Human methadone self-administration and the generalized matching law

Psychological Record

Volumn 55, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 525-538

  Spiga, Ralph ^a   Stockton Maxwell, R ^a   Meisch, Richard A ^b   Grabowski, John ^b  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27844446071     PISSN: 00332933     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03395525     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. ALLEN, C. M. (1981). On the exponent in the "generalized" matching equation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 35, 125-127.
2. AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
3. ANDERSON, K. G., & WOOLVERTON, W. L. (2000). Concurrent variable-interval drug self-administration and the generalized matching law: A drug-class comparison. Behavioural Pharmacology, 11, 413-420.
4. BAUM, W. M. (1974). On two types of deviation from the matching law: Bias and undermatching. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 22, 231-242.
5. BAUM, W. M. (1975). Time allocation in human vigilance. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 23, 45-53.
6. BAUM, W. M. (1979). Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 32, 269-281.
7. BRADSHAW, C. M., & SZABADI, E. (1988). Quantitative analysis of human operant behavior. In G. Davey & C. Cullen (Eds.), Human operant conditioning and behavior modification (pp. 225-259). Chichester: John Wiley.
8. BUSKIST, W. F., & MILLER, H. L. (1981). Concurrent operant performance in humans: Matching when food is the reinforcer. The Psychological Record, 31, 95-100.
9. CLIFFE, M. J., & PARRY, S. J. (1980). Matching to reinforcer value: Human concurrent variable-interval performance. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 557-570.
10. DAVISON, M., & MCCARTHY, D. (1988). The matching law. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
11. DE VILLIERS, P. (1977). Choice in concurrent schedules and a quantitative formulation of the law of effect. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior (pp. 233-287). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
12. ELK, R., GRABOWSKI, J., RHOADES, H., & MCLELLAN, A. T. (1993). A substance-abuse research-treatment clinic: Effective procedures and systems. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 10, 459-471.
13. FLESHER, M., & HUFFMAN, H. S. (1962). A progression for generating variable-interval schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 5, 529-530
14. GRIFFITHS, R. R., BIGELOW, G. E., & HENNINGFIELD, J. E. (1980). Similarities in animal and human drug-taking behavior. In N. K. Mello (Ed.), Advances in substance abuse, Vol. 1 (pp. 1-90). Greenwich: JAI Press.
15. HENNINGFIELD, J. E., COHEN, C., & HEISHMAN, S. J. (1991). Drug self-administration methadone abuse liability evaluation. British Journal of Addiction, 86, 1571-1577.
16. HENNINGFIELD, J. E., LUKAS, S. E., & BIGELOW, G. E. (1986). Human studies of drugs as reinforcers. In S. R. Goldberg & I. P. Stolerman (Eds.), Behavioral analysis of drug dependence (pp. 69-122). New York: Academic Press.
17. HERRNSTEIN, R. J. (1961). Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4, 267-272.
18. HERRNSTEIN, R. J. (1970). On the law of effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13, 243-266.
19. HYTEN, C., MADDEN, G. J., & FIELD, D. P. (1994). Exchange delays and impulsive choice in adult humans. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 62, 225-233.
20. IGLAUER, C., & WOODS, J. H. (1974). Concurrent performances: Reinforcement by different doses of intravenous cocaine in rhesus monkeys. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 22, 179-196.
21. KAMIN, L. J. (1969). Predictability, surprise, attention and conditioning. In B. A. Campbell & R. M. Church (Eds.), Punishment and aversive behavior (pp. 279-298). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
22. KING, G. R., & LOGUE, A. W. (1987). Choice in a self-control paradigm with human subjects: Effects of changeover delay duration. Learning and Motivation, 18, 421-438.
23. KIRK, R. E. (1968). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences. Belmont: Brooks/Cole.
24. KOLLINS, S. H., NEWLAND, M. S., & CRITCHFIELD, T. S. (1997). Human sensitivity to reinforcement in operant choice: How much do consequences matter? Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 208-220.
25. LAMB, R. J., PRESTON, K. L., SCHINDLER, C. W., MEISCH, R. A., DAVIS, F., KATZ J. L., HENNINGFIELD, J. E., & GOLDBERG, S. R. (1991). The reinforcing and subjective effects of morphine in post-addicts: A dose-response study. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 259, 1165-1173.
26. LLEWELLYN, M. E., IGLAUER, C., & WOODS, J. (1976). Relative reinforcer magnitude under a nonindependent concurrent schedule of cocaine reinforcement in rhesus monkeys. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 25, 81-91.
27. MEISCH, R. A., & SPIGA, R. (1998). Matching under nonindependent variable-ratio schedules of drug reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 70, 23-34.
28. MELLO, N. K., & MENDELSON, J. H. (1980). Buprenorphine suppresses heroin use by heroin addicts. Science, 207, 657-659.
29. MELLO, N. K., MENDELSON, J. H., & KUEHNLE, J. C. (1982). Buprenorphine effects on human heroin self-administration: an operant analysis. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 223, 30-39.
30. MELLO, N. K., MENDELSON, J. H., KUEHNLE, J. C., & SELLERS, M. S. (1981). Operant analysis of human heroin self-administration and the effects of naltrexone. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 216, 45-54.
31. MICHAEL, J. (1982). Distinguishing between discriminative and motivational functions of stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 149-155.
32. MICHAEL, J. (1993). Establishing operations. Behavior Analyst, 16, 191-206.
33. MOTULSKY, H. (1999). Analyzing data with GraphPad Prism. San Diego: GraphPad Software, Inc.
34. PIERCE, W. D., & EPLING, W. F. (1983). Choice, matching, and human behavior: A review of the literature. Behavior Analyst, 6, 57-76.
35. PRELEC, D. (1984). The assumptions underlying the generalized matching law. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 41, 101-107.
36. SCHROEDER, S. R., & HOLLAND, J. G. (1969). Reinforcement of eye movement with concurrent schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 897-903.
37. SPIGA, R., GRABOWSKI, J., SILVERMAN, P. B., & MEISCH, R. A. (1996). Human methadone self-administration: Effects of dose ratio requirement. Behavioural Pharmacology, 7, 1-8.
38. SPIGA, R., HUANG, D. B., MEISCH, R. A., & GRABOWSKI, J. (2001). Human methadone self-administration: Effects of diazepam pretreatment. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 9, 40-46.
39. SPIGA, R., MACENSKI, M. J., MEISCH, R. A. & ROACHE, J. D. (1997). Human ethanol self-administration I: The interaction between response requirement and ethanol dose. Behavioural Pharmacology, 8, 91-100.
40. SPIGA, R., & ROACHE, J. D. (1997). Human drug self-administration: A review and methodological critique. In B. A. Johnson & J. D. Roache (Eds.), Drug addiction and its treatment: Nexus of neuroscience and behavior (pp. 39-71). Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers.
41. SPIGA, R., SCHMITZ, J., & DAY, J. (1998). Effects of nicotine on methadone self-administration in humans. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 50, 157-165.
42. TAKAHASHI, M., & IWAMOTO, T. (1986). Human concurrent performances: The effects of experience, instructions, and schedule-correlated stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45, 257-267.
43. WEARDEN, J. H. (1988). Some neglected problems in the analysis of human operant behavior. In G. Davey & C. Cullen (Eds.), Human operant conditioning and behavior modification (pp. 197-224). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
44. WILLIAMS, B. A. (1988). Reinforcement, choice, and response strength. In R. C. Atkinson & R. J. Herrnstein (Eds.), Siemens' handbook of experimental psychology: Vol. 2. Learning and cognition (2nd ed., pp. 167-244). Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.
45. WOOLVERTON, W. L. (1996). Intravenous self-administration of cocaine under concurrent VI schedules of reinforcement. Psychopharmacology, 127, 195-203.
46. WOOLVERTON, W. L., & ALLING, K. (1999). Choice under concurrent VI schedules: Comparison of behavior maintained by cocaine or food. Psychopharmacology, 141, 47-56.
47. WURSTER, R. M., & GRIFFITHS, R. R. (1979). Human concurrent performances: Variation of reinforcer magnitude and rate of reinforcement. The Psychological Record, 29, 341-354.
48. YOUNG, A. M., & HERLING, S. (1986). Drugs as reinforcers: Studies in laboratory animals. In S. R. Goldberg & I. P. Stolerman (Eds.), Behavioral analysis of drug dependence (pp. 9-67). Orlando: Academic Press.