The role of the built environment in the disablement process

American Journal of Public Health

Volumn 95, Issue 11, 2005, Pages 1933-1939

  Clarke, Philippa ^a,d   George, Linda K ^b,c  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISABILITY; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HOUSING; HUMAN; LEG; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POISSON DISTRIBUTION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REVIEW; SELF CARE; UNITED STATES;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; CHRONIC DISEASE; DISABLED PERSONS; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FEMALE; GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; LOWER EXTREMITY; MALE; NORTH CAROLINA; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS; SELF CARE; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

EID: 27644508835     PISSN: 00900036     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.054494     Document Type: Review

References (42)

1. Nagi S. Some conceptual issues in disability and rehabilitation. In: Sussman MB, ed. Sociology and Rehabilitation. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association; 1965:100-113.
2. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2001.
3. Verbrugge LM, Jette AM. The disablement process. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38:1-4.
4. Atchley RC. Activity adaptations to the development of functional limitations and results for subjective well-being in later adulthood. J Aging Stud. 1998;12:19-38.
5. Peek MK, Ottenbacher KJ, Markides KS, Ostier GV. Examining the disablement process among older Mexican American adults. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57:413-425.
6. Cervero R, Kockelman K. Travel demand and the 3 Ds: density, diversity, and design. Transportation Res D. 1997;2:199-219.
7. Cervero R. Built environments and mode choice: toward a normative framework. Transportation Res D. 2002;7:265-284.
8. Cervero R, Duncan M. Walking, bicycling, and urban landscapes: evidence from the San Francisco Bay area. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:1478-1483.
9. Frank L, Pivo G. The impacts of mixed use and density on the utilization of three modes of travel: the single occupant vehicle, transit, and walking. Transportation Res Rec. 1994;1466:44-52.
10. Cervero R. Mixed land-uses and commuting: evidence from the American Housing Survey. Transportation Res A. 1996;30:361-377.
11. Kochera A. Livable communities: research results relevant to making communities livable for residents aging in place. Gerontologist. 2003;43(Spec. Issue 1):445-446.
12. Fisher KJ, Li F, Michael Y, Cleveland M. Neighborhood-level influences on physical activity among older adults: a multilevel analysis. J Aging Phys Act. 2004;11:45-63.
13. Humpel N, Owen N, Leslie E. Environmental factors associated with adults' participation in physical activity. Am J Prev Med. 2002;22:188-199.
14. Owen N, Leslie E, Salmon J, Fotheringham MJ. Environmental determinants of physical activity and sedentary behavior. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2000;28:153-158.
15. Addy CL, Wilson DK, Kirtland KA, Ainsworth BE, Sharpe P, Kimsey D. Associations of perceived social and physical environmental supports with physical activity and walking behavior. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:440-443.
16. Lopez R. Urban sprawl and risk for being overweight or obese. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:1574-1579.
17. Retting RA, Ferguson SA, McCartt AT. A review of evidence-based traffic engineering measures designed to reduce pedestrian-motor vehicle crashes. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:1456-1463.
18. Knoblauch RL, Tustin BH, Smith SA, Pietrucha MT. Investigation of Exposure-Based Pedestrian Accident Areas: Crosswalks, Sidewalks, Local Streets, and Major Arterials. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation; 1987. DOT publication FHWA-RD-87-038.
19. Ewing R, Schieber RA, Zegeer CV. Urban sprawl as a risk factor in motor vehicle occupant and pedestrian fatalities. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:1541-1545.
20. Leyden KM. Social capital and the built environment: the importance of walkable neighborhoods. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:1546-1551.
21. Thomson H, Pettricrew M, Douglas M. Health impact assessment of housing improvements: incorporating research evidence. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003;57:11-16.
22. Northridge ME, Sclar ED, Biswas P, Sorting out the connections between the built environment and health: a conceptual framework for navigating pathways and planning healthy cities. J Urban Health. 2003;80:556-568.
23. Curtis C, Cave B, Coutts A. Is urban regeneration good for health? Perceptions and theories of the health impacts of urban change. Environ Plan C: Government Policy. 2002;20:517-534.
24. Bashir SA. Home is where the harm is: inadequate housing as a public health crisis. Am J Public Health. 2002;92:733-738.
25. Debnam K, Harris J, Morris I, Parikh S, Shirey L. Durham County socially isolated older adults: an action-oriented community diagnosis. Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill; May 2002.
26. st Century. Washington, DC: Housing Assistance Council; December 2002. Available at: www. ruralhome.org. Accessed February 8, 2004.
27. McNeil J. Americans with Disabilities: 1991-1992. US Bureau of the Census. Current Population Reports, P70-33. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1993.
28. Glass TA, Balfour JL. Neighborhoods, aging, and functional limitations. In: Kawachi I, Berkman LF, eds. Neighborhoods and Health. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003:303-334.
29. Klinenberg, E. Heat Wave: A Social Autopsy of Disaster in Chicago (Illinois). Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2003.
30. Jette AM, Assmann SF, Rooks D, Harris BA, Crawford S. Interrelationships among disablement concepts. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1998;53A:M395-M404.
31. Lawrence RH, Jette AM. Disentangling the disablement process. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 1996;51B:S173-S182.
32. Balfour JL, Kaplan GA. Neighborhood environment and loss of physical function in older adults: evidence from the Alameda County Study. Am J Epidemio. 2002;155(6):507-515.
33. Cornoni-Huntley J, Brock D, Ostfeld A, et al. Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly: Resource Data Book Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Aging; 1986.
34. US Census Bureau. 1990 Census of Population and Housing, Summary Tape File 3. Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce, Economics, and Statistics; 1990.
35. Branch LG, Katz S, Kniepmann K, Papsidero JA. A prospective study of functional status among community elders. Am J Public Health. 1984;74:266-268.
36. Fillenbaum GG. Multidimensional Functional Assessment of Older Adults: The Duke Older Americans Resources and Services Procedures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.; 1988.
37. Snijders T, Bosker R. Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling. London, England: Sage Publications; 1999.
38. Verbeke G. Linear Mixed Models in Practice: A SAS Oriented Approach. New York: Springer; 1997.
39. Long JS. Regression Models for Categorical and a Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 1997.
40. Lawton MP. Competence, environmental press, and the adaptation of older people. In: Lawton MP, Windley PG, Byerts TO, eds. Aging and the Environment: Theoretical Approaches. New York: Springer; 1982:33-59.
41. Lawton MP. Environmental and other determinants of well-being in older people. Gerontologist. 1983;23:349-357.
42. Kahana E, Lovegreen L, Kahana B, Kahana M. Person, environment, and person-environment fit as influences on residential satisfaction of elders. Environ Behav. 2003;35:434-453.