Silent fMRI acquisition methods for large acoustic noise during scan

Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 181-187

  Okada, Tomohisa ^a   Nakai, Toshiharu ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH AND INNOVATION   (Japan)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AIST   (Japan)

Author keywords

Auditory cortex; Functional MRI; Gradient noise; Noise effects

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPUTER PROGRAM; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; NOISE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

ACOUSTICS; ARTIFACTS; BRAIN MAPPING; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NOISE; SOFTWARE;

EID: 27744474248     PISSN: 13473182     EISSN: 18802206     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2463/mrms.2.181     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Matsuo K, Kato C, Okada T, et al. Finger movements lighten neural loads in the recognition of ideographic characters. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2003; 17:263-272.
2. Hanakawa T, Honda M, Okada T, Fukuyama H, Shibasaki H. Neural correlates underlying mental calculation in abacus experts: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuroimage 2003; 19:296-307.
3. Okada T, Tanaka S, Nakai T, et al. Facial recognition reactivates the primary visual cortex: an functional magnetic resonance imaging study in humans. Neurosci Lett 2003; 350:21-24.
4. Iidaka T, Okada T, Murata T, et al. Age-related differences in the medial temporal lobe responses to emotional faces as revealed by fMRI. Hippocampus 2002; 12:352-362.
5. Nagahama Y, Okada T, Katsumi Y, et al. Dissociable mechanisms of attentional control within the human prefrontal Cortex. Cereb Cortex 2001; 11:85-92.
6. Okada T, Tanaka S, Nakai T, et al. Naming of animals and tools: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study of categorical differences in the human brain areas commonly used for naming visually presented objects. Neurosci Lett 2000; 296:33-36.
7. Sawamoto N, Honda M, Okada T, et al. Expectation of pain enhances responses to nonpainful somatosensory stimulation in the anterior cingulate cortex and parietal operculumWposterior insula: an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurosci 2000; 20:7438-7445.
8. Sadato N, Okada T, Honda M, Yonekura Y. Critical period for cross-modal plasticity in blind humans: a functional MRI study. Neuroimage 2002; 16:389-400.
9. Oga T, Honda M, Toma K, et al. Abnormal cortical mechanisms of voluntary muscle relaxation in patients with writer's cramp: an fMRI study. Brain 2002; 125:895-903.
10. Hanakawa T, Ikeda A, Sadato N, et al. Functional mapping of human medial frontal motor areas. The combined use of functional magnetic resonance imaging and cortical stimulation. Exp Brain Res 2001; 138:403-409.
11. Ravicz ME, Melcher JR, Kiang NY. Acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Acoust Soc Am 2000; 108:1683-1696.
12. Mansfield P, Chapman BL, Bowtell R, Glover P, Coxon R, Harvey PR. Active acoustic screening: reduction of noise in gradient coils by Lorentz force balancing. Magn Reson Med 1995; 33:276-281.
13. Katsunuma A, Takamori H, Sakakura Y, et al. Quiet MRI with novel acoustic noise reduction. Magma 2002; 13:139-144.
14. Cho ZH, Chung ST, Chung JY, et al. A new silent magnetic resonance imaging using a rotating DC gradient. Magn Reson Med 1998; 39:317-321.
15. Ravicz ME, Melcher JR. Isolating the auditory system from acoustic noise during functional magnetic resonance imaging: examination of noise conduction through the ear canal, head, and body. J Acoust Soc Am 2001; 109:216-231.
16. Talavage TM, Edmister WB, Ledden PJ, Weisskoff RM. Quantitative assessment of auditory cortex responses induced by imager acoustic noise. Hum Brain Mapp 1999; 7:79-88.
17. Bandettini PA, Jesmanowicz A, Van Kylen J, Birn RM, Hyde JS. Functional MRI of brain activation induced by scanner acoustic noise. Magn Reson Med 1998; 39:410-416.
18. O'Connor KN, Sutter ML. Global spectral and location effects in auditory perceptual grouping. J Cogn Neurosci 2000; 12:342-354.
19. Cho ZH, Park SH, Kim JH, et al. Analysis of acoustic noise in MRI. Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 15:815-822.
20. Novitski N, Alho K, Korzyukov O, et al. Effects of acoustic gradient noise from functional magnetic resonance imaging on auditory processing as reflected by event-related brain potentials. Neuroimage 2001; 14:244-251.
21. Shah NJ, Jancke L, Grosse-Ruyken ML, Muller-Gartner HW. Influence of acoustic masking noise in fMRI of the auditory cortex during phonetic discrimination. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 9: 19-25.
22. Smith AP. Acute effects of noise exposure: an experimental investigation of the effects of noise and task parameters on cognitive vigilance tasks. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1988; 60:307-310.
23. Mechelli A, Henson RN, Price CJ, Friston KJ. Comparing event-related and epoch analysis in blocked design fMRI. Neuroimage 2003; 18:806-810.
24. Edmister WB, Talavage TM, Ledden PJ, Weisskoff RM. Improved auditory cortex imaging using clustered volume acquisitions. Hum Brain Mapp 1999; 7:89-97.
25. Hall DA, Haggard MP, Akeroyd MA. "Sparse" temporal sampling in auditory fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp 1999; 7:213-223.
26. Yang Y, Engelien A, Engelien W, Xu S, Stern E, Silbersweig DA. A silent event-related functional MRI technique for brain activation studies without interference of scanner acoustic noise. Magn Reson Med 2000; 43:185-190.
27. Friston KJ, Frith CD, Turner R, Frackowiak RS. Characterizing dynamic brain responses with fMRI: a multivariate approach. Neuroimage 1995; 2:166-172.
28. Aguirre GK, Zarahn E, D'Esposito M. The variability of human, BOLD hemodynamic responses. Neuroimage 1998; 8:360-369.
29. Miezin FM, Maccotta L, Ollinger JM, Petersen SE, Buckner RL. Characterizing the hemodynamic response: effects of presentation rate, sampling procedure, and the possibility of ordering brain activity based on relative timing. Neuroimage 2000; 11:735-759.
30. Birn RM, Saad ZS, Bandettini PA. Spatial heterogeneity of the nonlinear dynamics in the FMRI BOLD response. Neuroimage 2001; 14:817-826.
31. Buckner RL, Bandettini PA, O'Craven KM, et al. Detection of cortical activation during averaged single trials of a cognitive task using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996; 93:14878-14883.
32. Formisano E, Linden DE, Di Salle F. Tracking the mind's image in the brain I: time-resolved fMRI during visuospatial mental imagery. Neuron 2002; 35:185-194.
33. Belin P, Zatorre RJ, Hoge R, Evans AC, Pike B. Event-related fMRI of the auditory cortex. Neuroimage 1999; 10:417-429.
34. Okada T, Honda M, Okamoto J, Sadato N. Activation of the primary and association auditory cortex by the transition of sound intensity: an event-related fMRI study. 8th Int Conf of Human Brain Mapping. Sendai, Japan, 2002.
35. Harms MP, Melcher JR. Sound repetition rate in the human auditory pathway: representations in the waveshape and amplitude of fMRI activation. J Neurophysiol 2002; 88:1433-1450.
36. de Zwart JA, van Gelderen P, Kellman P, Duyn JH. Reduction of gradient acoustic noise in MRI using SENSE-EPI. Neuroimage 2002; 16:1151-1155.
37. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, Boesiger P. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999; 42:952-962.