Minimally invasive Stryker-Osteonics unicompartmental knee prosthesis with metal-backed tibia component: A 5-year follow-up;Minimalinvasiv implantierte unikondyläre knieendoprothese typ Stryker-Osteonics mit metal-backed tibiakomponente: Ein 5-jahres-follow-up

Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Ihre Grenzgebiete

Volumn 143, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 573-580

  Endres, Stefan ^a,c   Steinheiser, E ^b   Wilke, A ^a  

^a PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

^b Center for Shoulder and Elbow Surgery   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MARBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Metal backed tibia component; Minimally invasive technique; Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

METAL;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; HUMAN; KNEE ARTHRITIS; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; REHABILITATION; SOFT TISSUE DEFECT; SPORT; TIBIA;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GERMANY; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; METALS; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PROGNOSIS; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REOPERATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TIBIA; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 27644548041     PISSN: 00443220     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-836833     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bartel DL, Bicknell VL, Wright TM. The effect of conformity, thickness, and material on stresses in ultra-high molecular weight components for total joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1986; 68: 1041-1051
2. Bengtson S, Knutson K. The infected knee arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up of 357 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 1991; 62: 301-311
3. Berger RA, Nedeff DD, Barden RM, Sheinkop MM, Jacobs JJ, Resenberg AG, Galante JO. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clinical experience at 6- to 10-year follow-up. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999; 367: 50-60
4. Bottner F, Pavone V, Johnson T, Heitkemper S, Sculco TP. Blood management after bilateral total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003; 410: 254-261
5. Choi HR, Hasegawa Y, Kondo S, Shimizu T, Ida K, Iwata H. High tibial osteotomy for varus gonarthrosis: a 10- to 24-year follow-up study. J Orthop Sci 2001; 6: 493-497
6. Deshmukh RV, Scott RD. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for younger patients: an alternative view. Clin Orthop 2002; 404: 108-112
7. Deshmukh RV, Scott RD. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: long-term results. Clin Orthop 2001; 392: 272-278
8. Engh GA, Ammeen D. Is an intact anterior cruciate ligament needed in order to have a well-functioning unicondylar knee replacement? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; 428: 170-173
9. Engh GA, Dwyer KA, Hanes CK. Polyethylene wear of metal-backed tibial components in total and Unicompartmental knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1992; 74: 9-17
10. Engh GA, McAuley JP. Unicondylar arthoplasty: An option for high-demand patients with gonarthrosis. Instr Course Lect 1999; 48: 143-148
11. Hauselmann HJ, Muff L, Stucki G. Gonarthrosis - assessment and conservative therapy. Ther Umsch 1996; 53: 732-737
12. Hyldahl HC, Regner L, Carlsson L, Karrholm J, Weidenhielm L. Does metal backing improve fixation of tibial component in unicondylar knee arthroplasty? A randomized radiostereometric analysis. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16: 174-179
13. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop 1989; 248: 13-14
14. Jefferson RJ, Whittle MW. Functional biomechanical results of Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared with total condylar arthroplasty and tibial osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1990; 72: 161-162
15. Jenny JY, Boeri C. Accuracy of implantation of a Unicompartmental total knee arthroplasty with 2 different instrumentations: a case-controlled comparative study. J Arthroplasty 2002; 17: 1016-1020
16. Kozinn SC, Scott R. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1989; 71: 145-149
17. Labek G, Bohler N. Minimally invasive medial Unicompartmental knee replacement. Der Orthopäde 2003; 32: 454-460
18. Lai CH, Rand JA. Revision of failed Unicompartmental total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993; 193-201
19. Levine WN, Ozuna RM, Scott RD. Conversion of failed modern Unicompartmental arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1996; 11: 797-801
20. Lindstrand A, Stenstrom A, Ryd L, Toksvig-Larsen S. The introduction period of Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is critical: a clinical, clinical multicentered, and radiostereometric study of 251 Duracon unicompartmental knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 2000; 15: 608-616
21. McAuley JP, Engh GA, Ammeen DJ. Revision of failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2001; 392: 279-282
22. Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O'Connor JJ. The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1998; 80: 983-989
23. Newman JH, Ackroyd CE, Shah NA. Unicompartmental or total knee replacement? Five-year results of a prospective randomized trial of 102 osteoarthritic knees with unicompartmental arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1998; 80: 862-865
24. Newman JH. Unicompartmental knee replacement. Knee 2000; 7: 63-70
25. Price AJ, Webb J, Topf H, Dodd CA, Goodfellow JW, Murray DW, Oxford Hip and Knee Group. Rapid recovery after oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty through a short incision. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16: 970-976
26. Rajasekhar C, Das S, Smith A. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. 2-to 12-year results in a community hospital. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2004; 86: 983-985
27. Repicci JA, Eberle RW. Minimally invasive surgical technique for unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J South Orthop Assoc 1999; 8: 20-27
28. Ridgeway SR, McAuley JP, Ammeen DJ, Engh GA. The effect of alignment of the knee on the outcome of unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2002; 84: 351-355
29. Robertsson O, Borgquist L, Knutson K, Lewold S, Lidgren L Use of unicompartmental instead of tricompartmental prostheses for unicompartmental arthrosis in the knee is a cost-effective alternative. 15 437 primary tricompartmental prostheses were compared with 10 624 primary medial or lateral unicompartmental prostheses. Acta Orthop Scand 1999; 70: 170-175
30. Robertsson O, Dunbar M, Pehrsson T, Knutson K, Lidgren L. Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty: a report on 27 372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand 2000; 71: 262-267
31. Rougraff BT, Heck DA, Gibson AE. A comparison of tricompartmental and unicompartmental arthroplasty for the treatment of gonarthrosis. Clin Orthop 1991; 273: 157-164
32. Svard UC, Price AJ. Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A survival analysis of an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2001; 83: 191-194
33. Tabor Jr OB, Tabor OB. Unicompartmental arthroplasty: a long-term follow-up study. J Arthroplasty. 1998; 13: 373-379
34. Yang KY, Wang MC, Yeo SJ, Lo NN. Minimally invasive unicondylar versus total condylar knee arthroplasty - early results of a matched-pair comparison. Singapore Med J 2003; 44: 559-562