Assessment of noncognitive influences on learning

Educational Assessment

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 147-151

  Abedi, Jamal ^a,b   O'Neil, Harold F ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b National Center for Research on Evaluation Standards and Student Testing (CRESST)   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27844432205     PISSN: 10627197     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15326977ea1003_1     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. Alexander, P. A., & Murphy, P. K. (1998). The research base for APA's learner-centered psychological principals. In N. M. Lambert & B. L. McCombs (Eds.), How students learn: Reforming schools through learner-centered education (pp. 25-60). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
2. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
3. Artelt, C., Baumert, J., Julius-McElvany, N., & Peschar, J. (2003). Learners for life: Student approaches to learning. Results from PISA 2000. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
4. Atkin, J. M., Black, P., & Coffey, J. (Eds.). (2001). Classroom Assessment and the National Science Education Standards (National Research Council: Committee on Classroom Assessment and the National Science Education Standards; Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
5. Clark, R. C. (2005). Motivation strategies. In H. F. O'Neil (Ed.), What works in distance learning: Guidelines (pp. 89-109). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing, Inc.
6. Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., & Noe, R. A. (2000). Toward an integrative theory of training motivation: A meta-analytic path analysis of 20 years of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 678-707.
7. Hough, L. M. (2001). I/Owes its advances to personality. In B. W. Roberts & R. Hogan (Eds.), Personality psychology in the workplace. Decade of behavior (pp. 19-44). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
8. Kariuki, P., & Wilson, P. (2002, November). The effects of motivation on at risk high school students in math performance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Chattanooga, TN.
9. Ma, X. (1997). Reciprocal relationships between attitude toward mathematics and achievement in mathematics. The Journal of Educational Research, 90, 221-229.
10. O'Neil, H. F., & Chuang, S. (2005). Self-regulation strategies. In H. F. O'Neil (Ed.), What works in distance learning: Guidelines (pp. 111-121). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing, Inc.
11. Pellegrino, J., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (Eds.). (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessments (National Research Council: Committee on the Foundations of Assessment; Board on Testing and Assessment, Center for Education. Division on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
12. Schmidt, F. L. (1994). The future of personnel selection in the U.S. Army. In M. G. Rumsey & C. B. Walker (Eds.), Personnel selection and classification (pp. 333-350). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
13. Schreiber, J. B. (2002). Institutional and student factors and their influence on advanced mathematics achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 95, 274-286.
14. Tapia, M., & Marsh, G. E. (2000, November). Effects of gender, achievement in mathematics, and ethnicity toward mathematics. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Bowling Green, KY.