Corporate governance, ownership structure and corporate efficiency: The case of Ukraine

Managerial and Decision Economics

Volumn 26, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 451-460

  Zheka, Vitaliy ^a  

^a IVAN FRANKO NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF LVIV   (Ukraine)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 27744484157     PISSN: 01436570     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mde.1258     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Andreyeva T. 2003. Company performance in Ukraine: what governs its success. Working Paper, Economics Education and Research Consortium, Moscow.
2. Aslund A, Boone P. 2002. Russia's surprise economic success. Financial Times. London.
3. Barbareta GP, Turati G, Zago AM. 2001. On the impact of ownership structure and hospital efficiency in Italy. Working Paper.
4. Black B. 2001. The corporate governance behaviour and market value of Russian firms. Emerging Markets Review 2. http://papers.ssrn.com/paper. taf7abstract-id = 263014
5. Coelli T, Prasada Rao D, Battese G. 2002. An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht.
6. Copeland T, Koller T, Murrin J. 2000. Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies (3rd edn). McKinsey & Company, Inc. New York.
7. Färe R, Grosskoph S, Lovel CAK. 1994. Production Frontiers. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
8. Färe R, Grosskoph S, Zelenyuk V. 2002. Aggregation of cost efficiency indicators and indexes across firms. Scientific Report.
9. Färe R, Zelenyuk V. 2002. On aggregate Farrell efficiencies. European Journal of Operational Research 146: 615-620.
10. Farrell M. 1957. The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 120(3): 253-290.
11. Frydman R, Gray C, Hessel M, Rapaczynski A. 1997. Private ownership and corporate performance: evidence from transition economies. World Bank Working Paper.
12. Grygorenko G. 2001. Do privatized enterprises perform better than state-owned ones in Ukraine. Unpublished MA Thesis, Economics Education and Research Consortium, and National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy, Ukraine.
13. Higgs D. 2003. Review of the role and effectiveness of non-executive directors. Report for the Department of Trade and Industry, Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, www.dti.gov.uk/cld/non_exec_review
14. Kuznetsov P, Muravyev A. 2001. Ownership structure and firm performance in Russia: the case of blue chips of the stock market. Working Paper.
15. McKinsey. 2002. Global investor opinion survey, http:// www.mckinsey.com/practices/corporategovernance/
16. OECD. 1999. Principles of Corporate Governance. OECD. Paris.
17. Sarbanes Oxley Act. 2002. One Hundred Seventh Congress of the USA, 23 January 2002. Washington D.C.
18. Sherbakova T. 2003. Efficiency of mixed-owned enterprises. Unpublished MA Thesis, Economics Education and Research Consortium, and National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy, Ukraine.
19. Shleifer A, Vishny R. 1997. A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance 52: 737-783.
20. Standard and Poor's Corporate Governance Scores: Criteria, Methodology and Definitions. 2002. McGraw-Hill: New York.
21. Stiglitz J. 1999. Whither Reform? Ten Years of Transition. Paper prepared for the Annual Bank Conference on Development Economics, Washington, DC.
22. Talavera O. 2001. The effect of foreign direct investment on firm performance in Ukraine. Unpublished MA Thesis, Economics Education and Research Consortium, and National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy, Ukraine.
23. Yudaeva K, Kozlov K, Melentieva N, Ponomareva N. 2000. Does foreign ownership matter? Russian experience. GET Project.
24. Zheng J, Liu X, Bigsten A. 1998. Ownership structure and determinants of technical efficiency: an application of data envelopment analysis to Chinese enterprises (1986-1990). Journal of Comparative Economics 26: 465-484.