Democratic variants and democratic variance: How domestic constraints shape interstate conflict

Journal of Politics

Volumn 67, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 250-270

  Clark, David H ^a   Nordstrom, Timothy ^b  

^a BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27744529147     PISSN: 00223816     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2005.00316.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Alvarez, R. Michael, and John Brehm. 1995. "American Ambivalence Towards Abortion Policy: Development of a Heteroscedastic Probit Model of Competing Values." American Journal of Political Science 39 (November): 1055-1082.
2. Auerswald, David P. 2000. Disarmed Democracies: Domestic Institutions and the Use of Force. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
3. Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, James D. Morrow, Randolph M. Siverson, and Alastair Smith. 1999. "An Institutional Explanation of the Democratic Peace." American Political Science Review 93 (December): 791-807.
4. Clark, David H. 2000. "Agreeing to Disagree: Domestic Institutional Congruence, and US Dispute Behavior." Political Research Quarterly 53 (June): 375-401.
5. Fearon, James D. 1994. "Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes." American Political Science Review 88 (September): 577-99.
6. Franklin, Charles H. 1991. "Eschewing Obfuscation? Campaigns and the Perception of U.S. Senate Incumbents." American Political Science Review 85 (December): 1193-1214.
7. Gelpi, Christopher. 1997. "Democratic Diversions: Governmental Structure and the Externalization of Domestic Conflict." Journal of Conflict Resolution 41 (April): 255-82.
8. Gill, Jeff. 1999. "The Insignificance of Null Hypothesis Significance Testing." Political Research Quarterly 52 (September): 647-74.
9. Ireland, Michael J., and Scott Sigmund Gartner. 2001. "Time to Fight: Government Type and Conflict Initiation in Parliamentary Systems." Journal of Conflict Resolution 45 (October): 547-68.
10. Jacoby, William G. 1988. "The Impact of Party Identification on Issue Attitudes." American Journal of Political Science 32 (August): 643-61.
11. Koch, Michael. 2002. "Where's the Party? The Relationship of Parliaments, Parties, and Partisanship to Dispute Behavior 1945-1992." Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Davis.
12. Leblang, David, and Steve Chan. 2002. "Explaining Wars Fought by Established Democracies: Do Institutional Constraints Matter?" Unpublished manuscript, University of Colorado, Boulder.
13. MacMillan, John. 2003. "Beyond the Separate Democratic Peace." Journal of Peace Research 40 (March): 233-43.
14. Maoz, Zeev, and Bruce Russett. 1993. "Normative and Structural Causes of Peace." American Political Science Review 87 (September): 624-38.
15. Martin, Lisa L. 2000. Democratic Commitments: Legislatures and International Cooperation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
16. Milner, Helen V. 1997. Interests, Institutions, and Information. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
17. Morgan, T. Clifton, and Sally Campbell. 1991. "Domestic Structure, Decisional Constraints and War: So Why Kant Democracies Fight?" Journal of Conflict Resolution 35 (June): 187-211.
18. Palmer, Glenn, Tamar R. London, and Patrick M. Regan. 2004. "What's Stopping You?: The Sources of Political Constraints on International Conflict Behavior in Parliamentary Democracies." International Interaction 30 (January-March): 1-24.
19. Peceny, Mark, and Caroline C. Beer. 2003. "Peaceful Parties and Puzzling Personalities." American Political Science Review 97 (June): 339-42.
20. Peceny, Mark, Caroline C. Beer, and Shannon Sanchez-Terry. 2002. "Dictatorial Peace?" American Political Science Review 96 (March): 15-26.
21. Prins, Brandon C., and Christopher Sprecher. 1999. "Institutional Constraints, Political Opposition, and Interstate Dispute Escalation: Evidence from Parliamentary Systems, 1946-1989." Journal of Peace Research 36 (May): 271-87.
22. Ray, James Lee. 1995. Democracy and International Conflict. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
23. Reed, William. 2003. "Information, Power, and War." American Political Science Review 97 (December): 633-41.
24. Reiter, Dan, and Allan C. Stain. 2002. Democracies at War. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
25. Reiter, Dan, and Allan C. Stam. 2003. "Identifying the Culprit: Democracy, Dictatorship, and Dispute Initiation." American Political Science Review 97 (June): 333-47.
26. Reiter, Dan, and Erik R. Tillman. 2002. "Public, Legislative, and Executive Constraints on the Democratic Initiation of Conflict." Journal of Politics 64(3): 810-26.
27. Russett, Bruce M. 1993. Grasping the Democratic Peace: Principles for a Post-Cold War World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
28. Russett, Bruce M., and John R. Oneal. 2000. Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
29. Schultz, Kenneth A. 1999. "Do Democratic Institutions Constrain of Inform? Constrasting Two Institutional Perspectives on Democracy and War." International Organization 53 (Spring): 233-66.
30. Vanhanen, Tatu. 1997. Prospects of Democracy: A Study of 172 Countries. London: Routledge.