Weighing excited nuclear states with a Penning trap mass spectrometer

Physics Letters, Section A: General, Atomic and Solid State Physics

Volumn 347, Issue 1-3, 2005, Pages 81-87

  Weber, C ^a   Audi, G ^b   Beck, D ^a   Blaum, K ^a,c   Bollen, G ^d   Herfurth, F ^a,c   Kellerbauer, A ^a   Kluge, H J ^a,e   Lunney, D ^b   Schwarz, S ^d  

^a GSI HELMHOLTZZENTRUM FÜR SCHWERIONENFORSCHUNG GMBH   (Germany)

^b CENTRE DE CALCUL DE L INSTITUT NATIONAL DE PHYSIQUE NUCLEAIRE ET DE PHYSIQUE DES PARTICULES   (France)

^c CERN   (Switzerland)

^d MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Atomic mass; Binding energy; Isomer; Laser ionization; Lead; Penning trap; Radionuclide

Indexed keywords

BINDING ENERGY; ION SOURCES; IONIZATION; ISOMERS; LEAD; MASS SPECTROMETERS; RADIOISOTOPES;

ATOMIC MASS; ENERGY DIFFERENCES; HIGH-ACCURACY; ISOMERIC STATE; LASER ION SOURCES; LASER IONIZATION; MASS MEASUREMENTS; PENNING TRAP;

WEIGHING;

EID: 27744463116     PISSN: 03759601     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.physleta.2005.06.108     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. D. Lunney, J.M. Pearson, and C. Thibault Rev. Mod. Phys. 75 2003 1021
2. K. Langanke, and M. Wiescher Rep. Prog. Phys. 64 2001 1657
3. C. Thibault Phys. Rev. C 12 1975 644
4. P. Dabkiewicz Phys. Lett. B 82 1979 199
5. K. Heyde Phys. Rep. 102 1983 291
6. J.L. Wood Phys. Rep. 215 1992 101
7. A.N. Andreyev Nature 405 2000 430
8. A.N. Andreyev Phys. Rev. C 66 2002 014313
9. S. Schwarz Nucl. Phys. A 693 2001 533
10. G. Bollen Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 368 1996 675
11. F. Herfurth Nucl. Instrum. Methods A 469 2001 254
12. E. Kugler Hyperfine Interact. 129 2000 23
13. V.I. Mishin Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 73 1993 550
14. U. Köster Spectrochim. Acta 58 2003 1047
15. H. Raimbault-Hartmann Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 126 1997 378
16. G. Savard Phys. Lett. A 158 1991 247
17. G. Gräff, H. Kalinowski, and J. Traut Z. Phys. A 297 1980 35
18. M. König Int. J. Mass. Spectrom. Ion Processes 142 1995 95
19. G. Bollen Nucl. Phys. A 693 2001 3
20. A. Kellerbauer Eur. Phys. J. D 22 2003 53
21. K. Blaum J. Phys. B 36 2003 921
22. K. Blaum Nucl. Phys. A 746 2004 305c
23. F. Herfurth, et al., Eur. Phys. J. A direct 2005, DOI: 10.1140/epjad/i2005-06-031-3, in press
24. G. Bollen Phys. Rev. C 46 1992 R2140
25. G. Audi Nucl. Phys. A 378 1982 443
26. K. Blaum Europhys. Lett. 67 2004 586
27. G. Audi Nucl. Phys. A 624 1997 1
28. J. Van Roosbroeck Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 2004 112501
29. P. Misaelides Z. Phys. A 301 1981 199
30. G. Audi, Compilation of the Atomic-Mass Evaluation in 2002 used for comparison in this data analysis, since our mass values are already included in the AME 2003 [32]
31. M.P. Bradley Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 1999 4510
32. G. Audi, A.H. Wapstra, and C. Thibault Nucl. Phys. A 729 2003 337
33. Yu.A. Litvinov Nucl. Phys. A 756 2005 3