Specific sensing between inositol epimers by a bis(boronate)

Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry Letters

Volumn 15, Issue 24, 2005, Pages 5416-5418

  Gray Jr , Charles W ^a,b   Johnson Jr , Leland L ^a,b   Walker, Brian T ^a   Sleevi, Mark C ^b   Campbell, A Stewart ^b   Plourde, Robert ^b   Houston, Todd A ^a,c  

^a VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Insmed Incorporated   (United States)

^c GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Boronate receptor; Inositol sensing; PET signaling

Indexed keywords

BORONIC ACID DERIVATIVE; INOSITOL;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; DRUG STRUCTURE; ELECTRON TRANSPORT; EPIMER; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

BORONIC ACIDS; GLUCOSE; INOSITOL; ISOMERISM; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; PHOTOCHEMISTRY;

EID: 27644474209     PISSN: 0960894X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2005.08.112     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. For a review of the chemistry and biochemistry involved in type II diabetes, see: S.A. Ross, E.A. Gulve, and M. Wang Chem. Rev. 104 2004 1255
2. For other pharmaceutical targets within inositol signaling cascades, see: G.D. Prestwich Chem. Biol. 11 2004 619
3. I. Asplin, G. Galasko, and J. Larner Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90 1993 5924
4. S. Suzuki, H. Kawasaki, Y. Satoh, M. Ohtomo, M. Hirai, A. Hirai, S. Hirai, M. Onoda, M. Matsumoto, Y. Hinokio, H. Akai, J. Craig, J. Larner, and T. Toyota Diabetes Care 17 1994 1465
5. J.E. Nestler, D.J. Jakubowicz, P. Reamer, R.D. Gunn, and G. Allan New Engl. J. Med. 340 1999 1314
6. J. Larner Endocr. J. 323 1994 167
7. J. Larner, J.D. Price, D. Heimark, L. Smith, G. Rule, T. Piccariello, M.C. Fonteles, C. Pontes, D. Vale, and L. Huang J. Med. Chem. 46 2003 3283
8. K. Niikura, A. Metzger, and E.V. Anslyn J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120 1998 8533
9. K. Niikura, and E.V. Anslyn J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1999 2769
10. K. Niikura, and E.V. Anslyn J. Org. Chem. 68 2003 10156
11. J. Morey, M. Orell, M.A. Barceló, P.M. Deyà, A. Costa, and P. Ballester Tetrahedron Lett. 45 2004 1261
12. A. Tanimura, A. Nezu, T. Morita, R.J. Turner, and Y. Tojyo J. Biol. Chem. 279 2004 38095
13. C.-Y. Huang, L.A. Cabell, V. Lynch, and E.V. Anslyn J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114 1992 1900
14. C.-Y. Huang, L.A. Cabell, and E.V. Anslyn J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116 1994 2778
15. S.G. Diaz, V. Lynch, and E.V. Anslyn J. Supermol. Chem. 2 2002 201
16. R.E. Ostlund, R. Seemayer, S. Gupta, R. Kimmel, E.L. Ostlund, and W.R. Sherman J. Biol. Chem. 271 1996 10073
17. J.H. Hartley, T.D. James, and C.J. Ward J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2000 3155
18. S. Striegler Curr. Org. Chem. 7 2003 81
19. G. Springsteen, and B. Wang Tetrahedron 58 2002 5291
20. An alternative mechanism for PET quenching has recently been put forward: S. Frazen, W. Ni, and B. Wang J. Phys. Chem. B 107 2003 12942
21. T.D. James, K.R.A.S. Sandanayake, and S. Shinkai Chem. Commun. 1994 477
22. T.D. James, K.R.A.S. Sandanayake, R. Iguchi, and S. Shinkai J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117 1995 8982
23. T.D. James, K.R.A.S. Sandanayake, and S. Shinkai Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 35 1996 1910
24. T.D. James, K.R.A.S. Sandanayake, and S. Shinkai Nature 374 1995 345
25. C.W. Gray Jr., and T.A. Houston J. Org. Chem. 67 2002 5426
26. For an in-depth study of the stereochemical basis of this signaling event, see: J. Zhao, T.M. Fyles, and T.D. James Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 43 2004 3461
27. 1H NMR chemical shifts
28. Predictions based on molecular mechanics minimizations (Merck Molecular Force Field) using Spartan (Wavefunction, Inc.) with the dative B-N bonds defined as covalent bonds.
29. Methyl glucosides have previously shown to be 'silent' toward glucose-binding bis(boronates) by a mechanism similar to what is occurring here (i.e., -methyl glucosides cannot bind two boronates at once although it presumably also has lower affinity for the receptor as well, unlike the present case): M. Takeuchi, S. Yoda, T. Imada, and S. Shinkai Tetrahedron 53 1997 8335
30. Compounds such as 4 are specific sensors for glucose over glucosamine: C.R. Cooper, and T.D. James Chem. Commun. 1997 1419
31. We define specific sensing as signal response to only one epimer and selective sensing as differential responses to each epimer based on enhanced binding affinity of one epimer over the other. For an epimer selective receptor, see: P. Ballester, M. Capó, A. Costa, P.M. Deyà, R. Gornila, A. Decken, and G. Deslongchamps Org. Lett. 3 2001 267