Genetic diversity among CIMMYT maize inbred lines investigated with SSR markers: II. Subtropical, tropical midaltitude, and highland maize inbred lines and their relationships with elite U.S. and European maize

Crop Science

Volumn 45, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 2573-2582

  Xia, X C ^a   Reif, J C ^b   Melchinger, A E ^b   Frisch, M ^b   Hoisington, D A ^d   Beck, D ^c   Pixley, K ^c   Warburton, M L ^c  

^a INSTITUTE OF PLANT PROTECTION   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HOHENHEIM   (Germany)

^c INTERNATIONAL MAIZE AND WHEAT IMPROVEMENT CENTER CIMMYT   (Mexico)

^d INTERNATIONAL CROPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR THE SEMI ARID TROPICS ICRISAT   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 27644482825     PISSN: 0011183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2005.0246     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Beck, D.L., F.J. Betran, M. Banziger, M. Willcox, and G.O. Edmeades. 1997. From landrace to hybrid: Strategies for the use of source populations and lines in the development of drought-tolerant cultivars. p. 369-382. In G.O. Edmeades et al. (ed.) Drought- and low N-tolerant maize. Proc. of a Symp., El Batan, Mexico. 25-29 Mar. 1996. CIMMYT, El Batan.
2. Beck, D.L., S.K. Vasal, and J. Crossa. 1991. Heterosis and combining ability among subtropical and temperate intermediate-maturity maize germplasm. Crop Sci. 31:68-73.
3. Betrán, F.J., J.M. Ribaut, D. Beck, and D. Gonzalez de Leon. 2003. Genetic diversity, specific combining ability, and heterosis in tropical maize under stress and nonstress environments. Crop Sci. 43:797-806.
4. CIMMYT. 2004. Maize inbred lines released by CIMMYT. El Batan, Texcoco, Mexico.
5. Crossa, J., S.K. Vasal, and D.L. Beck. 1990. Combining ability estimates of CIMMYT tropical late yellow maize germplasm. Maydica 35:273-278.
6. Dubreuil, P., P. Dufour, E. Drejci, M. Causse, D. de Vienne, A. Gallais, and A. Charcosset. 1996. Organization of RFLP diversity among inbred lines of maize representing the most significant heterotic groups. Crop Sci. 36:790-799.
7. Duvick, D.N. 1984. Genetic diversity in major farm crops on the farm and in reserve. Econ. Bot. 38:157-174.
8. Eagles, H.A., and J.E. Lothrop. 1994. Highland maize from Central Mexico - Its origin, characteristics, and use in breeding programs. Crop Sci. 34:11-19.
9. Elder, J.K., and E.M. Southern. 1987. Computer-aided analysis of one dimensional restriction fragments gels. p. 165-172. In M.J. Bishop and C.J. Rawling (ed.) Nucleic acid and protein sequence analysis - A practical approach. IRL Press, Oxford, UK.
10. Enoki, H., H. Sato, and K. Koinuma. 2002. SSR anaylsis of genetic diversity among maize inbred lines adapted to cold regions of Japan. Theor. Appl. Genet. 104:1270-1277.
11. Evenson, R.E., and D. Gollin. 2003. Assessing the impact of the green revolution, 1960 to 2000. Science (Washington, DC) 300:758-762.
12. Frisch, M., M. Bohn, and A.E. Melchinger. 2000. Plabsim: Software for simulation of marker-assisted backcrossing. J. Hered. 91:86-87.
13. Gethi, J.C., J.A. Labate, K.R. Lamkey, M.E. Smith, and S. Kresovich. 2002. SSR variation in important U.S. maize inbred lines. Crop Sci. 42:951-957.
14. Goodman, M.M., and C.W. Stuber. 1983. Races of maize: VI. Isozyme variation among races of maize in Bolivia. Maydica 28:169-187.
15. Gower, J.C. 1966. Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis. Biometrika 53:325-328.
16. Hallauer, A.R., W.A. Russell, and K.R. Lamkey. 1988. Corn breeding. p. 463-564. In G.F. Sprague and J.W. Dudley (ed.) Corn and corn improvement. 3rd ed. Agron. Monogr. 18. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI.
17. Ihaka, R., and R. Gentleman. 1996. A language for data analysis and graphics. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 5:299-314.
18. Labate, J.A., K.R. Lamkey, M. Lee, and W.L. Woodman. 1999. Population genetics of increased hybrid performance between two maize populations under reciprocal recurrent selection. p. 127-137. In J.G. Coors and S. Pandey (ed.) The genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crops. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA, Madison, WI.
19. Lu, H., and R. Bernardo. 2001. Molecular marker diversity among current and historical maize inbreds. Theor. Appl. Genet. 103:613-617.
20. Melchinger, A.E., M.M. Messmer, M. Lee, W.L. Woodman, and K.R. Lamkey. 1991. Diversity and relationships among U.S. maize inbreds revealed by restriction length polymorphisms. Crop Sci. 31:669-678.
21. Messmer, M.M., A.E. Melchinger, J. Boppenmaier, R. Herrmann, and E. Brunklaus-Jung. 1992. RFLP analyses of early-maturing European maize germplasm: I. Genetic diversity among flint and dent inbreds. Theor. Appl. Genet. 83:1003-1012.
22. Morris, M.L. 2001. Assessing the benefits of international maize breeding research: An overview of the global maize impacts study. p. 25-34. In P.L. Pingali (ed.) CIMMYT 1999-2000 world maize facts and trends. Meeting world maize needs: Technological opportunities and priorities for the public sector. CIMMYT, D.F. Mexico.
23. Pejic, I., P. Ajmone-Marsan, M. Morgante, V. Kovumplick, P. Castiglioni, G. Taramino, and M. Motto. 1998. Comparative analysis of genetic similarity among maize inbred lines detected by RFLPs, RAPDs, SSRs, and AFLPs. Theor. Appl. Genet. 97:1248-1255.
24. Rebourg, C., M. Chastanet, B. Gouesnard, C. Welcker, P. Dubreuil, and A. Charcosset. 2003. Maize introduction into Europe: The history reviewed in the light of molecular data. Theor. Appl. Genet. 106:895-903.
25. Reif, J.C., A.E. Melchinger, X.C. Xia, M.L. Warburton, D.A. Hoisington, S.K. Vasal, D. Beck, M. Bohn, and M. Frisch. 2003a. Use of SSRs for establishing heterotic groups in subtropical maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 107:947-957.
26. Reif, J.C., A.E. Melchinger, X.C. Xia, M.L. Warburton, D.A. Hoisington, S.K. Vasal, G. Srinivasan, M. Bohn, and M. Frisch. 2003b. Genetic distance based on the simple sequence repeats and heterosis in the tropical maize populations. Crop Sci. 43:1275-1282.
27. Senior, M.L., J.P. Murphy, M.M. Goodman, and C.W. Stuber. 1998. Utility of SSRs for determining genetic similarities and relationships in maize using an agarose gel system. Crop Sci. 38:1088-1098.
28. Smith, J.S.C. 1988. The diversity of U.S. hybrid maize germplasm: Isozymic and chromatographic evidence. Crop Sci. 28:63-70.
29. Smith, J.S.C., and O.S. Smith. 1989. Comparison of heterosis among hybrids as a measure of hybrid relatedness with that to be expected on the basis of pedigree. Maize Genet. Coop. Newsl. 63:86-87.
30. Smith, J.S.C., E.C.L. Chin, H. Shu, O.S. Smith, S.J. Wall, M.L. Senior, S.E. Mitchell, S. Kresovich, and J. Ziegle. 1997. An evaluation of the utility of SSR loci as molecular markers in maize (Zea mays L.): Comparisons with data from RFLPs and pedigree. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95:163-173.
31. Troyer, A.F., S.J. Openshaw, and K.H. Knittle. 1988. Measurement of genetic diversity among popular commercial corn hybrids. Crop Sci. 28:481-485.
32. Vasal, S.K., H.S. Cordova, S. Pandey, and G. Srinivasan. 1999. Tropical maize and heterosis. p. 363-373. In J.G. Coors and S. Pandey (ed.) The genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crops. CSSA, Madison, WI.
33. Vasal, S.K., G. Srinivasan, D.L. Beck, J. Crossa, S. Pandey, and C. De Leon. 1992a. Heterosis and combining ability of CIMMYT's tropical late white maize germplasm. Maydica 37:217-223.
34. Vasal, S.K., G. Srinivasan, J. Crossa, and D.L. Beck. 1992b. Heterosis and combining ability of CIMMYT's subtropical and temperate early-maturity maize germplasm. Crop Sci. 32:884-890.
35. Warburton, M.L., X.C. Xia, J. Crossa, J. Franco, A.E. Melchinger, M. Frisch, M. Bohn, and D.A. Hoisington. 2002. Genetic characterization of CIMMYT maize inbred lines and open pollinated populations using large scale fingerprinting methods. Crop Sci. 42:1832-1840.
36. Wellhausen, E.J. 1978. Recent developments in maize breeding in the tropics. p. 59-91. In D.B. Walden (ed.) Maize breeding and genetics. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
37. Wright, S. 1978. Evolution and genetics of populations. Vol. IV. The Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
38. Xia, X.C., J.C. Reif, D.A. Hoisington, A.E. Melchinger, M. Frisch, and M.L. Warburton. 2004. Genetic diversity among CIMMYT maize inbred lines investigated with SSR markers: I. Lowland tropical maize. Crop Sci. 44:2230-2237.
39. Yuan, L.X., J.H. Fu, S.H. Zhang, X. Liu, Z. Peng, X.H. Li, M.L. Warburton, and M. Khairallah. 2001. Heterotic grouping of maize inbred lines using RFLP and SSR markers. Acta Agron. Sinica 27:149-156.