Forest type affects predation on gypsy moth pupae

Agricultural and Forest Entomology

Volumn 7, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 179-185

  Liebhold, A M ^a   Raffa, K F ^b   Diss, A L ^c  

^a USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^c WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES   (United States)

Author keywords

Lepidoptera; Lymantria dispar; Lymantriidae; Peromyscus; Predator

Indexed keywords

CRICETINAE; INSECTA; INVERTEBRATA; LEPIDOPTERA; LYMANTRIA; LYMANTRIA DISPAR; LYMANTRIIDAE; MAMMALIA; PEROMYSCUS; PEROMYSCUS SP.;

EID: 27644484477     PISSN: 14619555     EISSN: 14619563     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-9555.2005.00256.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bess, H.-A. (1961) Population ecology of the gypsy moth Porthetria Dispar L. (Lepidoptera: Lymantridae). Bulletin 43. New Haven Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, New Haven, Connecticut.
2. Biging, G.S., Giese, R.L. & Nordheim, E.V. (1980) Gypsy moth population simulation for Wisconsin. Forest Science, 26, 710-724.
3. Campbell, R.W. (1967) The analysis of numerical change in gypsy moth populations. Forest Science Monographs, 15, 33.
4. Campbell, R.W. & Sloan, R.J. (1977) Natural regulation of innocuous gypsy moth populations. Environmental Entomology, 6, 315-322.
5. Campbell, R.W., Sloan, R.J. & Biazak, C.E. (1977) Sources of mortality among late instar gypsy moth [Lymantria dispar] larvae in sparse populations. Environmental Entomology, 6, 865-871.
6. Cook, S.P., Smith, H.R., Hain, F.P. & Hastings, F.L. (1995) Predation of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) pupae by invertebrates at low small mammal population densities. Environmental Entomology, 24, 1234-1238.
7. Davidson, C.B., Gottschalk, K.W. & Johnson, J.E. (2001) European gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar L.) outbreaks: a review of the literature. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, General Technical Report, 278, 1-15.
8. Elkinton, J.S., Gould, J.R., Liebhold, A.M., Smith, H.R. & Wallner, W.E. (1989) Are gypsy moth populations in North America regulated at low density? Proceedings, Lymantriidae: A comparison of features of New and Old World tussock moths, (ed. by W.E. Wallner and K.A. McManus), pp. 233-249. US Dept. Agric. Forest Service, Radnor, Pennsylvania.
9. Elkinton, J.S. & Liebhold, A.M. (1990) Population dynamics of gypsy moth in North America. Annual Review of Entomology, 35, 571-596.
10. Elkinton, J.S., Healy, W.M., Buonaccorsi, J.P., Boettner, G.H., Hazzard, A.M., Smith, H.R. & Liebhold, A.M. (1996) Interactions among gypsy moths, white-footed mice, and acorns. Ecology, 77, 2332-2342.
11. Grushecky, S.T., Liebhold, A.M., Greer, R. & Smith, R.L. (1998) Does forest thinning affect predation on gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) larvae and pupae. Environmental Entomology, 27, 268-276.
12. Hastings, F.L., Hain, F.P., Smith, H.R., Cook, S.P. & Monahan, J.F. (2002) Predation of gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) pupae in three ecosystems along the southern edge of infestation. Environmental Entomology, 31, 668-675.
13. Houston, D.R. & Valentine, H.T. (1977) Comparing and predicting forest stand susceptibility to gypsy moth [Lymantria dispar]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 7, 447-461.
14. Jones, C.G., Ostfeld, R.S., Richard, M.P., Schauber, E.M. & Wolff, J.O. (1998) Chain reactions linking acorns to gypsy moth outbreaks and Lyme disease risk. Science, 279, 1023-1026.
15. Kotar, J. & Burger, T.L. (1996) A Guide to Forest Communities and Habitat Types of Central and Southern Wisconsin. Department of Forestry, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
16. Kotar, J., Kovach, J.A. & Locey, C.T. (1988) Field Guide to Forest Habitat Types of Northern Wisconsin. Department of Forestry, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
17. Krebs. C.J. (1998) Ecological Methodology, 2nd edn. Benjamin Cummings, San Francisco, California.
18. Kruse, J.J. & Raffa, K.F. (1997) Effects of selected midwestern larval host plants on performance by two strains of the gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) parasitoid Cotesia melanoscela (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Environmental Entomology, 26, 1155-1166.
19. Liebhold, A.M., Halverson, J.A. & Elmes, G.A. (1992) Gypsy moth invasion in North America: a quantitative analysis. Journal of Biogeography, 19, 513-520.
20. Liebhold, A.M., Gottschalk, K.W., Mason, D.A. & Bush, R.R. (1997) Evaluation of forest susceptibility to the gypsy moth across the conterminous United States. Journal of Forestry, 95, 20-24.
21. Liebhold, A.M., Higashiura, Y. & Unno, A. (1998) Forest type affects predation on gypsy moth (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) pupae in Japan. Environmental Entomology, 27, 858-862.
22. Liebhold, A., Elkinton, J., Williams, D. & Muzika, R.M. (2000) What causes outbreaks of the gypsy moth in North America? Population Ecology, 42, 257-266.
23. Mastro, V.C., Schwalbe, C.P. & O'Dell, T.M. (1981) Sterile-male technique. The Gypsy Moth: Research Toward Integrated Pest Management, vol. 1584 (ed. by C.C. Doane and M.A. McManus), pp. 669-679. US Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, DC.
24. Smith, H.R. (1981) The Gypsy Moth: Research Toward Integrated Pest Management, vol. 1584 (ed. by C.C. Doane and M.L. McManus), pp. 96-124. US Dept. of Agriculture, Washington, DC.
25. Smith, H.R. (1985) Wildlife and the gypsy moth. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 13, 166-174.
26. Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J. (1995) Biometry. W.H. Freeman, New York, New York.
27. Valentine, H.T. & Houston, D.R. (1979) A discriminant function for identifying mixed-oak stand susceptibility to gypsy moth Lymantria dispar defoliation. Forest Science, 25, 468-474.
28. Varley, G.C., Gradwell, G.R. & Hassell, M.P. (1973) Insect Population Ecology: An Analytical Approach. Blackwell Scientific, U.K.
29. Weseloh, R.M. (1990) Estimation of predation rates of gypsy moth larvae by exposure of tethered caterpillars. Environmental Entomology, 19, 448-455.
30. Witter, J.A., Stoyenoff, J.L. & Sapio, F. (1992) Impacts of the gypsy moth in Michigan. Michigan Academician, 25, 67-90.
31. Yahner, R.H. & Smith, H.R. (1991) Small mammal abundance and habitat relationships on deciduous forested sites with different susceptibility to gypsy moth defoliation. Environmental Management, 15, 113-120.