Electronic performance appraisals: The effects of e-mail communication on peer ratings in actual and simulated environments

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

Volumn 98, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 216-226

  Kurtzberg, Terri R ^a   Naquin, Charles E ^b   Belkin, Liuba Y ^c  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

^c RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

E mail; Performance appraisal; Social obligation; Technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 27744489832     PISSN: 07495978     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.07.001     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. B. Barry & I.S. Fulmer The medium and the message: The adaptive use of communication media in dyadic influence Academy of Management Review 29 2004 272-292
2. R.M. Baron & D.A. Kenny The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychology research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 1986 1173-1182
3. S. Booth-Kewley J.E. Edwards & P. Rosenfeld Impression management, social desirability, and computer administration of attitude questionnaires: Does the computer make a difference? Journal of Applied Psychology 77 1992 562-566
4. J. Butler G. Ferris & N. Napier Strategy and human resource management 1991 South-Western Publishing Cincinnati
5. Cannavale, F. J., Scarr, H. A., & Pepitone, A. (1970). Deindividuation in the small group: Further evidence. In W. L. Richman, S. Kiesler, S. Weisband, & F. Drasgow (1999). A meta-analytic study of social desirability distortion in computer-administered questionnaires, traditional questionnaires, and interviews. Journal of Applied Psychology 84, 754-775
6. J.R. Carlson & R.W. Zmud Channel expansion theory and the experiential nature of media richness perceptions Academy of Management Journal 42 1999 153-170
7. R.L. Daft & R.J. Lengel Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design Management Science 32 1986 554-571
8. G. DeSanctis & M.S. Poole Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive Structuration Theory Organization Science 5 1994 121-147
9. V.U. Druskat & S.B. Wolff Effects and timing of developmental peer appraisals in self-managing work groups Journal of Applied Psychology 84 1999 58-74
10. V. Dubrovsky S. Kiesler & B. Sethna The equalization phenomenon: Status effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision groups Human Computer Interaction 6 1991 119-146
11. J.E. Finegan & N.J. Allen Computerized and written questionnaires: Are they equivalent? Computers in Human Behavior 10 1994 483-496
12. M.C. Fiol Intraorganizational cognition and interpretation In J.A.C. Baum (Ed.) Companion to Organizations 2002 Blackwell Malden, MA
13. J. Fulk J. Schmitz & C.W. Steinfield A social influence model of technology use 1990 Sage Newbury Park, CA
14. T.L. Griffith & G.B. Northcraft Distinguishing between the forest and the trees: Media, features, and methodology in electronic communication research Organization Science 5 1994 272-285
15. B.G. Herbert & J.D. Vorauer Seeing through the screen: Is evaluative feedback communicated more effectively in face-to-face or computer-mediated exchanges Computers in Human Behavior 19 2003 25-38
16. A. Joinson & Social desirability, anonymity, and Internet-based questionnaires Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 31 1999 433-438
17. J.R. Katzenbach & D.K. Smith The wisdom of teams: Creating the high performance organization 1993 Harvard Business School Press Boston, MA
18. D.A. Kenny D.A. Kashy & N. Bolger Data analysis in social psychology 4th ed. In D. Gilbert S. Fiske & G. Lindzey (Eds.) The handbook of social psychology Vol. 1 1998 McGraw-Hill Boston, MA 233-265
19. S. Kiesler & L.S. Sproull Response effects in the electronic survey Public Opinion Quarterly 50 1986 402-413
20. S. Kiesler & L. Sproull Group decision making and communication technology Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 52 1992 96-123
21. W.C. King & E.W. Miles A quasi-experimental assessment of the effect of computerizing noncognitive paper-and-pen measurements: A test of measurement equivalence Journal of Applied Psychology 80 1995 643-651
22. R.C. King & W. Xia Media appropriateness: Effects of experience on communication media choice Decision Sciences 28 1997 877-910
23. E.M. Landry Scrolling around the new organization: The potential for conflict in the on-line environment Negotiation Journal 2000 133-142
24. G.J. Lautenschlager & V.L. Flaherty Computer administration of questions: More desirable or more social desirability? Journal of Applied Psychology 75 1990 310-314
25. A.S. Lee Electronic mail as a medium for rich communication: An empirical investigation using hermeneutic interpretation MIS Quarterly 18 1994 143-157
26. P.E. Levy & J.R. Williams The social context of performance appraisal: A review and framework for the future Journal of Management 30 2004 881-905
27. M. Markus Electronic mail as the medium of managerial choice Organization Science 5 1994 502-527
28. C.L. Martin & D.H. Nagao Some effects of computerized interviewing on job applicant responses Journal of Applied Psychology 74 1989 72-80
29. J. Martin Meta-theoretical controversies in studying organizational culture 2003 Oxford University Press Oxford, UK
30. K.O. McGraw & S.P. Wong Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients Psychological Methods 1 1996 30-46
31. K.Y.A. McKenna & J.A. Bargh Plan 9 from cyberspace: The implications of the Internet for personality and social psychology Personality and Social Psychology Review 4 2000 57-75
32. D.A. Moore T.R. Kurtzberg L.L. Thompson & M.W. Morris Long and short routes to success in electronically mediated negotiation: Group affiliations and good vibrations Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 77 1999 22-43
33. M.W. Morris J. Nadler T.R. Kurtzberg & L. Thompson Schmooze or lose: Social friction and lubrication in e-mail negotiations Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice 6 2002 89-100
34. D.A. Nadler M.S. Gerstein & R.B. Shaw Organizational architecture: Designs for changing organizations 1992 Jossey-Bass Publishers San Francisco
35. Nadler, J., & Shestowshy, D. (2004). Negotiation, information technology, and the problem of the faceless other: Dispute Resolution Research Center, Working paper #304. Kellogg School of Management.
36. C.E. Naquin & G.D. Paulson Online bargaining and interpersonal trust Journal of Applied Psychology 88 2003 113-120
37. O.K. Ngwenyama & A.S. Lee Communication richness in electronic mail: Critical Social Theory and the contextually of meaning MIS Quarterly 1997 145-167
38. W. Ouchi Theory Z 1981 Addison-Wesley New York
39. A.C. Poe Don't touch that 'send' button HR Magazine 2001 2001
40. D. Potosky & P. Bobko Computer versus paper-and-pen administration mode and response distortion in noncognitive selection tests Journal of Applied Psychology 87 1997 293-299
41. R.E. Rice Task analyzability, use of new media, and effectiveness: A multi-site exploration of media richness Organization Science 3 1992 475-500
42. W.L. Richman S. Kiesler S. Weisband & F. Drasgow A meta-analytic study of social desirability distortion in computer-administered questionnaires, traditional questionnaires, and interviews Journal of Applied Psychology 84 1999 754-775
43. P. Rosenfield S. Booth-Kewley J.E. Edwards & M.D. Thomas Responses on computer survey: Impression management, social desirability, and the Big Brother syndrome Computers in Human Behavior 12 1996 263-274
44. R. Saavedra & S.K. Kwun Peer evaluations in self-managing work groups Journal of Applied Psychology 78 1993 450-462
45. L.D. Shellie & B.O. Gilbert Method of psychological assessment, self-disclosure, and experiential differences: A study of computer, questionnaire, and interview assessment formats Journal of Social Behavior and Personality 10 1995 255-263
46. T.H. Shore L.M. Shore & G.C. Thornton Construct validity of self and peer evaluations of performance dimensions in an assessment center Journal of Applied Psychology 77 1992 42-54
47. P.E. Shrout & J.L. Fleiss Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability Psychological Bulletin 86 1979 420-428
48. J. Siegel V. Dubrovsky S. Kiesler & T.W. McGuire Group processes in computer mediated communication Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 37 1986 241-262
49. P.F. Siddle Mind your e-mail manners Journal of Accountancy 2003
50. H.A. Simon Administrative behavior 4th ed. 1997 Free Press New York
51. B.M. Staw Rationality and justification in organizational life 1980 JAI Press Greenwich, CT
52. S.W. Sussman & L. Sproull Straight talk: Delivering bad news through electronic communication Information Systems Research 10 1999 150-166
53. A. Swidler Culture in action: Symbols and strategies American Sociological Review 51 1986 273-286
54. L. Thompson Making the team: A guide for managers 2nd ed. 2004 Prentice-Hall Upper Saddle River, NJ
55. K.L. Valley & V.H. Medvec ABC-local negotiation case 1996 Harvard Business School Boston, MA
56. K.E. Weick The social psychology of organizing 2nd ed. 1979 Addison-Wesley
57. J.M. Wilkerson D.H. Nagao & C.L. Martin Socially desirable responding in computerized questionnaires: When questionnaire purpose matters more than the mode Journal of Applied Social Psychology 32 2002 544-559
58. F.J. Yammarino & D.A. Waldman Performance in relation to job skill importance: A consideration of rater source Journal of Applied Psychology 78 1993 242-249
59. J. Yates & W.J. Orlikowski Genres of organizational communication: A structurational approach to studying communication and media Academy of Management Review 17 1992 299-326
60. B.T. Yates J.L. Wagner & L.M. Suprenant Recall of health-risky behaviors for the prior 2 or 4 weeks via computerized versus printed questionnaire Computers in Human Behavior 13 1997 83-110
61. W.J. Zerbe & D.L. Paulhus Socially desirable responding in organizational behavior: A reconception Academy of Management Review 12 1987 250-264