Computer-assisted navigation and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Accuracy and outcomes

Orthopedics

Volumn 28, Issue 10 SUPPL., 2005, Pages

  Koh, Jason ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RUPTURE; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER SYSTEM; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JOINT LAXITY; KNEE DISEASE; KNEE INSTABILITY; KNEE LIGAMENT INJURY; ROTATION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; THERAPEUTIC ERROR; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; HUMANS; ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 27744468696     PISSN: 01477447     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. AOSSM institutes multi-center revision ACL study. In: Matava MJ, Boden BP, eds. AOSSM Sports Medicine Update March-April. 2005:5. http://www.sportsmed.org/sml/esmu/March-April%202005/css/ SMU(Mar-Apr05)_5.htm
2. Griffin LY, Agel J, Albohm MJ, et al. Noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injuries: risk factors and prevention strategies. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2000; 8:141-150.
3. Jarvela T, Paakkala T, Jarvela K, Kannus P, Jarvinen M. Graft placement after the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a new method to evaluate the femoral and tibial placements of the graft. Knee. 2001; 8:219-227.
4. Getelman MH, Friedman MJ. Revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1999; 7:189-198.
5. Markolf KL, Hame S, Hunter DM, et al. Effects of femoral tunnel placement on knee laxity and forces in an anterior cruciate ligament graft. J Orthop Res. 2002; 20:1016-1024.
6. Loh JC, Fukuda Y, Tsuda E, Steadman RJ, Fu FH, Woo SL. Knee stability and graft function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison between 11 o'clock and 10 o'clock femoral tunnel placement. Arthroscopy. 2003; 19:297-304.
7. Yaru NC, Daniel DM, Penner D, The effect of tibial attachment site on graft impingement in an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 1992; 20:217-220.
8. Allen CA, Giffin JR, Harner CD. Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Orthop Clin North Am. 2003; 34:79-98.
9. Romano VM, Graf BK, Keene JS, Lange RH. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The effect of tibial tunnel placement on range of motion. Am J Sports Med. 1993; 21:415-418.
10. Aglietti P, Buzzi R, Giron F, Simeone AJ, Zaccherotti G. Arthroscopic-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the central third patellar tendon. A 5-8-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1997; 5:138-144.
11. Howell SM, Clark JA. Tibial tunnel placement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions and graft impingement. Clin Orthop. 1992; 283:187-195.
12. Howell SM, Taylor MA. Failure of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament due to impingement by the intercondylar roof. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993; 75:1044-1055.
13. Howell SM, Clark JA, Farley TE. Serial magnetic resonance study assessing the effects of impingement on the MR image of the patellar tendon graft. Arthroscopy. 1992; 8:350-358.
14. Fung D, Zhang LQ. ACL impingement [Thesis]. Chicago, III: Northwestern University School of Biomedical Engineering; 2005.
15. Bents RT, Jones RC, May DA, Snearly WS. Intercondylar notch encroachment following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective study. Am J Knee Surg. 1998; 11:81-88.
16. Muneta T, Yamamoto H, Ishibashi T, Asahina S, Murakami S, Furuya K. The effects of tibial tunnel placement and roofplasty on reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament knees. Arthroscopy. 1995; 11:57-62.
17. Howell SM, Wallace MP, Hull ML, Deutsch ML. Evaluation of the single-incision arthroscopic technique for anterior cruciate ligament replacement. A study of tibial tunnel placement, intraoperative graft tension, and stability. Am J Sports Med. 1999; 27:284-293.
18. Carson EW, Simonian PT, Wickiewicz TL, Warren RF. Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Instr Course Lect. 1998; 47:361-368.
19. Grontvedt T, Pena F, Engebretsen L. Accuracy of femoral tunnel placement and resulting graft force using one or two-incision drill guides. A cadaver study on ten paired knees. Arthroscopy. 1996; 12:187-192.
20. Sommer C, Friederich NF, Muller W. Improperly placed anterior cruciate ligament grafts: correlation between radiological parameters and clinical results. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2000; 8:207-213.
21. Ikeda H, Muneta T, Niga S, Hoshino A, Asahina S, Yamamota H. The long-term effects of tibial drill hole position on the outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 1999; 15:287-291.
22. Khalfayan EE, Sharkey PF, Alexander AH, Bruckner JD, Bynum EB. The relationship between tunnel placement and clinical results after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 1996; 24:335-341.
23. Boden B, Migaud H, Gougeon F, Debroucker MJ, Duquennoy A. Effect of graft position on laxity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Stress radiography in 90 knees 2 to 5 years after autograft. Acta Orthop Belg. 1996; 62:2-7.
24. Sati M, Staubli H, Bourquin Y, Kunz M, Nolte LP. Real-time computerized in situ guidance system for ACL graft placement. Comput Aided Surg. 2002; 7:25-40.
25. Kohn D, Busche T, Carls J. Drill hole position in endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Results on an advanced arthroscopy course. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 1998; 6 (Suppl 1):13-15.
26. Picard F, DiGioia AM, Moody J, et al. Accuracy in tunnel placement for ACL reconstruction. Comparison of traditional arthroscopic computer-assisted navigation technique. Comp Aid Surg. 2001; 6:279-289.
27. Burkart A, Debski RE, McMahon PJ, et al. Precision of ACL tunnel placement using traditional and robotic techniques. Comput Aided Surg. 2001; 6:270-278.
28. Sudhahar TA, Glasgow MM, Donell ST. Comparison of expected vs. actual tunnel position in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee. 2004; 11:15-18.
29. Cha PS, West RV, Harner CD. The results of using intraoperative fluoroscopy for ideal tibial tunnel position during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Proceedings of the 11th ESSKA Congress and 4th World Congress on Sports Trauma, 2004, Athens, Greece; May 8, 2004.
30. Klos TV, Habets RJ, Banks AZ, Banks SA, Devilee RJ, Cook FF. Computer assistance in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Orthop. 1998; 354:65-69.
31. Cole J, Brand JC Jr, Caborn DN, Johnson DL. Radiographic analysis of femoral tunnel position in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Knee Surg. 2000; 13:218-222.
32. Klos TV, Harman MK, Habets RJ, Devilee RJ, Banks SA. Locating femoral graft placement from lateral radiographs in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of 3 methods of measuring radiographic images. Arthroscopy. 2000; 16:499-504.
33. Colville MR, Bowman RR. The significance of isometer measurements and graft position during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 1993; 21:832-835.
34. Degenhart M. Computer-navigated ACL reconstruction with the OrthoPilot. Surg Technol Int. 2004; 12:245-251.
35. Jalliard R, Lavallee S, Dessennie V. Computer assisted reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Clin Orthop. 1998; 354:57-64.
36. Eichhorn HJ. Image-free navigation in ACL replacement with the OrthoPilot system, in navigation and robotics in total joint and spine surgery. In: Stiehl JB, Konermann WH, Haaker RG, eds. Navigation and Robotics in Total Joint and Spine Surgery. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag; 2003:387-396.
37. Eichhorn J. Three years of experience with computer navigation-assisted positioning of drilling tunnels in anterior cruciate ligament replacement (SS-67). Arthroscopy. 2004; Suppl. 20:31-32. Available at: http://download.journals.elsevierhealth.com/pdfs/journals/ 0749-8063/PIIS0749806304001720.pdf
38. Eichhorn J. Three years of experience with computer-assisted navigation in ACL replacement. Available at: http://www.aclstudygroup.com/Powerpoint-pdf02/Eichhorn.pdf