Ethics and world pictures in Kamm on enhancement

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 19-20

  Ashcroft, Richard E ^a   Gui, Karen P ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHILD; CHILD REARING; ETHICAL THEORY; ETHICS; GIFTED CHILD; HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH; HUMAN; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; NOTE; PRESCHOOL CHILD; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH;

BIOMEDICAL ENHANCEMENT; CHILD; CHILD REARING; CHILD, GIFTED; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; ETHICAL ANALYSIS; ETHICAL THEORY; HUMANS; SOCIAL VALUES;

EID: 27844439090     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265160591002674     Document Type: Note

References (10)

1. Ashcroft, R. E. 2003. American biofutures: Ideology and utopia in the Fukuyama-Stock debate. Journal of Medical Ethics 29:59-62.
2. Habermas, J. 2003. The future of human nature. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
3. Harris, J. 1998. Clones, genes and immortality: Ethics and the genetic revolution. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
4. Kamm, F. M. 1993. Mortality, morality: Vol. 1 - Death and whom to save from it. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
5. Kamm, F. M. 2005. Is there a problem with enhancement? American Journal of Bioethics 5(3): 5-14.
6. Little, M. O. 2000. Moral generalities revisited. In Moral particularism, ed. B. Hooker, and M. O. Little, 276-304. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
7. Little, M. O. 2003. The morality of abortion. In Ethical issues in modern medicine, ed. B. Steinbock, J. D. Arras, and A. J. London, 492-500. Boston: McGraw Hill.
8. Murray, T. H. 1996. The worth of a child. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
9. Parens, E. (ed.) 2000. Enhancing human traits: Ethical and social implications. Georgetown, VA: Georgetown University Press.
10. Sandel, M., 2004. The case against perfection. The Atlantic Monthly 293(3): 51-62.