Salt-responsive genes in rice revealed by cDNA microarray analysis

Cell Research

Volumn 15, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 796-810

  Chao, Dai Yin ^a,b   Luo, Yong Hai ^a,b   Shi, Min ^a   Luo, Da ^a   Lin, Hong Xuan ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

Author keywords

cDNA microarray; Rice; Salt stress; Signaling crosstalk; Transcriptome

Indexed keywords

CARBOHYDRATE; PHOSPHOTRANSFERASE; PLANT RNA; SODIUM CHLORIDE; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR;

ARTICLE; BIOSYNTHESIS; CELL AGING; DNA MICROARRAY; DNA REPAIR; DRUG EFFECT; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETICS; HOMEOSTASIS; ION TRANSPORT; METABOLISM; NORTHERN BLOTTING; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RICE;

BLOTTING, NORTHERN; CARBOHYDRATES; CELL AGING; DNA REPAIR; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; HOMEOSTASIS; ION TRANSPORT; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; ORYZA SATIVA; PHOSPHOTRANSFERASES; PHOTOSYNTHESIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RNA, PLANT; SODIUM CHLORIDE; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS;

ORYZA SATIVA;

EID: 27844483965     PISSN: 10010602     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.cr.7290349     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Boyer JS. Plant productivity and environment. Science 1982; 218:443-8.
2. Chinnusamy V, Schumaker K, Zhu JK. Molecular genetic perspectives on cross-talk and specificity in abiotic stress signalling in plants. J Exp Bot 2004; 55:225-36.
3. + antiporter gene improves salt tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat Biotechnol 2003; 21:81-5.
4. Shinozaki K, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K. Molecular responses to dehydration and low temperature: Differences and cross-talk between two stress signaling pathways. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2000; 3:217-23.
5. Seki M, Narusaka M, Abe H, et al. Monitoring the expression pattern of 1300 Arabidopsis genes under drought and cold stresses by using a full-length cDNA microarray. Plant Cell 2001; 13:61-72.
6. Fowler S, Thomashow MF. Arabidopsis transcriptome profiling indicates that multiple regulatory pathways are activated during cold acclimation in addition to the CBF cold response pathway. Plant Cell 2002; 14:1675-90.
7. Maruyama K, Sakuma Y, Kasuga M, et al. Identification of cold-inducible downstream genes of the Arabidopsis DREB1A/CBF3 transcriptional factor using two microarray systems. Plant J 2004; 38:982-93.
8. Jaglo-Ottosen KR, Gilmour SJ, Zarka DG, Schabenberger O, Thomashow MF. Arabidopsis CBF1 overexpression induces COR genes and enhances freezing tolerance. Science 1998; 280:104-6.
9. Liu Q, Kasuga M, Sakuma Y, et al. Two transcription factors, DREB1 and DREB2, with an EREBP/AP2 DNA binding domain separate two cellular signal transduction pathways in drought- and low-temperature-responsive gene expression, respectively, in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 1998; 10:1391-406.
10. Lee JT, Prasad V, Yang PT, et al. Expression of Arabidopsis CBF1 regulated by an ABA/stress promoter in transgenic tomato confers stress tolerance without affecting yield. Plant Cell Environ 2003; 26:1181-90.
11. Dubouzet JG, Sakuma Y, Ito Y, et al. OsDREB genes in rice, Oryza sativa L., encode transcription activators that function in drought-, high-salt- and cold-responsive gene expression. Plant J 2003; 33:751-63.
12. Xu D, Duan X, Wang B, et al. Expression of a Late Embryogenesis Abundant Protein Gene, HVA1, from Barley Confers Tolerance to Water Deficit and Salt Stress in Transgenic Rice. Plant Physiol 1996; 110:249-57.
13. + uptake of the shoots and roots controlling rice salt tolerance. Theor Appl Genet 2004; 108:253-60.
14. Kawasaki S, Borchert C, Deyholos M, et al. Gene expression profiles during the initial phase of salt stress in rice. Plant Cell 2001; 13:889-906.
15. Seki M, Narusaka M, Ishida J, et al. Monitoring the expression profiles of 7000 Arabidopsis genes under drought, cold and high-salinity stresses using a full-length cDNA microarray. Plant J 2002; 31:279-92.
16. Kreps JA, Wu Y, Chang HS, et al. Transcriptome changes for Arabidopsis in response to salt, osmotic, and cold stress. Plant Physiol 2002; 130:2129-41.
17. Oztur ZN, Talame V, Deyholos M, et al. Monitoring large-scale changes in transcript abundance in drought- and salt-stressed barley. Plant Mol Biol 2002; 48:551-73.
18. Wang H, Miyazaki S, Kawai K, et al. Temporal Progression of Gene Expression Responses to Salt Shock in Maize Roots. Plant Mol Biol 2003; 52: 873-91.
19. Rabbani MA, Maruyama K, Abe H, et al. Monitoring expression profiles of rice genes under cold, drought, and high-salinity stresses and abscisic acid application using cDNA microarray and RNA gel-blot analyses. Plant Physiol 2003; 133:1755-67.
20. Taji T, Seki M, Satou M, et al. Comparative genomics in salt tolerance between Arabidopsis and aRabidopsis-related halophyte salt cress using Arabidopsis microarray. Plant Physiol 2004; 135:1697-709.
21. Takahashi S, Seki M, Ishida J, et al. Monitoring the expression profiles of genes induced by hyperosmotic, high salinity, and oxidative stress and abscisic acid treatment in Arabidopsis cell culture using a full-length cDNA microarray. Plant Mol Biol 2004; 56:29-55.
22. Yale J, Bohnert HJ. Transcript expression in S. cerevisiae at high salinity. J Biol Chem 2001; 276:15996-6007.
23. Posas F, Chambers JR, Heyman JA, et al. The transcriptional response of yeast to salt stress. J Biol Chem 2000; 275:17249-55.
24. Tran LS, Nakashima K, Sakuma Y, et al. Isolation and functional analysis of Arabidopsis stress-inducible NAC transcription factors that bind to a drought-responsive cis-element in the early responsive to dehydration stress 1 promoter. Plant Cell 2004; 16:2481-98.
25. 2+.)-dependent protein kinases are induced by drought and high-salt stresses in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Gen Genet 1994; 244:331-40.
26. Saijo Y, Kinoshita N, Ishiyama K, et al. A Ca(2+)-dependent protein kinase that endows rice plants with cold- and salt-stress tolerance functions in vascular bundles. Plant Cell Physiol 2001; 42:1228-33.
27. Saijo Y, Hata S, Kyozuka J, Shimamoto K, Izui K. Over-expression of a single Ca2+-dependent protein kinase confers both cold and salt/drought tolerance on rice plants. Plant J 2002; 23:319-27.
28. Ohta M, Guo Y, Halfter U, Zhu JK. A novel domain in the protein kinase SOS2 mediates interaction with the protein phosphatase 2C AB12. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003; 100:11771-6.
29. Delumeau O, Dutta S, Brigulla M, et al. Functional and structural characterization of RsbU, a stress signaling protein phosphatase 2C.J Biol Chem 2004;279:40927-37.
30. Leonhardt N, Kwak JM, Robert N, et al. Microarray expression analyses of Arabidopsis guard cells and isolation of a recessive abscisic acid hypersensitive protein phosphatase 2C mutant. Plant Cell 2004; 16:596-615.
31. Singla-Pareek SL, Reddy MK, Sopory SK. Genetic engineering of the glyoxalase pathway in tobacco leads to enhanced salinity tolerance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003; 100:14672-7.
32. Elizabeth AB, Julia BS, Elizabeth W. In: Buchanan, BB, Gruissem, W, Jones RL Eds. Biochemistry and molecular biology of plants. Plenum Press: American society of plants philologists Rockville 2000:1168-9.
33. Zhu J, Gong Z, Zhang C, et al. OSM1/SYP61: a syntaxin protein in Arabidopsis controls abscisic acid-mediated and non-abscisic acid-mediated responses to abiotic stress. Plant Cell 2002; 14:3009-28.
34. Claes B, Dekeyser R, Villarroel R, et al. Characterization of a rice gene showing organ-specific expression in response to salt stress and drought. Plant Cell 1990; 2:19-27.
35. Garcia AB, Engler J, Iyer S, et al. Effects of Osmoprotectants upon NaCl Stress in Rice. Plant Physiol 1997; 115:159-69.
36. Zhu JK. Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants. Annu Rev PlantBiol 2002; 53:247-73.
37. Quirino BF, Noh YS, Himelblau E, Amasino RM. Molecular aspects of leaf senescence. Trends Plant Sci 2000; 5:278-82.
38. Xiong L, Yang Y. Disease resistance and abiotic stress tolerance in rice are inversely modulated by an abscisic acid-inducible mitogen-activated protein kinase. Plant Cell 2003; 15:745-59.