The influence of national culture on the perceived fairness of grading procedures: A comparison of the united states and china

Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied

Volumn 139, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 401-412

  Tata, Jasmine ^a  

^a LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Fairness; Grades; National culture

Indexed keywords

EID: 27844455563     PISSN: 00223980     EISSN: 19401019     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3200/JRLP.139.5.401-412     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Beugre, C. D. (1998). Managing fairness in organizations. Westport, CT: Quorum Books. Bies, R. J. (1987). The predicament of injustice: The management of moral outrage. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 9, pp. 289-319). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
2. Bies, R. J., & Sitkin, S. B. (1992). Explanation as legitimation: Excuse-making in organizations. In M. L. McLaughlin, M. J. Cody, & S. J. Read (Eds.), Explaining one's self to others: Reason-giving in a social context (pp. 183-198). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Birnbaum-More, P. H., & Wong, G. Y. Y. (1995). Acquisition of managerial values in the People's Republic of China and Hong Kong. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 25, 255-275.
4. Cook, T., & Campbell, D. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.
5. Coulmas, F. (1979). Poison to your soul: Thanks and apologies contrastively viewed. In F. Coulmas (Ed.), Conversational routine: Explorations in standardized communication situations and prepatterned speech (pp. 69-92). New York: Mouton.
6. Dorfman, P. W., & Howell, J. P. (1988). Dimensions of national culture and effective leadership patterns: Hofstede revisited. Advances in International Comparative Management, 3, 127-150.
7. Gabriel, K. R. (1969). Simultaneous test procedure-Some theory of multiple comparisons. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 40, 224-250.
8. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
9. Hofstede, G. (1994). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.
10. Itoi, R., Ohbuchi, K., & Fukuno, M. (1996). A cross-cultural study of preference of accounts: Relationship closeness, harm severity, and motives of account making. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 913-934.
11. Joy, V. L., & Witt, L. A. (1992). Delay of gratification as a moderator of the procedural justice-distributive justice relationship. Group & Organization Management, 17, 297-308.
12. Kravitz, D. A., & Stone, E. F. (1992). Effects of appeal procedures on procedural justice criteria. Paper presented at the Seventh Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial/Organizational Psychology, Montreal.
13. Leung, K. (1987). Some determinants of reactions to procedural models for conflict resolution: A cross-national study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 898-908.
14. Leung, K., Bond, M. H., Carment, D. W., Krishnan, L., & Liebrand, W. B. G. (1990). Effects of cultural femininity on preference for methods of conflict processing: A cross-cultural study. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 373-388.
15. Leung, K., & Lind, E. A. (1986). Procedural justice and culture: Effects of culture, gender, and investigator status on procedural preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1134-1140.
16. Lind, E. A., Kurtz, S., Musante, L., Walker, L., & Thibaut, J. (1980). Procedure and outcome effects on reactions to adjudicated resolution of conflicts of interests. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 643-653.
17. Moorman, R. H. (1991). Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 845-855.
18. Rodabaugh, R. C., & Kravitz, D. A. (1994). Effects of procedural fairness on student judgments of professors. Journal of Excellence in College Teaching, 5(2), 67-84.
19. Schwartz, S. H. (1990). Individualism-collectivism: Critique and proposed refinements. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21, 139-157.
20. Steiner, D. D., & Gilliland, S. W. (1996). Fairness reactions to personnel selection techniques in France and the United States. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 134-141.
21. Tata, J. (1999). Grade distributions, grading procedures, and instructor evaluations: A justice perspective. Journal of Psychology, 133, 263-271.
22. Tata, J., & Bowes-Sperry, L. (1996). Emphasis on distributive, procedural, and interactional justice: Differential perceptions of men and women. Psychological Reports, 79, 1327-1330.
23. Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Triandis, H. C., & Albert, R. D. (1987). Cross-cultural perspectives. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication. An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 264-295). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
25. Tyler, T. R. (1994). The psychology of procedural justice: A test of the group value model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 830-838.
26. Walsh, D. J., & Maffei, M. J. (1994). Never in a class by themselves: An examination of behaviors affecting the student-professor relationship. Journal of Excellence in College Teaching, 5(2), 23-50.