Differentiation of benign from malignant solid breast masses: Conventional US versus spatial compound imaging

Radiology

Volumn 237, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 841-846

  Cha, Joo Hee ^a   Moon, Woo Kyung ^b   Cho, Nariya ^b   Chung, Sun Yang ^b   Park, Seong Ho ^c   Park, Jeong Mi ^d   Han, B K ^e   Choe, Yeon Hyun ^e   Cho, Gyunggo ^b   Im, Jung Gi ^b  

^a Seoul National University Boramae Hospital   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University Hospital   (South Korea)

^c University of Ulsan College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^d UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^e Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BENIGN TUMOR; BREAST TUMOR; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; TISSUE DIFFERENTIATION; ULTRASOUND;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 27744457751     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2373041480     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Stavros AT, Thickman D, Rapp CL, Dennis MA, Parker SH, Sisney GA. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 1995;196:123-134.
2. Rahbar G, Sie AC, Hansen GC, et al. Benign versus malignant solid breast masses: US differentiation. Radiology 1999;213:889-894.
3. Baker JA, Kornguth PJ, Soo MS, Walsh R, Mengoni P. Sonography of solid breast lesions: observer variability of lesion description and assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;172:1621-1625.
4. Entrekin RR, Porter BA, Sillesen HH, Wong AD, Cooperberg PL, Fix CH. Real-time spatial compound imaging: application to breast, vascular, and musculoskeletal ultrasound. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2001;22:50-64.
5. Lin DC, Nazarian LN, O'Kane PL, McShane JM, Parker L, Merritt CR. Advantages of real-time spatial compound sonography of the musculoskeletal system versus conventional sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:1629-1631.
6. Merritt CR. Technology update. Radiol Clin North Am 2001;39:385-397.
7. Huber S, Wagner M, Medl M, Czembirek H. Real-time spatial compound imaging in breast ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 2002;28:155-163.
8. Seo BK, Oh YW, Kim HR, et al. Sonographic evaluation of breast nodules: comparison of conventional, real-time compound, and pulse-inversion harmonic images. Korean J Radiol 2002;3:38-44.
9. Malich A, Marx C, Sauner D. Assessment of conventional versus real-time spatial compound imaging in breast sonography: preliminary results. J Clin Ultrasound 2003;31:59-60.
10. Kwak JY, Kim EK, You JK, Oh KK. Variable breast conditions: comparison of conventional and real-time compound ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med 2004;23:85-96.
11. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS). 3rd ed. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 1998.
12. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-174.
13. Metz CE. Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. Invest Radiol 1989;24:234-245.
14. Metz CE. ROCKIT 0.9B software. Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, Illinois. http://xray.bsd.uchicago.edu/krl/roc_soft.htm. Accessed June 10, 2004.
15. McClish DK. Analyzing a portion of the ROC curve. Med Decis Making 1989;9:190-195.
16. Jiang Y, Metz CE, Nishikawa RM. A receiver operating characteristic partial area index for highly sensitive diagnostic tests. Radiology 1996;201:745-750.
17. Lamb PM, Perry NM, Vinnicombe SJ, Wells CA. Correlation between ultrasound characteristics, mammographic findings and histological grade in patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. Clin Radiol 2000;55:40-44.
18. Moon WK, Im JG, Koh YH, Noh DY, Park IA. US of mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications. Radiology 2000;217:849-854.
19. Moon WK, Myung JS, Lee YJ, Park IA, Noh DY, Im JG. US of ductal carcinoma in situ. RadioGraphics 2002;22:269-280.
20. Horsch K, Giger ML, Vyborny CJ, Venta LA. Performance of computer-aided diagnosis in the interpretation of lesions on breast sonography. Acad Radiol 2004;11:272-280.
21. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS): ultrasound. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 2003.