Neutrality and feminist perspective: Can they co-exist in family therapy?

Contemporary Family Therapy

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 315-331

  Scheel, Michael J ^a   Ivey, David C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^b TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Family therapy; Feminist perspectives; Neutrality

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032337334     PISSN: 08922764     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/a:1022464812469     Document Type: Review

References (12)

1. Avis, J. M. (1988). Deepening awareness: A private study guide to feminism and family therapy. In L. Braverman (Ed.), A guide to feminist family therapy (pp. 15-32). New York: Harrington Park Press.
2. Bograd, M. (1988). A feminist examination of family systems models of violence against women in the family. L. In Braverman (Ed.), A guide to feminist family therapy (pp. 65-78). New York: Harrington Park Press.
3. Cecchin, G. (1987). Hypothesizing, circularity, and neutrality revisited: An invitation to curiosity. Family Process, 26, 405-413.
4. Goldner, V. (1985). Feminism and family therapy. Family Process, 24, 31-47.
5. Gottman, J., Jacobson, N., Rushe, R., Shortt, J., Babcock, J., LaTaillade, J., & Waltz, J. (1995). The relationship between heart rate reactivity, emotionally aggressive behavior, and general violence in batterers. Journal of Family Psychology, 9, 227-248.
6. Hoffman, L. (1990). Constructing realities: An art of lenses. Family Process, 29, 1-12.
7. Jacobson, N. S. (1993, October). Domestic violence: What the couples look like. Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy, Anaheim, CA.
8. Palazzoli Selvini, M., Boscolo, L., Cecchin, G., & Prata, G. (1980). Hypothesizing circularity-neutrality: Three guidelines for the conductor of the session. Family Process, 19, 3-12.
9. Philpot C. L., Brooks, G. R., Lusterman, D.-D., & Nutt, R. L. (1997, August). Bridging separate gender worlds: Why men and women clash and how therapists can bring them together. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington DC.
10. Sadler, J. Z., & Hulgus, Y. F. (1989). Hypothesizing and evidence-gathering: The nexus of understanding. Family Process, 28, 255-267.
11. Tomm, K. (1985). Circular Interviewing: a mulifaceted clinical tool. In D. Campbell & R. Draper (Eds.), Applications of systemic family therapy: The Milan method (pp. 33-45). New York: Norton.
12. Tomm, K (1987). Interventive interviewing: Part II. Reflexive questioning as a means to enable self-healing. Family Process, 26, 167-183.