open and anticipation dialogues in network meetings. Family Process, 42: 185-203.
42. Selvini-Palazzoli, M., Boscolo, L., Cecchin, G. and Prata, G. (1980) Hypothesizing, circularity, neutrality: three guidelines for the conductor of the session. Family Process, 19: 3-12.
43. Siegenthaler, A. L. and Boss, P. (1998) Commentary: a feminist perspective on the issue of neutrality in therapy: neutrality can be hazardous to the clients health. Contemporary Family Therapy, 20: 333-340.
44. Stratton, P. (2003a) Causal attributions during therapy I: Responsibility and blame. Journal of Family Therapy, 25: 136-160.
45. Stratton, P. (2003b) Causal attributions during therapy II: Reconstituted families and parental blaming. Journal of Family Therapy, 25: 161-180.
46. Swim, S. St, George, S. A. and Wulff, D. P. (2001) Process ethics: a collaborative partnership. Journal of Systemic Therapies, 20: 14-24.
47. Tomm, K. (1987) Interventive interviewing: part II. Reflexive questioning as a means to enable self-healing. Family Process, 26: 167-183.
48. Tomm, K. (1988) Interventive interviewing: part III. Intending to ask circular, trategic, or reflexive questions? Family Process, 27: 1-15.
49. Vatcher, C-A. and Bogo, M. (2001) The feminist/emotionally focused therapy practice model: an integrated approach for couple therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 27: 69-83.
50. Walker, M. U. (1998) Moral Understandings: A Feminist Study in Ethics. New York: Routledge.
51. Wall, J., Needham, T., Browning, D. S. and James, S. (1999) The ethics of relationality: the moral views of therapists engaged in marital and family therapy. Family Relations: Interdisciplinary Journal of Applied Family Studies, 48: 139-149.