Equivalence class establishment with two-, three-, and four-choice matching to sample by senior citizens

Psychological Record

Volumn 55, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 539-559

  Saunders, Richard R ^a   Chaney, Lisa ^a   Marquis, Janet G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27844442612     PISSN: 00332933     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03395526     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. ADAMS, B. J., FIELDS, L., & VERHAVE, T. (1993). Effects of test order on intersubject variability during equivalence class formation. The Psychological Record, 43, 133-152.
2. ARNTZEN, E., & HOLTH, P. (1997). Probability of stimulus equivalence as a function of training design. The Psychological Record, 47, 309-320.
3. ARNTZEN, E., & HOLTH, P. (2000). Equivalence outcome in single subjects as a function of training structure. The Psychological Record, 50, 603-628.
4. BOELENS, H. (1994). A traditional account of stimulus equivalence. The Psychological Record, 44, 587-605.
5. BUFFINGTON, D. M., FIELDS, L., & ADAMS, B. J. (1997). Enhancing the formation of equivalence classes by pretraining of other equivalence classes. The Psychological Record, 47, 1-20.
6. CARRIGAN, P. F., & SIDMAN, M. (1992). Conditional discrimination and equivalence relations: A theoretical analysis of control by negative stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 58, 183-204.
7. FIELDS, L., ADAMS, B. J., VERHAVE, T., & NEWMAN, S. (1990). The effects of nodality on the formation of equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 53, 345-358.
8. FIELDS, L., HOBBIE-REEVE, S. A., ADAMS, B. J., & REEVE, K. F. (1999). Effects of training directionality and class size on equivalence class formation by adults. The Psychological Record, 49, 703-723.
9. FIELDS, L., LANDON-JIMENEZ, D. V., BUFFINGTON, D. M., & ADAMS, B. J. (1995). Maintained nodal-distance effects in equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64, 129-154.
10. FIELDS, L., REEVE, K. F., ROSEN, D., VARELAS, A., ADAMS, B. J., BELANICH, J., & HOBBIE, S. A. (1997). Using the simultaneous protocol to study equivalence class formation: The facilitating effects of nodal number and size of previously established equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 67, 367-389.
11. FIELDS, L., & VERHAVE, T. (1987). The structure of equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 48, 317-332.
12. HOLTH, P., & ARNTZEN, E. (1998). Stimulus familiarity and the delayed emergence of stimulus equivalence or consistent nonequivalence. The Psychological Record, 48, 81-110.
13. HOLTH, P., & ARNTZEN, E. (2000). Reaction times and the emergence of class consistent responding: A case for precurrent responding? The Psychological Record, 50, 305-337.
14. JOHNSON, C., & SIDMAN, M. (1993). Conditional discrimination on equivalence relations: Control by negative stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 333-347.
15. SAUNDERS, K. J., SAUNDERS, R. R., WILLIAMS, D. C., & SPRADLIN, J. E. (1993). An interaction of instructions and training design on stimulus class formation: Extending the analysis of equivalence. The Psychological Record, 43, 725-744.
16. SAUNDERS, R. R., DRAKE, K. M., & SPRADLIN, J. E. (1999). Equivalence class establishment, expansion, and modification in preschool children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 71, 195-214.
17. SAUNDERS, R. R., & GREEN, G. (1999). A discrimination analysis of training-structure effects on stimulus equivalence outcomes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 72, 117-137.
18. SAUNDERS, R. R., WACHTER, J., & SPRADLIN, J. E. (1988). Establishing auditory stimulus control over an eight-member equivalence class via conditional discrimination procedures. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 49, 95-115.
19. SIDMAN, M. (1971). Reading and auditory-visual equivalences. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 14, 5-13.
20. SIDMAN, M. (1987). Two choices are not enough. Behavior Analysis, 22, 11-18.
21. SIDMAN, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston: Authors Cooperative.
22. SIDMAN, M., KIRK, B., & WILLSON-MORRIS, M. (1985). Six-member stimulus classes generated by conditional-discrimination procedures. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 43, 21-42.
23. SKINNER, B. F. (1968). The technology of teaching. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
24. SPRADLIN, J. E., COTTER, V. W., & BAXLEY, N. (1973). Establishing a conditional discrimination without direct training: A study of transfer with retarded adolescents. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 77, 556-566.
25. SPRADLIN, J. E., & SAUNDERS, R. R. (1986). The development of stimulus classes using match-to-sample procedures: Sample classification versus comparison classification. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 6, 41-58.
26. STEELE, D., & HAYES, S. C. (1991). Stimulus equivalence and arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 519-555.
27. URCUIOLI, P. J., & ZENTALL, T. R. (1993). A test of comparison-stimulus substitutability following one-to-many matching by pigeons. The Psychological Record, 43, 745-759.
28. URCUIOLI, P. J., ZENTALL, T. R., JACKSON-SMITH, P., & STEIRN, J. N. (1989). Evidence for common coding to many-to-one matching: Retention, intertrial interference, and transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 15, 264-273.
29. WILSON, K. M., & MILAN, M. A. (1995). Age differences in the formation of equivalence classes. Journal of Gerontology, 50B, 212-218.